| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/08/2007 12:03:14 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Continuing discussion: |
Posted on 03/09/2007 8:53:08 PM PST by mom4kittys
Edited on 03/09/2007 9:36:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Thread Number Two
Can you tell us more about CNN and Opri??
Spreadsheet? Can’t be seen in the same outfit twice? Are we related?
Wow - good news - I hope NG is about to talk about all this re: KE now. Stern/Wood’s Tivo is probably about to explode...
wonder where stern is getting the moola for all these ‘defamation’ lawsuits? he’s in deep kimshee spending Dannielynn’s money if he’s not pappa....
I'm gonna wear my orlon sweater and button it down the back, crinolins under my skirt. Yow..itchy things!! And we thought we looked loverly besides!!
Please keep us informed. Thanks in advance.
I think you are right. Wasn’t it finally decided he killed the baby for wetting the bed and the others to cover it up?
ROFLMAO.
Bet he was illegal, too..... we had a four car pile up here the other day caused by an illegal without a drivers license; he wasn’t injured, other’s were.
Thanks, I will check out these links.... and you refreshed my memory you are right didn’t he go in and purposely stab the youngest after he killed Collette and the older girl. I had forgotten Collette was pregnant at the time.
Yes, who took those hundreds of pills? A mere factoid that requires answers.....
I’m quaking in my overall’s.
No, actually, I've been thinking about that very question all day...... ROFL!
Fellow clothes horses eh?
(at least in California), the Court’s view is, what happened between the two parents is immaterial; that is, their inability to get along, or how badly they treated each other, or how many knock-down,drag-out fights they had, or how many times they cheated on each other, has no bearing on custody, unless there are prior criminal proceedings or ‘officer of the court’ (CPS) documentation that the Court can consider when determining custody (and so far, we have no criminal proceedings going on, and we have no CPS documentation and we have no DNA results).
The Court’s view is that it’s a violation of the***civil rights*** of the child, to be denied access to their legal(presumed) parent. Until abuse is proved to the Court (not rumor, not emotion, not hunches or suspicion), the Court itself, would be violating the Civil Rights of the child by arbitrarily removing the child without Due Process.
so the lady was technically correct, it doesn’t matter (right now) how Stern treated Anna.
The Courts simply cannot act without proof and without Due Process which, in most ‘real world’ cases, is a Good Thing!
Drugs were in the home while that child was in the home. Kids have been taken away from their "presumed" parent for that alone.
Something ain't quite right about this family. We don't know what it is so we can only hope that someone (O'Quinns people maybe) is investigating the pasts of Howard and his family.
Will patiently wait until we see the information come forward about those bank accounts....but won’t hold my breath.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.