Gee, I thought it was the eeeeeevil Republicans who wanted to bring back the draft!
To: A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; AmericaUnite; Aussie Dasher; backinthefold; bayourant; ...
Another CNN poll. Looks like no one believes the politicians on this one. FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me and gordongekko909 if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list)
2 posted on
11/20/2006 5:16:27 PM PST by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: dynachrome
UMT makes some sense; UMS doesn't.
Problem with a large standing army of conscripts is simple ~ corrupt politicians, particularly the Democrats, will toss the troops into a large war that results in a lot of deaths without a second thought.
3 posted on
11/20/2006 5:16:46 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: dynachrome
No.
Isn't it obvious, that they want a draft to stir up opposition to the war? The intention is to re-create the Vietnam scenario, at least to some extent. But everyone knows it's just a lot of hype, Democratic B.S.
They don't like a volunteer army because the vast majority of the people fighting actually support the war.
6 posted on
11/20/2006 5:28:15 PM PST by
PatrickF4
To: dynachrome
If the dems are in charge, a draft will have to be instituted. No one would volunteer to fight for a group of nut jobs that have no clear goal in mind and who will abandonen the military at the drop of a hat.
7 posted on
11/20/2006 5:36:36 PM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: dynachrome
Rangel served during the Korean "War."
Truman said, in 1950, that he was sending our troops on a "police action" in Korea to deal with "bandits."
During the remaining three years that Democratic Truman was president (1950-52), 30,000 US troops lost their lives in Korea.
9 posted on
11/20/2006 5:56:08 PM PST by
syriacus
(Millions in South Korea are free because 30,000 US troops DIED in 3 years under TRUMAN.)
To: All
Would someone mind explaining to me why I should feel good the end of the draft created the environment that brought about both women in combat and homosexuals serving in any military capacity? Don't misinterpret my questions. I'm entirely cognizant our military would be woefully undermanned this moment if special accommodations hadn't been made for women, homosexuals, and also non-citizens that comprise 4 to 5 percent of our military force now.
Since this issue has been highly politicized, it would be most appropriate a Republican defend the abandonment of conservative principles that were opposed to women in combat and homosexuals in the military specifically.
Seems to me we tossed the baby with the bath water.
11 posted on
11/20/2006 5:59:46 PM PST by
backtothestreets
(Jesus IS my prayer partner. Invite Jesus to pray with you too.)
To: dynachrome
How ludicrous. The same patriotic heroes will enlist as always.
Of course, the population of Canada will double overnight. I say good riddance. Don't come back.
12 posted on
11/20/2006 6:49:48 PM PST by
OldFriend
(FALLEN HERO JEFFREY TOCZYLOWSKI, REST IN PEACE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson