Posted on 08/16/2006 4:35:14 PM PDT by varyouga
See post #348 and answer the question.
That could be true, but honestly we have people in and out of family gatherings at Christmas. Of Course I would notice if my husband was not there and would remember it forever.
No way, it was all over the news in Georgia. Alabama is right next door.
I think the "gayish guy" hanging on to him is a Thai policeman.
Again, what is wrong with questioning the importance of a story? It's not like I kept after people about this, except to defend myself.
What else is he lying about?
And for the record, he has been returned to the US, and has stated that he did, in fact, kill her. He says he was "in love with her" and that it was an "accident."
I know how this must hurt you and some of the other Ramsey-haters to have to admit that they were totally innocent, but this guy did it, and admits it. The dna tests have already been run (this has been in the works for months).
Get over it.
Your comments to my post are becoming even more absurd as additional information today comes to light. He (the alleged perp) is still in Thailand, no DNA has been processed yet ... and it is becoming ever more clear this guy is nut case, even the Boulder authorities are beginning to hedge their bet. What say ye now???
I guess an apology is out of the question? Right?
I think the "gayish guy" hanging on to him is a Thai policeman.
Maybe they just have close Thais?
parsy, who is enjoying his Dr. Pepper and Parrot Bay Rum way too much.
I don't apologize for the items I listed in my post. They are as I learned them, and except for the dna, could still be true.
However, I do apologize for saying it so rudely. I'm sorry about that.
The one in the Hawaiian type shirt?
Oh, well--it IS Thailand.
ROFL!
Law enforcement officers always consider the parents or spouse/significant other of murder victums to be the killer unless there is a lot of evidence pointing to another person.
For this reason if my husband or one of my children ever turns up murdered I will immediately hire an attorney.
The problem is LEOs are told it is always someone close and that stranger murders are rare. There have been many, many child murders that do turn out to be committed by a stranger. Of all the high profile child abductions and murders in the news since Jon Benet, it seems to me all have been stranger murders. I now wonder how many innocent parents and spouses have been convicted in this country prior to DNA and other advances in testing evidence.
I think they have one test already completed. Now we have to have a properly witnessed and certified test....in other words, a back up test from a second "independent" lab. There can be no mistakes for a conviction.
His whole life is a lie....from the embellishments in his resume to the death of his newborn little girls named Angel and Innocence.
That is not for certain. LHO hung out with David Ferrie who was definately gay. Some claim there was a relationship...............
There's more than one book. I suggest you look at evidence from the other perspective. It might change your mind. The Ramsey's did initially cooperate. It was when it became apparent that the police were focusing on them, and only on them, that they ceased being coorperative.
Is this the same book that claimed Patsy was angry at JonBenet for wetting the bed, and used scattered pullups in the room as evidence of Patsy's guilt?
Yes, Steve Thomas' book "JonBenet". HIS perspective was that of an experienced detective working in a sea of incompetence and special interest. The physical evidence, the inconsistencies in statements, and the Ramsey's very evasive behaviour led him and a whole lot of other cops to focus on Patsy Ramsey as the main suspect. Their behavior also caused hundreds of millions of other people around the world to view them as the main, or only, suspects, too. This behavior thing of theirs was far more compelling than what physical evidence existed.
As a lifetime reader of crime stories and a student of human behavior (I'm 58), I could see no fault with Thomas' investigative technique or the conclusions he drew from what he found and observed. Could Patsy Ramsey been wrongly convicted on the circumstantial evidence alone? Yes, she could have been. That's why I hope to hell this Karr guy pans out as the real killer. BUT, during Thomas' year and a half on the case in the beginning, there was no other really viable suspect in sight except Patsy Ramsey.
Other books have been written by "outsiders" who came along later and had to make do with interviewing participants who may have had more than a little incentive to cover their butts for earlier missteps. I believe Steve Thomas' perspective as a street cop working the scene and trying to conduct a proper investigation in the face of incredible obstruction was the correct perspective. He became so frustrated with how improperly his own chief and DA's office were obstructing the investigation that he quit police work.
I third that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.