Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GMMAC
take your disingenuous & strident girlie-man whining to DU.

Sorry, I do not go away that easily. And instead of only banging out my position on the keyboard, I am actually getting a local ordinance through to ban pitbulls and other breeds known or thought to be vicious.

214 posted on 05/29/2006 4:57:59 PM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]


To: BJungNan; Candor7; Fair Go; feinswinesuksass; solosmoke; proud_yank; fanfan; kanawa
If you happen to live within a local jurisdiction with lots of other knee-jerk nanny-staters like yourself, this may not be too hard.

Getting one initially passed is light years easier than keeping one on the books.
Ask your fellow statists in Toledo Ohio:
Seems their State Supreme Court couldn't reconcile Toledo's with a State Constitution which enshrines individual liberties.

With all the other problems in the world today, one really has to wonder about the motivations of anyone who'd make such a minuscule percentage of dogs - or, more accurately 'irresponsible dog-owners' - such a high personal priority?

Unless, of course, they'd been instructed to promote as much acrimony & disruption both here & elsewhere as possible?

BTW, arguing black to white won't change reality.
Anyone who reading this thread knows full well you've never answered any of the issues raised with respect to the personal liberties of the 99+% of dog-owners who've done nothing whatsoever to warrant your personal unreasoned campaign against their pets.
217 posted on 05/29/2006 5:55:06 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

To: BJungNan; GMMAC; kanawa; Candor7; girlangler
Sorry, I do not go away that easily. And instead of only banging out my position on the keyboard, I am actually getting a local ordinance through to ban pitbulls and other breeds known or thought to be vicious.

Hey COOL! Way to go champ!! Way to FORCE your views on the rest of us!

Thanks to folks such as yourself, I can look forward to owning a beautiful toy-poodle someday. Assuming of course, you draw the line somewhere before then.

When you're done with that you can start pushing for a ban on guns, SUV's, and pickups in the name of 'public safety'.

I'd start off with guns first, personally, since people don't 'need' them and they kill. Start with .50-cal rifles, then work your way to 'assault rifles' (even that in the US that is a BS term). People will start to get complacent as your statist cause progresses. Once that is completed, start in on handguns.

When you get to the cars that people don't 'need', remember to mention Global Warming™ REPEATEDLY, in addition to screaming about how an SUV hitting a Smart Car can potentially KILL everyone in it. This might be tricky, many libs seem to like their SUV's too.

For help with your dog campaign, I'd contact PeTA first. They'd embrace your ideology! (Also, if you get arrested for something illegal, they might even post bail!)

For guns, Rebecca Peters & the UN would be great help. Through the UN, you'll also get the help of various totalitarian regimes who have handled these kinds of situations before.

For cars, Al Gore is certainly an ally. He even has a new movie out that he might graciously let you distribute for a nominal fee.

All the best!
-Proud Yank
218 posted on 05/29/2006 6:23:02 PM PDT by proud_yank (A liberal's 'generosity' is limited to the funds available in someone else's account.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson