Did you see the other gayish dude hanging onto his arm during the entire interview?
He slightly resembles another famous murderer, who was not gay.
Posted on 08/16/2006 4:35:14 PM PDT by varyouga
Just breaking on KUSA-TV in Denver that the suspect arrested today in the case matches the DNA at the crime scene. Nothing on the web yet...
He went through the window is an assumption at this point. Broke it and went through it is two different things. Killers can be unbelievably clever.
That was a very good "find". It's what provokes thinking "outside the box". Thank you. Every little "insight" helps.
Okay, but the broken window is the supposed "proof" that it was an intruder and not a family member. It's not proof if he didn't go through it.
One of the problems with pretty children is that get a lot of attention. Some of them become "overbrave". Never mind the star thing.
Family Christmases are almost always time for photos. In 1996, I don't know if the camera would be digital or not but, if so, the photos should have some sort of time stamp. Even if they were not, had they been developed the old fashioned way, there is normally some sort of stamp on the back.
It might not explain everything but it would go a long way to establishing whether he was indeed with family at Christmastime. Without a time stamp, it probably doesn't have an *exact* time to fit into a timeline but it could be used to establish location.
Moreso, I think the prosecution needs to PROVE he was in Boulder at the time of the crime more than the defense has to prove he wasn't.
What are you , 8 years old. The window wasn't broken. The latch was faulty. And no one thing constitutes " proof " that it was an intruder. There is also a palm print, a boot print, dna evidence and a wealth of info from the autopsy report. Have you READ ANYTHING about this case?
FWIW, I don't recall the JBR murder case reaching critical mass until early January. Unless you lived in the Denver area, this was just a local crime during the first days so somebody in Alabama would be hard pressed to remember "yes, we were at so-and-so's Christmas party when we heard that little girl was murdered." They'd need to remember Christmas 1996 for some other reason. Actually, for a wife with three small children of her own, it might not be that difficult to remember a Christmas where the hubby wasn't home.
See my post 367. I don't think it would have been a topic of a Christmas conversation.
How bout you RTE66, you want to answer the question?
Going to lunch now, back in an hour.
Does the family have Christmas pics with the guy in them from the 25th and 26th?
Now, that more has coming to light, looks like the headline of this thread is FALSE.
It has not been announced, as yet, if the suspect's DNA matches the DNA found on the child's clothing.
I hate to think that Freepers will read this headline and be misinformed.
His online resume might provide a starting point. This guy got around.
I'm not sure, but they had plenty of offers. For the record, I still think John and Patsy did it..this freak may have been there also
What kind of dingbat prosecutor makes an arrest before the major evidence has been tested?
I don't think they have as much evidence as we were led to believe..(Please God..let there be his DNA)..
sw
This guy, John Karr, looks light in the loafers to me. I can't believe, after seeing him on TV, that he would be interested in females of any age.
Did you see the other gayish dude hanging onto his arm during the entire interview?
sw
Did you see the other gayish dude hanging onto his arm during the entire interview?
He slightly resembles another famous murderer, who was not gay.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.