To: BJungNan; Candor7; Fair Go; feinswinesuksass; solosmoke; proud_yank; fanfan; kanawa
If you happen to live within a local jurisdiction with lots of other knee-jerk nanny-staters like yourself, this may not be too hard.
Getting one initially passed is light years easier than keeping one on the books.
Ask your fellow statists in Toledo Ohio:
Seems their State Supreme Court couldn't reconcile Toledo's with a State Constitution which enshrines individual liberties.
With all the other problems in the world today, one really has to wonder about the motivations of anyone who'd make such a minuscule percentage of dogs - or, more accurately 'irresponsible dog-owners' - such a high personal priority?
Unless, of course, they'd been instructed to promote as much acrimony & disruption both here & elsewhere as possible?
BTW, arguing black to white won't change reality.
Anyone who reading this thread knows full well you've never answered any of the issues raised with respect to the personal liberties of the 99+% of dog-owners who've done nothing whatsoever to warrant your personal unreasoned campaign against their pets.
217 posted on
05/29/2006 5:55:06 PM PDT by
GMMAC
(Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
To: GMMAC
Anyone who reading this thread knows full well you've never answered any of the issues raised with respect to the personal liberties of the 99+% of dog-owners who've done nothing whatsoever to warrant your personal unreasoned campaign against their pets. YOu can mistate my position all you want if it makes it easier for you. The facts are I am not advocating banning the "perosnal liberties of the 99+% of dog-owners..." I am advocating restrictions on the ownership of certain breeds of dogs with a history of vicious attackes, specifically pitbulls. Let's keep that point straight.
Second, it is not an unreasoned campaign to petition our local government for a ban on pitbulls. The reason is the dogs are a threat, make people feel uncomfortable and there is sufficient evidence that this breed of dog is not suitable for a residential neighborhood.
Your freedoms are not so all encompassing as you imagine them to be. We are a country of laws, many of which restrict your personal freedoms.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson