Skip to comments.
Lieberman(R)
Posted on 11/08/2006 6:29:28 PM PST by Raebie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: Dilbert San Diego
Ben Nelson from NE would be the only one I can think of as he votes with the Republicans more then the DemocRATs.
61
posted on
11/08/2006 6:47:50 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
( Go Sooners! Thanks Aggies for your 12th Man!)
To: mysterio
Not even Majority Leader? (I don't think it will happen either.)
62
posted on
11/08/2006 6:51:11 PM PST
by
Ingtar
(Prensa dos para el ingles)
To: Raebie
Are we talking about the same rabid, liberal senator that ran on a ticket with Al Gore? Lieberman is a die-hard LIB/RAT/BA$TARD that happened to "get it" concerning the war. Nothing else. Why the he11 would we want him in the GOP? I don't even want the RINO's and am glad that Dewine/Chaffee are gone and the rest will fall soon. We need to start differentiating between a Republican and a CONSERVATIVE. The blurring of the lines is what "We The People" just sent packing with hat in hand. IMO, of course.
63
posted on
11/08/2006 6:53:33 PM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If a pug barks and no one is around to hear it... they hold a grudge for a long time!)
To: SunStar
Run. From now on Lieberman can coast through any election.
He's untouchable.
Why even mount a campaign against him. If you beat him in the primary. So what. He'll run and as he has proven, still win.
64
posted on
11/08/2006 6:53:40 PM PST
by
proudpapa
(of three.)
To: Raebie
Admitting to a problem is the first step.
Lissen - Lieberman is a lib. He is now a majority maker. He will caucus with the Dems to get committee assignments.
Politics 101.
Thank me
65
posted on
11/08/2006 6:53:42 PM PST
by
don-o
(Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
To: Raebie
I think he should. He owes us one but he won't.
To: don-o
What is more likely is that Bush would appoint Lieberman to some cabinet position, thus allowing the Republican governor to appoint a replacement. I'm surprised that Joe is not the new SOD.
To: beckysueb
He should run for majority leader with an unspoken implication that he would flip if he didn't get it. The Dems have some appeasement to do re: Joe.
To: Asceticon
69
posted on
11/08/2006 7:02:45 PM PST
by
don-o
(Proudly posting without reading the thread since 1998. (stolen from one cool dude))
To: Raebie
You forgot what the 2000 election was about, did'nt you.
70
posted on
11/08/2006 7:02:54 PM PST
by
hope
(11/08/06 : The American Government is now broken.)
To: Raebie
When hell freezes over...maybe.
71
posted on
11/08/2006 7:04:14 PM PST
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: zarf
"Joe will be interesting to watch. He will not be in the mood to play ball with anyone. He WILL be independent. He's a changed man and has made more than a few Republican friends this year.
He will surprise."
No he won't. Not according to a radio interview I heard with him earlier this week here in CT. He said he was a Democrat.
72
posted on
11/08/2006 7:06:20 PM PST
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: feedback doctor
"So you think there's a chance."
none. Not even 1%. Read my previous post. He was adamant.
73
posted on
11/08/2006 7:07:39 PM PST
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: Raebie
But I'm wondering...any chance he might flip?<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I was thinking those exact words...stranger things have happened. I wouldn't bet on it, but it would be sweet justice.
74
posted on
11/08/2006 7:09:16 PM PST
by
Mjaye
To: Dilbert San Diego
No DINO senators will switch to repub that I know of. I'm sure Lieberman will be more independent minded than before, but with dems in charge, he will probably vote with them most of the time to keep his issues from getting flushed.
75
posted on
11/08/2006 7:09:38 PM PST
by
mysterio
Comment #76 Removed by Moderator
To: Raebie
Good evening.
No. Loserman is a DemocRAT and he will caucus with them, no matter what party he is claiming to be part of.
Michael Frazier
77
posted on
11/08/2006 7:14:53 PM PST
by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: Raebie
I see why you posted the thread; you were just thinking out loud, brainstorming a way to pick up a seat. Keep your head up.
78
posted on
11/08/2006 7:15:02 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: oust the louse
He's going to be completely beholden to the Democrats in Washington, despite their treachery against him and despite the fact that he owes his victory entirely to GOP voters.
He can't keep his seniority in the U.S. Senate unless he caucuses with the Democrats -- and without his seniority he's completely useless to Connecticut.
79
posted on
11/08/2006 7:18:47 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Raebie
I take it you are not familiar with his voting record outside of the war effort. In 2005, only a few scored lower in voting with conservative values. In 2004, he scored as low as Ted Kennedy, 0 out of 100.
http://www.acuratings.org/
80
posted on
11/08/2006 7:20:22 PM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson