Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mel Wins Friday: #1 'Apocalypto' Bigger Opening Weekend Than 'Braveheart'
Deadline Hollywood Daily ^ | December 8, 2006 | Nikki Finke

Posted on 12/09/2006 3:38:57 AM PST by Mel Gibson

Call it a Hollywood shocker: Mel's Apocalypto will have a bigger weekend opening than his Braveheart. Despite scandal, an R-rating, subtitles because of an ancient dialect, no stars, and direct competition from movieland AAA-listers Leonardo DiCaprio and Cameron Diaz, Gibson's Mayan epic won Friday's matinees and evenings, I'm told. At first, box office gurus were warning me that the weekend victor among three very competitive films all opening against each other would be too close to call. cameron_jude.jpgBut now I've learned it looks certain that Apocalypto will win the weekend -- bearing out my reporting back on December 1st when I was told that early tracking showed Mel's movie (playing in 2,465 theaters) would edge ahead. Tonight, I'm told Mel's movie took in nearly $6 million Friday for what's expected to be at least a $15 mil, and possibly $16 mil, weekend total -- exceeding Disney's hopes for the box office gross. That easily beats Mel's Braveheart, which made $9.9 mil for Fri-Sat-Sun when it opened in 2,037 theaters during Memorial Weekend back in 1995 ($12.9 mil for the four-day holiday) and went on to make $75.6 mil in the U.S. and $210.4 mil worldwide, helped by winning the Best Picture Oscar. Based on today's matinees, the No. 2 spot went to Sony's The Holiday (in 2,610 playdates), a date movie from director-writer Nancy Meyer, known for capturing that man-woman zeitgeist. The studio's hard work to deftly market this PG-13 debut (also starring Kate Winslet, Jack Black and Jude Law) obviously paid off because the movie earned $4.5 mil Friday despite all the rivalry. In 3rd place was Warner Bros' Blood Diamond (in 1,910 theaters), an African-set action-adventure pic. Important to note that this film is playing in 500-to-700 less theaters than the other two films...

(Excerpt) Read more at deadlinehollywooddaily.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 666; actor; apocalypto; bloodmoney; director; hollywoodrevenge; melbots; melgibson; movie; neonazi; producer; star; ungodly; wwjd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-194 next last
To: Manic_Episode
****The difference? Mel is a Christian.****

BINGO!

Remember all shiite threw at him by the 'jewish community' before Passion Of The Christ was even released or a trailer shown (maybe even while still in production, can't recall that part.) That was outright religious BIGOTRY, PREJUDICE and HATE.

Unfortunately Christians (and Catholics) don't have any storm trooper org like the ADL scrounging around for every perceived slight and then to attack in high dudgeon with bullshit accusations on every news show they can get their puss on to play their role as perpetual victim. (run on sentence rant - off)

81 posted on 12/09/2006 8:10:00 AM PST by Condor51 (Tagline Under Construction - Kindly Wear Your Hardhat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode
As far as I know, Tarentino hasn't gone gone on a drunken rant against Jews.
82 posted on 12/09/2006 8:14:50 AM PST by veronica (http://images20.fotki.com/v360/photos/1/106521/3848737/gladysPSCP-vi.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: veronica

The Passion, but I went to it anyway, not wanting to judge him and his film unfairly.
I thought that film was awful, for many reasons. I found it to be profoundly anti-semitic, and filled with untruths.

The Passion was taken from the New Testament...written by Jews, about Jesus who was a Jew and the apostles who were also Jews. So who actually is being anti-semitic?


83 posted on 12/09/2006 8:19:59 AM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Thax, it's already on my bookmark. When you read the weekly box office reports, they almost never adjust for inflation or refer to ticket sales.


84 posted on 12/09/2006 8:28:00 AM PST by carolinalivin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

I heard that on Rush too, interesting commentary by him. I have to admit because of that commentary my interest was piqued. I still am not sure if I will be seeing it or not.


85 posted on 12/09/2006 8:28:57 AM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Remember all shiite threw at him by the 'jewish community' before Passion Of The Christ was even released or a trailer shown...

Why the quotes around "jewish community?"

I have said it before and I'll say it again. Mel is a master at ginning up interest in his projects, even it means cynically using the Jewish community. HE is the one who rolled his film out by showing it to Christian groups first. HE is the one who generated controversy around the film. By the time trailers were being shown in theaters many people had already seen the film in screenings. And some - Jewish and not Jewish - didn't like it. He is also the one by the way (or his people) who claimed the Vatican had put in it's blessing on the film, and that was a lie. Mel created pre-release hype and them whined about people judging the film before they saw it. Give me a break.

AND - he proved the critics of The Passion right, when he went on his tirade again Jews.

And I thought the film stunk, as did others. Just because Mel made a film about Christ does not inoculate him against critics. He (and some here) acts as if any bad review is an affront to his brand of Christianity, which by the way, is idiosyncratic and not fully mainstream.

86 posted on 12/09/2006 8:34:33 AM PST by veronica (http://images20.fotki.com/v360/photos/1/106521/3848737/gladysPSCP-vi.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

Are you some born again type? Never understood nor desire to know that stuff. I never heard of born again in the bible. Catholics luckily are born at Baptism so we are cradle to grave Christian or Catholic whatever you call it. It is a shame that you chose fake over substance, but that is your chose no big deal to me. When you see all the Catholics going to Heaven I hope you don't regret your decision.


87 posted on 12/09/2006 8:36:08 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
I will direct you this review by Christopher Hitchens, which encapsulates my feelings about The Passion...I DETEST THIS FILM ..WITH A PASSION..

I agree with everything in this review. I hope you will take this time to read it and consider what it says.

88 posted on 12/09/2006 8:39:28 AM PST by veronica (http://images20.fotki.com/v360/photos/1/106521/3848737/gladysPSCP-vi.jpg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Yes...also...

that mother-in-laws were a pain in the a$$ back then too! LOL!!

89 posted on 12/09/2006 8:40:48 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode
""The Roman Catholic church has some questionable beliefs that are based on tradition""

Every set of individuals has a set of traditions. Pentecostals, baptists, nondenominational, mormons ... every last group no matter how big or small has traditions that aren't quite biblical. Big deal. I could make the same claim about all other churches that there beliefs don't follow the bible.

Let's not going down that road of "my church is better than yours" junk.
90 posted on 12/09/2006 8:42:17 AM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Bommer, I saw the previews, and that was enough for me. Given the descriptions in the reviews, I do not care to see it. I hope you enjoy the movie. I would not.
91 posted on 12/09/2006 8:43:31 AM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, thank you for Mozart Lover's son's safe return, and look after Jemian's son, please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle

I'm with you. I will be going to see the movie. I don't think he's nuts. I think he is just like you and me, except maybe richer. I still pray for him, his family and his sobriety.


92 posted on 12/09/2006 8:45:10 AM PST by brwnsuga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

How does an historical (with creative license) depiction show its producer's 'dark side?" Did you see Braveheart, Passion of the Christ or Patriot? Or, did you see, from other, more 'acceptable' sources, Saving Private Ryan?
All damned bloody movies, but within range of historical.

Much of our history is dark, and if some hadn't sacrificed ALL, none of us would be sitting here fat and lazy behind our computers in a free country.


93 posted on 12/09/2006 8:47:15 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

Although Tarantino's movie are violent you rarely actually see the violence. It happens just off screen. In Gibson's movies he has a fetish for showing the violwnce.


94 posted on 12/09/2006 8:53:27 AM PST by Mr. Blonde (You know, Happy Time Harry, just being around you kinda makes me want to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; veronica
I'm not interested enough in the movie to go see it. Maybe I'll rent it eventually--

Apparently Mel does gruesome even better than Tarantino and the other splatter directors, and Hollywood expires from resentful envy.

But I sure like how the "Variety" establishment types get rocked back on their arrogant heels by Mel and his antics. Squeal, whine, squawk. I love it. A subtitled movie about ancient Mayan civilization, no stars (! no pretentious political lectures by Hollywood airhead actresses! ) and it's beating the competition.

95 posted on 12/09/2006 8:57:39 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Poser
re: Nutcase or not, Mel isn't remaking old, bad movies. Hollywood is in a funk. They have had very few original ideas in the last 5 years. ))

There's a point. All the remakes of old sitcoms! Bewitched, etc. Will I Dream of Jeanie be coming soon?

There's nothing coming out of Hollywood movie studios as good (or, fun) as the television we've had recently..."Battlestar" "Lost" "Alias" "24 Hours"...it's not new-release movies I get from Netflix, it's excellent TV series.

96 posted on 12/09/2006 9:06:55 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

The liberal elite and Hollywood don't mind the violence - the reason Apocalypto is attacked is that it destroys the liberal myth of the "Noble Savage". The crimes of which liberals love to blame Western civilization for causing are shown to be practiced widely among the Mayans - slavery, human sacrifice, torture, cannibalism, ageism . . . .

I don't want to give away the details, but what saves the hero of the movie at the end (and the average Mayan) is the arrival of the Spanish on the beach with a cross. Western Christianity saves the Mayans from torture and death by the Mayan cult of death, IMO. A great movie.


97 posted on 12/09/2006 9:48:09 AM PST by Howard Jarvis Admirer (Howard Jarvis, the foe of the tax collector and friend of the California homeowner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass
You were an altar boy and say Catholics don't believe in Jesus Christ

============================

Please show me where I said any such thing.

Of couse Cathilics believe in Jesus. It's about the only part they get right, thankfully it is the most important part.

I was raised Catholic and to believe that Jesus died for my sins. It was the foundation for my faith today.

It's just that some of us build upon the foundation and others say the foundation is the entire building.

98 posted on 12/09/2006 9:53:44 AM PST by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I never heard of born again in the bible

========================

John 3:3

Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

John 3:7

Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

1 Peter 1:23

Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.

=======================

I never heard of born again in the bible

---------------

Now you have.

99 posted on 12/09/2006 9:58:12 AM PST by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm
Every set of individuals has a set of traditions. Pentecostals, baptists, nondenominational, mormons ... every last group no matter how big or small has traditions that aren't quite biblical. Big deal. I could make the same claim about all other churches that there beliefs don't follow the bible.

================

Interesting you mention momonism to justify Catholicism.
Not very discriminating or discerning.

So not following the bible is "no big deal"?

How about not following the U.S. Constitution?

Is that "no big deal" either?

100 posted on 12/09/2006 10:05:45 AM PST by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson