Link to anti-freeper sites more, please. kthx.
Thanks for your post. It's almost as much fun watching the monkey evolutionists fling their crap at the staring onlookers that resemble God.
IMHO, as I under stand it, in the animal kingdom any generic variations are ostracized and are either killed or don't usually get to mate. All of the animal shows I see on TV talk about this. A white wolf has problems. Even in humans we see this. Case in point, what if, and this is a big if, Down Syndrome is just a part of evolution. Abortion or sterilization is the norm for these special people. I don't believe basic animal/human instincts would allow evolution.
Bookmarkie thingy...
I reckon we won't know for sure unless we take a piece of KFC and freeze it for 70 million years. Call your local federal feed trough. They'll be more than happy to fund research on global freezing.
relevant, maybe..
Mississippi being a variation of the Ojibway name "Mishipishu", which means "water panther", or stegosaur
lmao
Well I guess that settles that. Macroevolution is impossible because you say it is. So why did you bother posting the rest of the crap? Shouldn't we be satisfied with your say-so?
But what about the turtle on which the world sits?
Some prominent scientists who were believers: Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo,Descartes, Bacon, Newton, Boyle, Farraday, Mendel, Pasteur, kelvin, Maxwell,Planck, Einstein and Pauli. I appreciated finding this short list in Coulter's recent book.
Usually, people quote Einsteins as denying he believed in a personal God. What he meant by this is unclear but in his personal correspondence that quantum mechanics was not true as his inner voice from the "old one" told him. He also has famously said "God does not throw Dice" in respect to this theory.
Of course there have also been any number of "proofs" of evolution including Piltdown Man (after 40 years proved to be a fraud), Haekel's pictures demonstrating embryology supported evolution (He faked them, but they still are in text books and the photographs debunking them are not), the "Archaeoraptor" supposedly the missing link between birds and dinosaurs also was proved to be a hoax.
My point is many scientists have been people of faith. My other point is a number of other "scientists" have moved heaven and earth as well as hoaxes and frauds to prove the existence of their theories. If their theories were so convincing why did they feel impelled to lie?
If Karl Popper's test is applied--science requires the ability to test and prove the hypothesis wrong--then surely religion as commonly conceived is not scientific and neither is "scientific socialism," psychoanalysis and also evolution. All of these probably have merit and can be conceived as "carving nature at her joints" but there is no way to test them let alone disprove them.
Now, tomzz, you were informed that those pictures of dinosaur meat had the scale removed., to make them look much larger than they actually are. Yet you keep posting the altered versions. I wonder why you think you need to post altered images to make your point?
So, what do evolutionists come up with to answer this one? OK I know the first thing they say is that this and we are stupid. Then they ask if we are scientists and if now how dare we think about such things. Have any entered into the actual point yet?
How many times must you get banned before you get the message, Ted?