Posted on 08/05/2006 4:49:22 PM PDT by Pokey78
SUPERSTAR Tom Cruise has joined the ranks of the unemployed. The Hollywood studio that bankrolls his films is not backing any more Cruise movies until he agrees to a significant paycut.
The 44-year-old actor is eager to get back to work to put behind him disappointments such as Mission Impossible: III, but last week his 13-year deal with the Paramount studio was allowed to lapse. Executives say Cruise faces a “financial adjustment and reality check” before he can continue his illustrious career.
Cruise fans fears that, unless the hardworking actor learns some humility, an illustrious career which has matured from the cocky boy of Risky Business and Top Gun to more naunced performances in The Last Samurai and Collateral may burn out. “Right now,” said an insider close to the negotiations, “he is simply too expensive to employ.”
Cruise is not the only star to suffer as Hollywood bosses cut jobs and get tough with expensive talent. Jim Carrey, Mike Myers and Reese Witherspoon are all “on holiday” with no immediate film in prospect, while Brad Pitt recently took a pay cut to play Jesse James.
Last week, soon after the arrest of Mel Gibson for drink driving, the studio crackdown reached younger actors such as Lindsay Lohan.
Lohan was publicly censured by her employers for refusing to put her work above her social life. Her mother said it was an “ungallant” attack on her 20-year-old, daughter who was just a “good girl enjoying herself”.
Studio executives are increasingly frustrated by hit films that leave them impoverished because the stars, as well as directors such as Steven Spielberg, have grabbed the biggest share of the profits. Cruise has become a symbol of the battle for power between studios and their stars, a struggle that dates back to 1919 when Charlie Chaplin set up his own studio, United Artists, to keep the lion’s share of profits from his silent comedies for himself.
Studios are feeling more bullish because many summer hits, from Cars to Superman Returns, have been driven by strong scripts and computer effects rather than celebrities.
Yet by all standards Cruise is a special case. For 20 years the diminutive star has earned the studios billions of pounds. Last year, according to Forbes magazine, he earned £35m from War of the Worlds, still a Hollywood record.
Since 1992 Paramount has paid Cruise-Wagner Productions, Cruise’s private film development company, up to £7m a year to base its office on the Paramount lot in Los Angeles. It also paid for 10 staff. In return Paramount gets the first bite at any Cruise film. Paramount has now refused to renew the deal on its current terms, effectively suspending its work on half a dozen future Cruise films.
Cruise, whose fortune is conservatively estimated at £250m, is meanwhile paying staff out of his own pocket and remains confident it will soon be “business as usual” at Cruise-Wagner Productions. But the abrupt demise of the current deal remains an embarrassing psychological blow after a turbulent year for “the Cruiser”.
Thomas Cruise Mapother IV has been battling to hold on to public affections since he decided to shed Pat Kingsley, his long-term publicity adviser who for years shielded him from controversy.
Kingsley would never have allowed him to appear on the Oprah Winfrey television show and jump on top of the couch while declaring his love for the young actress Katie Holmes.
However, that did not affect his popularity as much as criticising Brooke Shields, the actress, for using prescription medicines to ease her post-natal depression: as a Scientologist, Cruise disapproves of all psychological drugs.
“At that moment he moved from the realm of eccentricity to something scary and cruel,” said Martin Kaplan, director of the Norman Lear Center which studies how films affect society. “It was easier to forgive jokes about eating placenta than what is perceived to be an attack on a vulnerable woman’s real problem.”
Hollywood studios are influenced by Q Scores, an annual poll of a celebrity’s likeability. In the last poll the percentage of Americans who liked Cruise fell from 30% two years ago to 19%, while people who disliked him jumped from 14% to 31%. The next Q Score, due to be released confidentially to the studios next month, is expected to be even worse.
Henry Schaffer, of Marketing Evaluations, which carries out the Q Score polls, said that Cruise has suffered in particular with young women, especially compared with more low-profile stars such as Tom Hanks. “The two Toms used to be neck-and-neck at the top of the Hollywood tree, but the more flamboyant Tom is in danger of crash and burn,” he said.
Schaffer said that Gibson, who is facing drink-driving charges and more intangible damage related to his anti-Jewish outburst when he was arrested in Malibu on July 28, had recently been recovering in public esteem from the extremely divisive release of his last film, The Passion of the Christ.
“This could be a big blow,” said Schaffer. He added that before Gibson’s forthcoming court appearance he should “do a Hugh Grant”: go on American television and apologise directly and with a light touch.
Cruise is a tougher problem, according to Hollywood spin doctors. One former public relations adviser to the actor said that Cruise had two options: defensive or aggressive.
First, he should cultivate a quieter lifestyle. “He should come across as humble, not judgmental, even if it is the best acting he has ever done — because inside he is still a cocky boy, but the times have changed,” said the former aide.
Then, when the time is right, he should make a positive splash with his baby daughter Suri and her mother, Holmes.
While Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt demanded a £2.2m charity donation from People magazine for the first shots of their offspring, Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt, Suri has been invisible except to a close circle that includes Penélope Cruz, Cruise’s ex-girlfriend. Although Tussauds is already showing a waxen effigy of a bundled Suri in New York, the public is impatient to see pictures of the real baby, born last April.
American tabloid magazines are offering up to £3m for the first snap. Insiders suggest that any baby pictures might be wrapped up into a wedding celebration for Cruise and his 27-year-old girlfriend.
This is not expected to happen until Cruise has sorted out his employment prospects. Like Bruce Willis and Harrison Ford who have confirmed they are returning after a series of flops for a fourth chapter of their Die Hard and Indiana Jones franchises, that may depend on what films he wants to make.
One studio executive joked: “He can get all his perks back when he agrees to make Top Gun 2, in a jet, wearing an oxygen mask. Tom Cruise will have to finally shut up when he is saving the world.”
Did you see the Last Samarai? What about Collateral? Or War of the World? He was great in all three of those films.
I forgot about The Last Samarai but it was a good movie.
This girl will marry at age 13 just for the potential name change.
Tom Cruise is an actor? Jimmy Stewart was an Actor. Humphrey Borart was an Actor. Cary Grant was an Actor. Even John Wayne and Roy Rogers and Trigger were actors. Tom Cruise is at best a model; posing through one scene after another.
And he was also good in The Minority Report.
I think the guy is kinda weird personally, but he's a good actor.
And are any of the actors you named still alive to make movies?
Besides, scientology is a cult with lots of really really sicko ideas....and it's a big part of hollyweirdo....shed it cause the people who pay have stopped playing...and paying...
The Passion of the Christ was only poor in Hollyweirdo's eyes....did hollyweirdo by any chance see how much Mel Gibson made with that movie??? Made him a very wealthy man and the people that pay LOVED IT!!!! See you're still out of touch...out of touch businesses as in hollyweirdo...go belly up!!!
Tom....now's the time for you to "come out of the closet"
Hollywood will LOVE you again!
Xenu will not be mocked.
Warner Bros will do okay. They are going to release movies on DVD, blu ray, and HD DVD day and date. They'll make a ton of money.
Of course not. Why do you think nobody goes to the movies any more????????????????????????
Then explain why the 2nd Pirates of the Caribbean has made what 350 mil in what a month?
Or the SW sequel triology with over a bil in US market box office receipts.
Or the LOTR trilogy who did even better than that.
One of my friends is unbelievably liberal. She told me the night before last that she is done with Tom Cruise and anything associated with him. He has cooked his own goose.
I heard a great story about Jeff Daniels. If I recall correctly, several years ago he was in a diner when two teenage girls came in. Somehow, he struck up a conversation with them and found out that they were two girls that couldn't find dates for the prom, so they were going to go together just to go. He went with them to the prom that night as their "date." Now that is a cool guy. I have loved Jeff Daniels ever since.
Apperently it's a big deal to all the idiots who buy these magazines
"People is by far the leader in the weekly celebrity magazine category, with an average circulation of 3.7 million in the last six months of 2005, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations. Wenner Media's Us Weekly has a circulation of 1.7 million, while American Media's Star has 1.4 million."
LATimes story from last week...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1674953/posts
Okay, just for an example. The "Road" pictures with Bob Hope and Bing Crosby made a fortune. Now, who, in this day and age, would be able to: Direct: Produce: Write: Star: in the equivilant? My point is, if you can't make a decent remake of what amounts to "B" cinema from the old days, how the sam hill can anyone build decent movies today?
Let me correct myself. Pirates has made 370 mil in a month domestically and is already at the number 10 spot of all time in 29 days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.