Posted on 09/12/2006 10:51:48 PM PDT by dangus
The era of the free-masons.
Between 1937 and 1958, an amazing succession of publicly Masonic Supreme Court justices were appointed to the Supreme Court. Collectively, they radicalized American politics. Since their ascension, it can truly be said that every major socio-political change in America has been brought about by judicial, rather than legislative, means. They utterly dominated the Supreme Court during the Warren, Stone, and Vinson courts (1941-1969.) At times, as many as eight of the nine justice were Masonic.
The following is a listing of Masonic US Supreme Court justices appointed in the last 70 years. This is no conspiracy theory; all were very publicly Masonic. Allegations of covert Masonry (such as Ronald Reagan and Dwight Eisenhower) have been rejected for the purposes of this list.
Hugo Black (1937-1971)
S. F. Reed (1938-1957)
William Douglas (1939-1975)
Robert Jackson (1941-1954)
James Byrnes (1941-1942)
Wiley Rutledge (1943-1949)
Harold Burton (1945-1958)
Fred Vinson (1946-1953)
Tom C. Clark (1949-1967)
Sherman Minton (1949-1956)
Earl Warren (1953-1969)
John Marshall Harlan (1955-1971)
Potter Stewart (1958-1981)
Also, Thurgood Marshall (1968-1991) was a freemason.
Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?
Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five are Catholic: Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Sam Alito. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg is not likely a freemason, nor is there credible evidence linking the other liberals to masonry.)
Unlike Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson, John Kennedy was also not masonic. His appointments, Abe Fortas (1962-1965), and Byron White (1962-1993) were the only non-radical-leftists for several years on the court. Nixon, a Quaker, was also non-Masonic; Burger, while still liberal, was decidedly more moderate than his colleagues. Rehnquist was decidedly conservative. Unfortunately, the Senate blocked further conservatives, resulting in the selection of Lewis Powell, Jr.
Gerald Ford was a Freemason, and his selection, John Paul Stevens, while not publicly Masonic, continued the radical policies of prior freemasons. Was Stevens simply covertly Masonic? Sources alleging he was are not reliable, but his ties are definite.
Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?
Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five non-liberals are Catholic: conservatives Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Sam Alito, and moderate Anthony Kennedy. (Clarence Thomas was not Catholic when he was appointed, but was Catholic previously and is currently Catholic.) All four solidly conservative justices have been linked to an anti-Masonic, Catholic group.
Ahhhh.
Thanks for the insight.
I sort of enjoy words.
By the way, I'm strident at times too.
;-)
IIRC, I rather tend to like your strident.
Thx.
;-)
Mine can, too, at times. Though that's not my intent! LOL.
Bill will be directly to the right of the word "narcissist".
You used such nice examples. I would have gone with b versus c. B would trigger a strident response, while c would make me downright shrill.
b= 5 letter word, also denotes a female dog. Someone calls me a b, I may respond with, "yeah, so tell me something I don't know."
c= 4 letter word, no also denotes anything. Someone calls me a c & I will be plotting how to draw their blood.
;-)
I must say ....... quite soon a picture of 'The Red Marxist Queen of The Universe' (Hillary) will be placed directly to the right of the word "shrill" in all fine dictionaries.
= = = =
That would be very gratifying.
But I mostly want folks to REALIZE IN THE DEPTHS OF THEIR SOUL AND THE BEST OF THEIR MINDS that
her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous--Bw*tch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de Machiavelli de Marx de Stalin de Pol Pot de Arafart de Castro de Power Monger . . . de Sade is all those things and worse.
Yeah, Dillbo Billdo Dilldo Klintoon is at least a paragon example of a narcissist. He's probably even proud of that.
LOL.
Thanks for your kind exchanges.
I think I may have mixed you up with someone who dialogues with me on some of the prophecy etc. sorts of threads.
Ah well. I tend to be pretty clueless about most freeper names. Sorry.
I like your list, here are a few more:
The Queen of Darkness
Hillary Rotten Clinton
Hitlery
Hag-dad Hillary
Her Royal Thighness
Chappaqua Rose
Lady in Pink
Machiavellian Mama
The Hildebeast
Wide Load
Rodham Hussein
Fat Bottomed Girl
Hillarywho
The Red Marxist Queen of the Universe
Pantload
Satan's Daughter
UtterFailure
Hillarrhea
HielHitlery
Hilla the Hun
The Lady MacBeth of Little Rock
Mrs. Bent One
Ms. Clintigula
Madame Hamhocks
I watched about 10 minutes of Justice Thomas' confirmation hearings, then I realized that it was a witch hunt and that I had better things to do than shout at a TV (back then there was no forum like FR to help). I'm not really surprised that he is Catholic (aside from the fact that few blacks from his generation were raised Catholic), his judicial philosophy is totally consistent with those of most conservative Catholics.
More exact would be theocrats vs the First Amendment -- that which prevents a sharia-type political system here.
Now comes a possible explanation. Yesterday I noticed a new thread on FR dealing with some pedophile defrocked Catholic priests in Philadelphia getting together with some of their past victims to discuss the matter. A bit of distraction and diversion going on in FR?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1700915/posts
Man, that is cool!
"Hence my interest in the name "Eastern Star.""
You did catch my post that the name "Eastern Star" is a direct reference to Christ, right, as in Matthew 2:2?
Yes, I read that, thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.