Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Syd Barrett dies aged 60
The Guardian, U.K. ^ | 7/11/06 | ByDesign

Posted on 07/11/2006 7:07:40 AM PDT by ByDesign

Syd Barrett dies aged 60

Audrey Gillan Tuesday July 11, 2006 Guardian Unlimited

Syd Barrett, the former lead singer of Pink Floyd and one of the key figures of the 60s, has died at the Cambridgeshire home to which he retreated as a recluse more than 30 years ago. The Guardian has learned that the singer, 60, who suffered from a psychedelic-drug induced breakdown while at the peak of his career, died last Friday from complications related to diabetes.

(Excerpt) Read more at arts.guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: bythewaywhich1spink; pinkfloyd; sydbarret
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Element187
David Gilmour made Pink Floyd what it is today.

Uhh...Roger Waters had quite a bit to do with what made Pink Floyd great.

21 posted on 07/11/2006 7:22:57 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Element187

Careful with that axe, Eugene.........


22 posted on 07/11/2006 7:24:24 AM PDT by Red Badger (Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Element187

Hey,hey...Lucifer Sam is a cool song!


23 posted on 07/11/2006 7:26:26 AM PDT by gr8eman (Everybody is a rocket scientist...until launch day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Element187

The Syd era Floyd never really grabbed me, either, but in the context of the history of the band, and the era it came out, it's very interesting how it set up the rest of their career, and the talent was there, it just was'nt blues based like the Gilmour influence. I agree, David is a genius and should be given most of the credit for their fame in the later years, but he picked up where Syd left off - and they had already made a lot of headway with Syd's contribution.

Like him or hate him, he was one of the big names in music in the 60's, and I just want to mark his passing with a little respect - we have plenty of time to argue his merit, or lack of, later on.


24 posted on 07/11/2006 7:28:35 AM PDT by ByDesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign

Syd Barrett was the walrus.


25 posted on 07/11/2006 7:29:02 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Or more to the point:

Syd Barrett's Acid Trip

"Don't eat that leaf, Syd.

"Don't fall off that cliff, Syd."

"Put your jacket back on, Syd."

"Don't eat those poisonous mushrooms, Syd."

"Let's go home now, Syd."

26 posted on 07/11/2006 7:29:02 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk; Element187
I'd agree with you, but Waters also went over his particular edge. His acidic style is wonderful up until The Wall, where, I think, he goes as far with it as he can. After that, it's like "Roger, how many freakin times can we hear about how miserable you are, and how awful your childhood was?"

Gilmour's musicianship made Floyd more palatable to mainstream audiences. Left to Barrett and Waters, no one would be listening to shrill psychodramas.

27 posted on 07/11/2006 7:29:30 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I think Gilmour and Waters are so different from each other, and yet that's what made it work. They both need each other, whether they like it or not, because neither has done nearly as well on their own.


28 posted on 07/11/2006 7:31:46 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Element187

"horrible horrible incoherent abstract crap"

I agree!


29 posted on 07/11/2006 7:32:31 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign
Oh God. Now Q & Mojo and the other music mags will bang on for months about him. There were plenty of drug casualties from that era and all this claptrap about wasted talent and interruption of his preordained career arc has gotten very tiresome. I have always been suspicious of an otherwise-intrusive press that never seemed to get around to printing pictures of Barrett in his fat/bald/old days.

Full disclosure - have never been a Pink Floyd fan. As a musician I respect what they have achieved, some of their tunes/production techniques, etc. Waters & Gilmour definitely have talent. Except in rare instances I want music to be a positive, uplifting experience (even a 'sad' song) and I never got anything from Floyd except hopelessness, negativity and of course drug references. Being happily drug-free all my life I'm afraid I can't relate.

As for Syd Barrett, he made his choices and was physically/mentally unprepared for the drugs or their aftermath. All around him did their best to coddle this 'genius' but even they had to pack it in when they realized he was a casualty. They do their best to be patient, but these poor guys are asked about Barrett in every single interview! Enough!

'Interstellar Overdrive'? More like 'Earthbound stuck-in-neutral half-arsed noodling in a desperate attempt to conceal a lack of ability on the guitar.'

30 posted on 07/11/2006 7:33:41 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Agreed, but Gilmour's Pink FLoyd has ridden the name to massive (nostalgic) success, while The Final Cut simply sucked.

Gilmour's solo albums are very enjoyable; Waters' are unlistenable. Even back in the 70's Gilmour's self-titled solo album was a terrific listen; "There's No Way Out of Here" is an amazing song about some of the same subject matter Waters goes on and on about, but Gilmour's encapsulates the sense of dread and entrapment in a listenable song. Water's solo stuff tends to hector, lecture and grind along.

31 posted on 07/11/2006 7:34:56 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Element187
You are very right. Syd would have held them back - but for one glorious moment...
32 posted on 07/11/2006 7:36:19 AM PDT by vimto (Blighty Awaken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign

We became acquainted with PF during the Ummagumma / Atom Heart / Meddle stage, and Syd was already gone by then. But his influence was definitely there.

When we went to the Dark Side Of The Moon concert, it was "What's this?! PF doing rock 'n roll??" IIRC they did the entire album, start to finish.

A unique PF innovation: this was an outdoor concert, and there were huge speaker banks L/R at the stage, L/R at about mid-audience, and one at the very back of the audience. PF had a great deal of fun "spinning" the music around those speaker banks in different directions and at different speeds, something like a Dolby 5.1 trick but this was in 1973 (??).

Unfortunately it made a certain out-of-control segment of the audience even more out-of-control. It was just too much for them.


33 posted on 07/11/2006 7:40:25 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign

Home, home again
I like to be there when I can...


34 posted on 07/11/2006 7:40:48 AM PDT by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign

Home, home again
I like to be there when I can...


35 posted on 07/11/2006 7:41:01 AM PDT by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ByDesign

R.I.P. Syd Barrett


36 posted on 07/11/2006 7:41:52 AM PDT by lunarbicep (Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Gilmour's musicianship made Floyd more palatable to mainstream audiences.

This is where I think it went downhill. Starting with the Final Cut and then with A Momentary Lapse of reason.

One of my absolute favorite albums...


37 posted on 07/11/2006 7:45:56 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Wish You Were Here
38 posted on 07/11/2006 7:48:04 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't love Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
When Gilmour came along, it all gelled. Waters was salt, Gilmour was honey, you could say (OK, best I could think up on no sleep). They fought, literally and fuiguratively, each other's dominance.

When Waters took off, his solo albums showed that he's one of those musicians who needs someone to reign him in, a partner or producer.

Gilmour's Floyd showed how easy it is to fake "dark" lyrics--the lyrics stink--but even though Floyd's songwriting wasn't as strong, it still SOUNDED like Floyd. But the magic combination was gone, so it's been just a fake Floyd since The Wall (I hated The Final Cut--all gloom).

39 posted on 07/11/2006 7:57:07 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

"fake Floyd since The Wall"

I despise that album. It isn't Pink Floyd.


40 posted on 07/11/2006 8:01:19 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson