Skip to comments.
KU Professor's Research Defies Traditional Thinking About Agriculture in Amazonia
Kansas City infoZine ^
| Sunday, June 04, 2006
| infoZine Staff
Posted on 06/05/2006 8:21:18 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
Research by a University of Kansas professor and his colleagues showing that ancient Amazonia may have supported large-scale agriculture is challenging conventional thinking and providing ideas for more efficient and environmentally friendly land use in the future... He thinks inhabitants enriched the soil by adding household waste and using a method called slash and char. Slash and char differs from the more established practice of slash and burn. Slash and burn was a high temperature fire that emitted a lot of gas and didn't add much to the soil. Slash and char was a much lower-temperature, smoldering method that added more carbon and organic material to the soil. Practitioners likely burned vegetation while it was still green, resulting in a slow burning fire, then added more wet, green vegetation to keep it that way. The result would have been soil rich with carbon that could last up to 50,000 years, Woods said. It also challenges the established belief that inhabitants of Amazonia were mostly nomadic.
(Excerpt) Read more at infozine.com ...
TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs
The main obstacle has been Clovis-first-and-Only, which requires that the Americas were settled just once, fairly recently, and from north to south.
1
posted on
06/05/2006 8:21:22 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; ...
2
posted on
06/05/2006 8:21:41 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
I read about this in the book 1491, recently. I forget who wrote it, but it was quite an interesting read, if a little bit PC.
3
posted on
06/05/2006 1:30:02 PM PDT
by
chesley
(Republicans don't deserve to win, but America does not deserve the Dhimmicrats.)
To: chesley
4
posted on
06/05/2006 3:16:08 PM PDT
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
5
posted on
06/05/2006 3:19:56 PM PDT
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv
Slash and burn was a high temperature fire that emitted a lot of gas and didn't add much to the soil. Slash and char was a much lower-temperature, smoldering method that added more carbon and organic material to the soil. Practitioners likely burned vegetation while it was still green, resulting in a slow burning fire, then added more wet, green vegetation to keep it that way. Guess they found a book on how and why to burn and char. /sarc
6
posted on
06/05/2006 6:24:17 PM PDT
by
Dustbunny
(Amazing Grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson