Skip to comments.
Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologiesHolocaust was fallout of evolution theory
World Net Daily ^
| Posted: August 19, 2006
| World Net Daily
Posted on 08/19/2006 6:39:43 AM PDT by RaceBannon
Show links Darwin, Hitler ideologies Holocaust was fallout of evolution theory, says new production
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: August 19, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Charles Darwin should share with Hitler the blame for the 11 million or more lives lost in the Holocaust, a new television special explains. And, the program says, the more than 45 million American lives lost to abortion also can be blamed on that famous founder of evolutionary theory.
The results of Darwins theories
"This show basically is about the social effects of Darwinism, and shows this idea, which is scientifically bankrupt, has probably been responsible for more bloodshed than anything else in the history of humanity," Jerry Newcomb, one of two co-producers, told WorldNetDaily.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anothercrevothread; bravosierra; christianmythology; crevolist; darwin; ecclesspinniningrave; enoughalready; eugenics; evolution; fakeatheistgay; fascistfrannie; foolishness; genesisidolater; islamicnazis; keywordwars; liesaboutdarwin; mntlslfabusethread; mythology; pavlovian; superstition; warongenesis; wingnutdaily; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 701-709 next last
To: Coyoteman
My response was that we are not bashing religious folks When they are as divorced from reality as those of the Creationist stripe are wont to be, a little bashing is not entirely unwarranted. Labeling a psychopathology as "religious" in order to get a pass on criticism doesn't do anyone any favors. Tom Cruise doesn't get a free ticket to acceptance just because he calls his fruitcake delusions a "religion", and neither should the reality deniers of the Creationist persuasion.
To: stands2reason
Just leave science alone.When any science is built upon a false premise, you cannot defend it... but keep trying... you'll sound just like a religionist...
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
How would evolutionists feel about teaching that life came from outer space?Panspermia is an hypothesis. I wouldn't teach it 'til college.
363
posted on
08/20/2006 5:09:34 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: stands2reason
Genesis is not the basis for all human morality...Morality is rooted entirely in the presupposition that some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior...
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
I don't see how panspermia nor BB theory equals "born without sin" as Mary was according to "immaculate conception."
(I hope it's not too embarrassing to have a non-Christian correct your idea of the meaning of IC...)
365
posted on
08/20/2006 5:13:30 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: Dante Alighieri
You touch on some good and interesting points at the end of this post. I take the unpredictability and general inaccessibility of particle matter as another sign of intelligent design, which leaves open a means for direct intervention upon the processes we study, thus making possible physical anomalies, free will, and a host of other potentials that cannot and will not be realized apart from intelligent design.
To: stands2reason
Genesis is not the basis for... the idea of anti-homosexuality.The axiomatic state of human reproductive biology... Nature does not care...
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
morality and all of the associated ideals rest entirely on the presupposition some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior...No. It. Doesn't.
I simply question the entire illogical premise of evolutionary theory... that life originated from this planet...
That is not evolutionary theory. Try again.
368
posted on
08/20/2006 5:19:21 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: VadeRetro
Hard to believe any kin would let this particular Crazy Uncle any where near their kids unsupervised. But then, if you let them loose and make sure they stay away from you kids, I guess some think they're useful.
369
posted on
08/20/2006 5:19:24 PM PDT
by
ml1954
(ID = Case closed....no further inquiry allowed...now move along.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
In no way has intelligent design been scientifically shown to be supernatural. Nor has the connection between intelligent design and intelligibility been scientifically challenged in the slightest. Furthermore, the very existence of chemicals that behave according to laws is ample evidence of intelligent design. These statements are enough to ignore you from here on out. Your fimgers in your ears and intoning "nya nya nya" indicate you are willfully ignorant and have every intention of staying that way.
370
posted on
08/20/2006 5:19:54 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: RaceBannon
Usually it's the liberals who lie, but there are always exceptions ...
"Charles Darwin should share with Hitler the blame for the 11 million or more lives lost in the Holocaust."
Regarding the piece linking Hitler to Darwin.
This is PURE GARBAGE that is no better then the rot that gets "produced" by Moveon.Org and similar narrow minded hate groups that compare George Bush to Hitler.
For anyone interested in doing some real research, read the diaries of Darwin's journey of discovery, "The Voyage of the Beagle." Darwin is absolutely horrified by the slavery and cruelty to other humans he witnesses. In this case, it's the Spaniards enslaving the native American Indians. One of the last entries before he reaches England, is about this.
Yes, evil people have perverted Darwin's concept of Natural Selection as an explanation of evolution (a concept debated since the time of the ancient Greeks), but only the ignorant will blame Darwin, just as they blame Bush.
World Net Daily, who's banner reads "Truth" about 9/11, is in deep need of soul searching for it's spread of this type of ignorance.
To: Fester Chugabrew
Fester, you are a caricature of yourself.
You take organized matter as a sign of intelligent design and you take "unpredictability and general inaccessibility of particle matter as another sign of intelligent design." Do you actually read the stuff you post, or are you an ELIZA program?
[ELIZA: A program which can be taught to respond to sentences typed by a user in a way that can give the illusion of understanding them, but which in fact relies on pattern matching and substitution to produce answers based on a pre determined set of stock phrases.]
372
posted on
08/20/2006 5:20:43 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: stands2reason
I don't see how panspermia nor BB theory equals "born without sin" as Mary was according to "immaculate conception." You never took a literature class? Capitalization of proper nouns makes all the difference in English...
To: freedumb2003
374
posted on
08/20/2006 5:22:14 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: stands2reason
No. It. Doesn't.Punctuation does also...
To: RaceBannon
"Stalin's Communism is based on evolution."
According to George Orwell, Stalin's Communism is based on absolute political power. I've read dozens of Orwell's political essays, and no where does he mention Darwin or Evolution as the source of communist ideology.
"You misspeak quite so."
Apparently so do you.
To: stands2reason
In Chat, no one can hear you Rant ;)
377
posted on
08/20/2006 5:25:24 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: George - the Other
Finally, a legitimate critic of the article itself and legitimate criticism of the one who posted the thread...
Thank-you.
To: stands2reason
Morality and all of the associated ideals rest entirely on the presupposition some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior...
Try using logic, the foundation of all the sciences...
To: Coyoteman
I (like most of Western science that seeks purpose, function, order and the like) start with the assumption of intelligent design. Who does not design an animate object without taking care for contingencies and allowing a way to intervene in the course of that object's history?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 701-709 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson