Posted on 01/12/2007 8:34:52 AM PST by SunkenCiv
Archaeologists have discovered stone tools atop a hill in this northern Minnesota town that may be 13,000 to 14,000 years old, according to a published report... Britta Bloomberg, Minnesota's deputy historic preservation officer, said it may be among the oldest known archaeological sites in North and South America. A half-dozen archaeologists, soil scientists and others who have examined the site all said the artifacts are genuine, she said... Mattson said the objects were found underneath a band of rock and gravel that appeared to have been deposited by melting glaciers and then covered by windblown sediment, Mather said... [T]he site appears to be "much older" than the Clovis era of finely made spear points that defines the paleo-Indian period. The find is "startling enough that appropriate response from every archaeologist and glacial geologist is skepticism." But, he added, a half-dozen archaeologists, soil scientists and others who have examined the site all say the artifacts are genuine.
(Excerpt) Read more at wcco.com ...
Okay, you got me on the "high hill" thing. Or should I say that you lost me? I honestly have no idea what a kame or drumlin is and I am now realizing that "high hill" is a rather vague term which definition would be greatly dependent on an individuals personal experience with hills. Lets just say that a good portion of Minnesota has gentle rolling hills, with a few specific areas which tower over the rest. I don't know the exaxt elevation of the area in question in sea level terms but do know that it rises up quite a distance from the shore of Leech Lake.
And yes, the topic in general does pose many interesting questions for the experts and the layman.
Thanks. I wasn't online yesterday, looks like everyone else kept busy, eh? ;')
Thanks for the quick bio. I might in fact be more inclined to cut him a little slack since he didn't receive his "formal" training from the indoctrination centers.
Still in all, his explanation creates some confusion in my simple mind...
Regards
If it's light, I go outside and watch for it ;^) Not always possible or even advisable given the severity of the storm. I've seen several up close and personal. Almost drove into one after making a turn once, but a James Bond turnaround got me out of harm's way. Another time, I had to stop on the levee over Lake Houton to let a small one go by about a half mile or so in front of me. When I continued on, the place where it had crossed the highway was torn to a farethewell. Anyway, I suppose I treat tornado threats about the same as lightning: chances of us being in the same place at the same time are very slim.
At night, I say my prayers and listen for the hail that almost always accompanies tornado producing storms; no hail, probably no tornado. These storms are usually short lived, so they don't often interfere with my, er, beauty rest(which I need lots of).
Meant to answer this in the previous reply, but memory lapses call for additional work it seems. But no, six feet under is not a problem around these parts.
I'm sorry, did I challenge any findings?
Seems to me, my post noted the lay of the land a bit, and indicated another area of possible interest for archaeologists / anthropologists..
I will assume that your comments were directed generally, at previous comments and not to me specifically...
GoLightly; you have been doing some research for sure, (with a few light hearted side trips). http://mrbdc.mnsu.edu/mnbasin/fact_sheets/glaciers.html#
On this site please note the positioning of the glaciers in relationship to the approximated age of the tools found. It seems to be a pretty close fit. http://www.passportintime.com/currentprojects/Minnesota.html
This link is talking about a different, (though similar), project quite a distance from Walker. However, I wouldn't be surprised if Matt is involved in this one also. http://community.livejournal.com/anthropologist/tag/north+america#anthropologist691950
Interesting. Idaho VS. Minnesota. Football anyone?http://community.livejournal.com/anthropologist/816992.html#cutid1
I'm not going to touch the Finlander/Scandinavian controversy.
Getting back on topic, this article seems to have more information, though nothing about that hill:
Check out: http://www.rlnn.com
It seems that the top of this hill is about 150 feet above the shoreline of Leech Lake.
http://www.geology.wisc.edu/~maher/air/air11.htm
Okay. Confession time. My 56K has been trying to load these kame and drumlin pictures for about 20 minutes. I give up.
I can assure you that this hill is much more dramatic than a kame, but the drumlin pic's haven't shown up yet.
For general reference sake, look up pictures of Lake Superior's North Shore north of Duluth, MN. This gives you a general outline of the type of hill but decrease the quantity of granite and add in a lot more trees along the slope. Hope this helps.
Please trust me; this site is no gravel pit. The tools noted were found under several layers of varied strata in an area that has been mostly undisturbed for XXXXXX? years.
BTW Drammach; I just took a look at your profile. You would probably like Matt, (and me), though he leans a little bit libertarian.
Sorry Drammach. Yes my original comments were primarily directed at the overall discussion, not you in particular. I must admit that I have been out of the "posting" loop for a couple of years so my etiquette may not be up to par. Thanks for your patience.
Uh-huh.
btt
Ancient stone tools chip away date of early humans' arrivalRecently, Dr. Chlachula and his colleagues have discovered three more sites containing what they believe are preglacial stone tools. One set of choppers and scrapers, described in the current edition of The Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, was found in a gravel pit near the town of Grimshaw in northern Alberta. The other tools were unearthed last summer at two locations west of Lethbridge. All of them, says Dr. Chlachula, indicate that humans roamed through the Prairies between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago... Dr. Richard Morlan, curator of paleo-environmental studies at the Canadian Museum of Civilization in Hull, Que., says he has no reason to doubt Dr. Chlachula. Few people in the world, says Dr. Morlan, can match the 36-year-old researcher's expertise. Professor Nat Rutter, the former head of geology at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, agrees, noting that Dr. Chlachula has three PhDs and extensive field experience in both old world and new world archaeology... Prof. Rutter, at the University of Edmonton, also has much confidence in his research skills. "Jiri's work embarrassed a lot of other people," he says, because it suggests that Canadian archaeologists have been looking in the wrong place for human artifacts and they should be hunting underneath glacial deposits. "They may not admit it," says Prof. Rutter, "but they're all out there looking now."
by Margaret Munro
National Post
Jan 16 1999
web archive version
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.