Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Straights need not apply [Gay only Condos in MA]
Boston Herald ^ | Sunday, December 17, 2006 | Scott Van Voorhis

Posted on 12/17/2006 9:45:28 AM PST by PajamaTruthMafia

The Bay State, the birthplace of gay marriage, is on the cusp of another revolution in alternative living that could prove to be just as controversial - gay condo communities.

Developers across the country are drawing up plans for condo projects - and sometimes even whole communities - targeted at gay and lesbian buyers. And Massachusetts is proving to be a fertile laboratory for this experiment.

Two planned developments on either end of the state, the Stonewall at Audubon Circle in the Fenway and Paradise One in Easthampton, are pioneering condo complexes marketed to older gay and lesbian residents.

There is talk that a few developers might even move beyond the graying gay population to roll out condo projects aimed at gays of all ages.

But some critics, like state Rep. Brian Wallace (D-South Boston), are fuming over what they see as a new double standard.

“We try and get people in Southie into these (elderly) condos and we get croaked,” Wallace said. “They won’t just let us do South Boston residents.”

“You can do this for one group, and not another?” asked an incredulous Wallace. “It’s pushing the envelope to a drastic point.”

Wallace said Southie has tried time and again to win City Hall’s blessing to build housing targeted at neighborhood seniors, only to be lectured by city development officials about how it would run afoul of fair housing laws. He is threatening to take up the issue with city officials over what he calls a “double standard.”

Boosters of gay condo developments say they have no plans to heap on straights the kind of discrimation they’ve suffered over the years. But it’s unclear how welcoming heterosexual singles and couples would find these communities.

“What if I was saying this building is just for heterosexual people, or Muslims, or Jews or Catholics. What’s the difference?,” asked Michael Carucci, head of ERA Boston Real Estate Group. “To take it the next step and say this building is just for gay people - it’s a bit much,” he said.

Joy Malchodi, who hopes to buy a condo at the Fenway’s proposed Stonewall at Audubon Circle, acknowledged that living in a like-minded community is a major attraction for her. The 58-year-old Fort Point resident recalls days when most gays and lesbians stayed in the closet.

“You would really know your neighbors,” Malchodi said. “The boys would have wonderful dinner parties and I would have plenty of women to go golfing with.”

About 23 other people have put down $1,000 deposits for one of roughly 60 units in the proposed Fenway development

Designed, but not limited to, older gays and lesbians, perks include a dining hall and concierge service. Units will sell from $400,000 to $700,000.

The initial plan for Stonewall called for a condominium co-op. That would have given residents the power to reject would-be buyers, though not on sexual orientation, which would run afoul of anti-discrimination laws.

But while the new project’s condo board will not have such power, residents will have to want to pay for extra services that include a course on “gay grandparents.”Meanwhile, developers are pushing forward with plans for more projects targeted at gays. The Bay State, the birthplace of gay marriage, is on the cusp of another revolution in alternative living that could prove to be just as controversial - gay condo communities David Aronstein, whose Stonewall Communities is marketing the Fenway complex, is exploring the possibility of condo projects for aging gays and lesbians in Boston’s suburbs, as well as in other New England cities such as Providence.

Now some developers - including at least one local builder - are exploring what could be a controversial next step: A condo complex catering to gays of all ages.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: discrimination; gayagenda; gayghettos; gaystate; homosexualagenda; ma; massassachusetts; perverts; whoverifiesgayness; yabbadabbadootime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: null and void

Astroglide Acres..


41 posted on 12/17/2006 10:02:17 AM PST by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

The whole idea of gay grandparents removes the argument from being one of biological origin to philosophical nonsense.

There will always be one grandparent missing from any such association.


42 posted on 12/17/2006 10:03:10 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Paradise Poofta


43 posted on 12/17/2006 10:03:18 AM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

Slide Inn


44 posted on 12/17/2006 10:03:43 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

Some animals are more equal han other animals. This will be a community of pigs.


45 posted on 12/17/2006 10:03:50 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Rozerem commercials give me nightmares)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Evil Estates...


46 posted on 12/17/2006 10:04:29 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
There will always be one grandparent missing from any such association.

Not if the inlaws marry each other...

47 posted on 12/17/2006 10:04:40 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

There are "senior condos" where the resident must be over a certain age with no kids, so why not gay condos?

You can check a person's age quite easily, though. What test will they use to assure the prospective buyer fits the criterion of "homosexual"?


48 posted on 12/17/2006 10:04:41 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Lady

True...but there are exceptions
to almost every rule...and i
think this is a form of
discrimination that should
be *encouraged*.

>Bo)


49 posted on 12/17/2006 10:05:17 AM PST by NickatNite2003 (From the Man from Hope" to the wife who snarls "Abandon All Hope!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The Cordial Colon Complex...


50 posted on 12/17/2006 10:05:22 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

It'll have a nice rec(tum) room...


51 posted on 12/17/2006 10:06:57 AM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

This is nothing but good-old fashioned capitalism folks. Homosexuals have money, and communities across the country are targeting them. Rail against homosexuals all you want morally, but you cannot refute supply-and-demand.


52 posted on 12/17/2006 10:07:14 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

Twin Bushes (Every unit has tongue-in-groove flooring)...


53 posted on 12/17/2006 10:07:29 AM PST by null and void (You might as well do something big, because doing something small is just as hard ~ Larry Bock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NickatNite2003

True...but there are exceptions
to almost every rule...and i
think this is a form of
discrimination that should
be *encouraged*.

>Bo)


* * * * *

I get your point... but if society allowed discrimination here, then the next area of discrimination will be jobs... OOOPS, that's already happened with diversity...


54 posted on 12/17/2006 10:07:39 AM PST by Old Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Motown


55 posted on 12/17/2006 10:08:18 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

I wonder if they have porking in rear oops I meant parking


56 posted on 12/17/2006 10:08:36 AM PST by Luigi Vasellini (What do you call 2 toddlers and some duct tape??........muslim body armor!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

No gerbil is safe tonight in Boston....


57 posted on 12/17/2006 10:08:57 AM PST by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: null and void

No gerbil is safe tonight in Boston....


58 posted on 12/17/2006 10:08:57 AM PST by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Soddom Arms Estates


59 posted on 12/17/2006 10:08:59 AM PST by SaveTheChief (This is my "+3 tagline of smiting")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
Bunghole Bungalow's...
60 posted on 12/17/2006 10:09:04 AM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson