for those who have been following this, hope the material is of interest.
1 posted on
09/01/2006 6:36:29 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...
All, here's a ping to the latest material on the Chinese Navy.
Education is one key to avoding...
future trouble with Red China
...and then of course acting on that knowledge). I believe that Red China represents a threat and trouble in the next 5-10 years greater than the tyrants we fought in World War II.
2 posted on
09/01/2006 6:41:04 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Jeff Head
It interests me, but only in a vague, why are we granting MFN, and sitting still while the Chinese are committing economic warfare against us kinda way. I suppose they need a deep sea Navy, to defend the coastland against the Tibetan fleet.
3 posted on
09/01/2006 6:43:00 PM PDT by
jeremiah
(Our military are not "fodder", but fathers and mothers and sons and daughters.)
To: Jeff Head
6 posted on
09/01/2006 6:47:12 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Jeff Head
10 posted on
09/01/2006 6:55:30 PM PDT by
uncbob
To: Jeff Head
16 posted on
09/01/2006 7:09:29 PM PDT by
Badray
(While defending the land called America, we must also be sure to preserve the Idea called America.)
To: Jeff Head
Some report prepared for Rummy says that China's fleet buildup is for protecting their petroleum supplies from the U.S.!!! I dunno 'bout that. Self-defense could be used as an excuse to hide aggressive notions.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050117-115550-1929r.htm
"China is building up military forces and setting up bases along sea lanes from the Middle East to project its power overseas and protect its oil shipments, according to a previously undisclosed internal report prepared for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld...."
20 posted on
09/01/2006 7:41:45 PM PDT by
vincentjay
(I'm convinced that Bill Clinton is most-likely to be revealed as the anti-christ.)
To: Jeff Head
36 posted on
09/02/2006 11:40:48 AM PDT by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: SeaDragon
The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia ping.
43 posted on
09/02/2006 4:17:54 PM PDT by
humblegunner
(If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
To: Jeff Head
Ed Dames said China will become the dominant superpower fairly soon by purely economic means and won't have to fire a shot.
50 posted on
09/04/2006 8:13:06 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: joanie-f; LS; Grampa Dave; soundbits; Noumenon; Lurker; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; ...
Thoughts on this latest update to Red China's growing naval capabilities? Click on the picture in the body of the initial post to go to the site and see the whole thing.
They continue to build very modern, new combatants at a break neck speed. By comparison, since 2000 they have added 72 new major combatants to their fleet. We have added 39, but also decomissioned 45, about 30 of which had ten or more good years of service life left in them.
Anyhow, I would be interested in your thoughts.
56 posted on
09/05/2006 7:29:57 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Jeff Head
The photo of the Type 039 passing between Kowloon and HK Island is chilling.
The missile cats appear to leverage a dual use concept also used for many of the high speed ferries being develope indigenously.
69 posted on
09/06/2006 4:44:28 PM PDT by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: Jeff Head; Doug Fiedor; forest
jeff, thanks for the heads up.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson