Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Computer Associates Profits Crash (Will Let Go of 1,700)
The Register ^ | Tuesday 15th August 2006 | Chris Williams

Posted on 08/15/2006 9:33:19 AM PDT by nickcarraway

Business software giant CA is to cull 1,700 of its workforce. News of the massive restructure came as the firm released its Q1 2007 results and reported a 64 per cent drop in net income compared to the same period in 2006.

About half the cull will take place in North America, with the rest drawn from global operations. In all, 10.5 per cent of CA staffers are for the chop. Execs hope the plan, which is to be completed in 2008, will save the firm $200m annually. The redundancies themselves will cost the firm $200m.

Revenues were actually up slightly on the same period last year, rising from $927m to $956m, but net income sank to $35m, delivering GAAP earnings per share of $0.06, although they topped analyst estimates of $0.03. CA made a loss of $36m in Q4 2006.

CEO John Swainson, the man tasked with hauling the company back from years of accounting scandals, losses, top execs admitting fraud, and a revolving boardroom door, said: "We are not satisfied with our cost structure and we are implementing an expense reduction plan to improve the company’s efficiency and competitive position. These are the first steps in a long-term program to achieve a best-of-breed cost structure."

CA did not update its annual revenue forecast of $3.9bn, made on 29 June, but expects to do so when it reports its Q2 numbers.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: business; computerassociates; software
Anyone from CA who is looking for a job is welcome to Freepmail me. Especially people from Ilumin.
1 posted on 08/15/2006 9:33:19 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Ping


2 posted on 08/15/2006 9:33:33 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

3 posted on 08/15/2006 9:37:16 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
It's Linux's fault!

IB4GE

:-/

4 posted on 08/15/2006 9:37:40 AM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I just don't understand business. How does laying off 1,700 people save 200 million every year. They sure must have been paying them allot! lol
5 posted on 08/15/2006 10:28:49 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
How does laying off 1,700 people save 200 million every year.

Let's round it up to 2,000 for easy math. That's 100,000 per person - not unreasonable for hi-tech salaries and overhead per person.

6 posted on 08/15/2006 10:30:20 AM PDT by dirtboy (This tagline has been photoshopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
How does laying off 1,700 people save 200 million every year.

200,000,000 / 1700 = ~$117,647. Given salaries, office space, benefits, equipment, etc. I'd say they are fairly accurate.

7 posted on 08/15/2006 10:41:44 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Makes sense.


8 posted on 08/15/2006 11:33:26 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
CA software SUX. It doe not integrate well in and amongst it's own product lines and requires bazzillions of high priced "Consultant Hours" to make it even passably workable.
9 posted on 08/15/2006 2:33:40 PM PDT by roaddog727 (Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Ahhh...the dot.com smoke & mirrors continues.....LOL.


10 posted on 08/15/2006 9:53:51 PM PDT by Khurkris (When the levee breaks there'll be no place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

What does CA even do nowadays. Its been probably 6-7 years since I have used any of their products. Ah I see from their website that they do the eTrust thing. Haven't used that, but have heard good things.


11 posted on 08/15/2006 11:09:49 PM PDT by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727
CA software SUX. It doe not integrate well in and amongst it's own product lines and requires bazzillions of high priced "Consultant Hours" to make it even passably workable.

Har. Hire CSC sometime. They're so far up the fed's butt they don't care if the work sux, you sue, they lose or what. They'll always make it up on one fed contract or another. And -- they're really evil.

12 posted on 08/16/2006 5:58:20 AM PDT by banjo joe (Work the angles. Show all work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson