Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conspiracy lovers see two false starts (BARBARO INJURED BEFORE PREAKNESS ???)
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | May 26, 2006 | JIM O'DONNELL STAFF REPORTER

Posted on 05/26/2006 8:17:39 AM PDT by Chi-townChief

If the doors of perception were ever cleansed, the major event attendant to the 2006 Preakness might make a little more sense.

Of course, if thoroughbred racing's doors of perception were ever thoroughly cleansed, the parimutuel part of the game probably would no longer exist. Only the gentried shooing flies and imbecilic bottom clockers would remain.

Instead, an industry constantly trying to tether itself to the major American sports leaderboard once again finds itself in the midst of another plow-out after the near- fatal racing injuries suffered by Kentucky Derby champion Barbaro last Saturday at Pimlico Race Course.

On Thursday, the colt was reported to be continuing his recovery on the uptick at the University of Pennsylvania's New Bolton Center in Kennett Square, Pa. According to chief veterinary surgeon Dean Richardson, "Barbaro is progressing nicely, has totally normal vital signs and is in excellent condition.''

Said Corinne Sweeney, executive director of the Widener Hospital at the New Bolton Center: "It was another boring day, which is all we want for him right now. Boring day upon boring day while his recovery moves forward.''

But like love and carriage, horse and marriage, racetracks and conspiracy theories are a match made in a dramatist's heaven. It was not by mere coincidence that Oliver Stone chose ominously opaque ovals as the backdrops for critical scenes in both "JFK'' and "Nixon.'' As breeding grounds for suspicion and rich-men-gone-Machiavellian, racetracks historically are Z-number-one, top of the heap.

The central pegs for conspiracy theorists studying video replay of NBC's coverage of the final moments leading to the Preakness and Barbaro's dart with death are reasonably compelling: Why didn't attending veterinarians employed by the Maryland Racing Commission make a more thorough examination of the star colt after he prematurely broke through the starting gate? And why didn't they err on the side of caution and scratch the horse?

Missing footage, fast inspection

The total elapsed time from the instant Barbaro breaks through the gate (at 1:15:42 of the NBC telecast) until he is jogged back, ostensibly examined and the race begins (at 1:17:01) is 1 minute, 19 seconds. A key live portion of that span -- when David G. Zipf, chief veterinarian for the Maryland Racing Commission, insists he examined the colt thoroughly enough to predict a safe run -- is not available on the NBC tape because the network opted to replay Barbaro breaking through the gate.

Instead, only live observers closest to the Pimlico starting gate saw what actually happened. And Zipf has told multiple reporters that all was as normal as could be under the extraordinary circumstance, noting: "I went through the stall he was in and followed him back around. Once he was gathered up [by an outrider] and turned around, the first thing I looked for was head trauma or abrasions or cuts. I then walked behind him as he trotted back to make sure, leg-wise, that there was no problem.

"I could see nothing that would insult his performance. [I] saw no problems with his head or legs. I'm certain there was nothing that would predispose to the injury that occurred in the race.

"We want people to know the circumstances so we can eliminate speculation that isn't warranted. I don't want there to be any gray areas about what we do.''

Had there been any sign of blood anywhere on Barbaro, according to thoroughbred-racing experts in Maryland and Illinois, the colt would have been scratched. Whether there was developing bruising to a front leg that might have contributed to the disaster has not been commented on by any of the principals in the saga.

But in the minutes when an injured Barbaro was being returned to the stakes barn on the Pimlico backstretch, retired Hall of Fame jockey/Preakness analyst Gary Stevens told the NBC audience: "One thing that happens so often -- if there is a front-leg injury -- perhaps he was trying to get off something on the front end and put too much stress on the back end to cause this problem. But that's all speculation.''

The amount of pressure it took Barbaro to break the starting gate also has been overstated in some quarters. Industry experts say a mere 30 pounds of force is enough to pop the barrier.

Equally speculative is the weighing of factors that could have induced Zipf to order a scratch during the brief interval between Barbaro's false start and the opening bell. While such a decision would have come across as positively Churchillian in its depth of instantaneous courage and nobility, the move also would have arbitrarily ended the annual pursuit of a Triple Crown -- the Holy springtime Grail of racetrack marketing.

A veterinarian's scratch also would have forced the refund of millions of dollars wagered on Barbaro and added to the growing image of Pimlico as a haunted and scary thoroughbred venue.

A little help for the horse

What can't be overstated is the amount of sheer luck that played into the rapid stabilization of Barbaro and his quick transport to the New Bolton Center. The colt caught an enormous break when no skin was broken despite his triple fracture. Had there been any ripped outer tissue, his chances of survival would have dropped to 10 percent, according to equine medical authorities.

Also, with the Baltimore police clearing an exit path in the congested neighborhood around Pimlico, Barbaro made the 73-mile trip to the Widener Hospital in less than 90 minutes. The trip was a reverse of the same one Barbaro had made the previous morning from the Fair Hill Training Center in nearby Elkton, Md., to Pimlico, so some have suggested the specter of a return home might have helped calm the damaged horse.

The hospital is also the only one in the mid-Atlantic region with a water pool for post-op recovery, Richardson said. That greatly assisted Barbaro in the hours after his six-hour surgery Sunday. And a huge positive, Sweeney said, has been the colt's intelligence and comprehension of events.

"Some horses fight treatment, often with fatal consequences,'' she said. "Others, like Barbaro, understand that you are trying to help them.''

''All we want,'' said Gretchen Jackson, who co-owns Barbaro with husband Roy and sits on the 24-member board that oversees the New Bolton Center, "is for him to lead a pain-free life.''

Perhaps out of the darkness, thoroughbred racing's doors of perception will be cleansed.

jodonnell@suntimes.com


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: barbaro; conspiracy; horseracing; preakness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Where's a horsey Oliver Stone when you need him?

This surprised me after what I heard during the broadcast:

The amount of pressure it took Barbaro to break the starting gate also has been overstated in some quarters. Industry experts say a mere 30 pounds of force is enough to pop the barrier.
1 posted on 05/26/2006 8:17:42 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Barbaro was definitely injured before the start of the race. I can't believe the number of people who have not gone back and watched the NBC broadcast tape which shows this. The tape after he broke through the gate clearly shows him trotting on three legs and holding the right rear leg up and he hops along...BEFORE the race.


2 posted on 05/26/2006 8:23:24 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

You mean a plane didn't really fly into the horse's leg during the race?


3 posted on 05/26/2006 8:24:35 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

LOL. Actually, it was a Predator drone...


4 posted on 05/26/2006 8:27:30 AM PDT by eureka! (Heaven forbid the Rats get control of Congress and/or the Presidency any time soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

Anyone see Jeff Gilooly in the area?

5 posted on 05/26/2006 8:28:08 AM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

I don't know much about horses, but I do know human nature. Barbaro wasn't going to be scratched from the race unless one of his legs actually fell off.


6 posted on 05/26/2006 8:28:44 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

*ping*


7 posted on 05/26/2006 8:29:01 AM PDT by Beaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

I get nervous when I see a grassy knoll.


8 posted on 05/26/2006 8:38:44 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
May I ask a somewhat related question, in the hope that anyone with a knowledge of horse-racing can respond:

I read that even if Barbaro survives, he's very unlikely to be a successful stud because his rear legs won't be able to support his weight when he mounts the mare. Jockey Club rules require that only natural insemination is used for thoroughbreeds bred to race.

Anyone know why that is? I don't see why they wouldn't allow artificial insemination. DNA tracing can protect against fraud. What could be the reason?

9 posted on 05/26/2006 8:41:20 AM PDT by ken5050 (GWB, Reagan, Thatcher, Pope John Paul II, freed hundreds of millions.# of Nobel PeacePrizes: ZERO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
...Of course, if thoroughbred racing's doors of perception were ever thoroughly cleansed, the parimutuel part of the game probably would no longer exist. Only the gentried shooing flies and imbecilic bottom clockers would remain. ...

Huh? Can this be translated into English?

10 posted on 05/26/2006 8:45:06 AM PDT by FReepaholic ("I just freaked out and shot him -- boom, boom, boom, boom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief; ecurbh; CindyDawg; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; Duchess47; FrogInABlender; ...
Every time I take my horse on trail, I am constantly guessing and second guessing and worrying and debating my judgment on whether he is sound. Now, he's an aging 24 year old pleasure horse, but I don't think the minds of anyone running a young thoroughbred are any less settled and sure. That's what 'nerves' and 'jitters' are.

The truth is, every instinct a horse has tells him to hide any sign of weakness or injury, and the human beings in this case had next to no ability to be omniscient about anything that might have been wrong. We'd like to be, but we aren't.

One aspect I haven't seen discussed, besides the human desire to see that Barbaro ran this race even after the false start, is that the OTHER horses and jockeys already in the gate are a risk of serious injury that only increases the longer they have to stand in the gate. Strong horses in small spaces, expecting to hear a bell the thunder of the start at any moment are dangerous, and there is a very real need to get the race started ASAP once the first horse is loaded. They couldn't take all day to make this decision, and instincts told them to check mostly for sign of injuries to the front end that would have had contact with the gate.

Only with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight and all the time in the world to think about it, can we analyze these judgments now. That's my take on it.

Ping!


11 posted on 05/26/2006 8:45:24 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Anyone know why that is? I don't see why they wouldn't allow artificial insemination. DNA tracing can protect against fraud. What could be the reason?

The arguments against AI are prevention of fraud, prevention of unintended defects in the ability breed naturally, and the importance to diversity in the gene pool of limiting any one horse's impact to that which he can do naturally.

Some breeds to allow it, but I'm not sure they are smarter.

12 posted on 05/26/2006 8:48:35 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief
...A key live portion of that span -- ...is not available on the NBC tape because the network opted to replay Barbaro breaking through the gate....

I'm betting that NBC did have a camera on him during this and that they were running tape on it as they normally would.

13 posted on 05/26/2006 8:48:57 AM PDT by FReepaholic ("I just freaked out and shot him -- boom, boom, boom, boom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy
he tape after he broke through the gate clearly shows him trotting on three legs and holding the right rear leg up and he hops along...BEFORE the race.

If it was so clear, don't you think others would have seen that? I didn't.

14 posted on 05/26/2006 8:49:32 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

Dont ask, dont tell.

;-)


15 posted on 05/26/2006 8:50:37 AM PDT by Canedawg (In God We Trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

The video that shows him hopping was one from a replay of the gate-breaking incident which was shown 5-10 minutes after the race on NBC.


16 posted on 05/26/2006 8:54:54 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I'm not a vet but I watched the horse going back to the gate and I saw no signs of lameness, much less the horse being three legged lame. I think the consipiracists (if there is such a word), just love to eat this stuff up.


17 posted on 05/26/2006 8:56:17 AM PDT by cjshapi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

Not even the announcers noticed it, but if you are watching the leg, you can't miss it.


18 posted on 05/26/2006 8:57:56 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ZGuy

If you have access to a link, post it. Otherwise, I'll say it's preposterous to say you "can't miss it" on a peice of tape that's been watched and rewatched by lots of learned people since last weekend. None of them have reported this.


19 posted on 05/26/2006 9:02:35 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=2000620

NEW YORK May 24, 2006 (AP)— Preakness winner Bernardini will not run in the Belmont Stakes, another blow to the final race of the Triple Crown series.

Dubai's Sheik Mohammed, who operates Darley Stud, made the decision to rest Bernardini.


20 posted on 05/26/2006 9:03:50 AM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson