Not exactly the role model I'd want for a young girl.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If I hear one more word about her... I will hurl.
2 posted on
12/06/2006 10:41:56 PM PST by
BigFinn
(Isa 32:8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm sure Britney has a a competent nanny staff. Still no reason to be seen bare-bottom at the clubs.
Apparently Madonna rubbed off on her.
4 posted on
12/06/2006 10:49:45 PM PST by
oyez
(Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm sure Britney has a a competent nanny staff. Still no reason to be seen bare-bottom at the clubs.
Its a sorry shame that Madonna rubbed off on her.
5 posted on
12/06/2006 10:50:21 PM PST by
oyez
(Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"She has been photographed minus her underwear at nightclubs in Los Angeles and Las Vegas, alongside
socialites fellow skanks Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan."
There! Fixed it.
8 posted on
12/06/2006 10:56:41 PM PST by
Ignatz
("I think we should tax all foreigners living abroad.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does not wanting to see, read, or hear of her again make me a bad person? I don't want to see her dead or anything.
9 posted on
12/06/2006 10:59:04 PM PST by
KoRn
To: 2ndDivisionVet
PS: That goes for the rest of the idolized white trash of her kind as well.
11 posted on
12/06/2006 11:00:52 PM PST by
KoRn
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Welfare workers to quiz Britney (Spears) over 'parenting concerns'
14 posted on
12/07/2006 12:07:57 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey but what about the Rainbow over the Bridge George Clooney is suffering with losing his pet companion?
(no sarcasm I really care)
20 posted on
12/07/2006 1:34:08 AM PST by
Global2010
(NYer Has an awesome tag line.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The department has been calling Britney trying to set up a meeting with her, so they can check on Sean Preston and Jayden James, a source told the New York Post. I don't understand. Is there any evidence of actual abuse?
We may not like the mother, nor her lifestyle, but no one doubts that she has the cash to hire a first rate care staff along with any other millionaire.
The DCFS isn't supposed to be condemning people because they are in the headlines partying. There needs to be some rock solid evidence that some sort of abuse is taking place.
If not, they should be shot on sight for trespassing or brutally savaged by Britney's bodyguards for even thinking they have the authority to approach a situation without any evidence.
I know people who have been harassed by these people for no good reason other than spite or some wild exaggeration. They routinely overstep their authority. Sounds like this is just another example. I hope they have proof, is all.
22 posted on
12/07/2006 1:58:28 AM PST by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Somehow I think that on the scale of kids needing intervention, there's got to be a bunch of kids living in crack houses that rate higher.
Social Services, like the ATF, are afraid to go to Compton or South Central.
23 posted on
12/07/2006 2:33:36 AM PST by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
You know a child died last week in Georgia-the victim of parental abuse. Why would an agency harrass Britney Spears when there are so many legitimate cases out there.? Britney has the same rights to parent as she see fit as we all do-ridiculous.
25 posted on
12/07/2006 3:44:33 AM PST by
nyconse
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, the child sevices has been involved with Ms Spears over prior problems with the child falling.
That could be the reason for their interest rather than the bottomless photos floating around the internet.
http://news.sawf.org/Gossip/29352.aspx
26 posted on
12/07/2006 4:33:52 AM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Perdogg
Ping over here...CYS is looking at TaterTot and SmallFry's care.
Brit is out of control and she needs a wake up call...mebbe this will do the trick.
27 posted on
12/07/2006 4:37:48 AM PST by
PennsylvaniaMom
(Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
Why again are child services are investigating?

Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
37 posted on
12/07/2006 7:24:40 AM PST by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"The department has been calling Britney trying to set up a meeting with her, so they can check on Sean Preston and Jayden James, a source told the New York Post."
sheesh...
What a load of BS. In case anyone out there didn't realize, tabloids tend to print nothing but unsubstantiated rumors. They aren't what anyone would call a reliable news source.
38 posted on
12/07/2006 7:38:42 AM PST by
monday
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If she leaves her kids with a nanny and bodyguards its not clear why it makes a difference to the government what underwear she is or is not wearing while she is away from them.
44 posted on
12/07/2006 9:02:54 AM PST by
gondramB
(It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson