Posted on 05/12/2006 2:12:02 PM PDT by wagglebee
"Da Vinci Code director Ron Howard has said there would be no disclaimer in the film labeling it as a work of fiction and Catholic League President Bill Donohue is deeply disturbed by Howards stance.
"The book which the film is based on begins with three facts, all of which are malicious lies, yet Ron Howard says no disclaimer is needed because this is a work of fiction, Donahue said in a statement. "He is disingenuous.
As Donahue points out, the following got a disclaimer in a fictionalized TV show or film:
Asians: "Year of the Dragon
Blacks: "Birth of a Nation
Gays: "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back
Jews: "Merchant of Venice
Mormons: "Big Love
Muslims: "True Lies
Native Americans: "Pocahontas II
Nearsighted: "Mr. Magoo
Wolves: "White Fang
Donahue declares: "Thats right even wolves merited a disclaimer. Disney put a disclaimer in White Fang saying there is no evidence of a healthy pack of wolves attacking a human in North America.
"Forget about wolves. If Howard were as sensitive to Catholics as those responsible for La Vita E Bella were to Jews, he would have acceded to our request to inject a disclaimer. That 1998 film a dark comedy about the Holocaust opened with a voice-over saying it is a fable. So is The Da Vinci Code.
In an interview with the Los Angeles Times on Sunday, Howard rejected calls for a disclaimer, stating: "This is a work of fiction that presents a set of characters that are affected by these conspiracy theories and ideas. Those characters in this work of fiction act and react on that premise.
"Its not history. To start with a disclaimer spy thrillers dont start off with disclaimers.
However, in the book the movie is based on, author Dan Brown claims on the first page that "all descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate, indicating the book is based on historical fact.
Donahue said in his statement: "John Calley, a co-producer of The Da Vinci Code, has admitted that the film is anti-Catholic.
"Apparently, Ron Howard is more of a gambler than I thought. Had he done what other directors have done before him and put in a disclaimer, the risks to his reputation would have been minimal. Now its show time for Mr. Howard, and not just his movie.
I don't think it is so much offended, it's more like the movie is intentionally leading gulliable people astray. It tries to pass itself off as plausible truth for the purpose of discrediting the Gospel.
"Piss Christ" and "South Park" may offend; that's their problem and anyone can't take a joke. Water, meet duck's back.
This MISLEADS the unwary and the gullible, which is a more serious issue:
Luke 17:2 "It would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around his neck than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin."
I agree wholeheartedly with your description, but not your conclusion. Just because I'm offended by a lousy novel that doesn't mean that my faith is threatened.
If you remember this same thing happened to the once popular book "The Celestine Prophecy". Everyone thought it was real and true yet it was on the fiction shelves and on page two or three was the words "fiction". Hell, I know people that thought that "The Bridges of Madison County" was a true story.
Very well said -
Oh Magoo, you've done it again!
Truly, I hadn't considered it from that angle. Thanks for the insightful response.
You are very welcome!
If Donahue's list is correct, I too find it pathetic. Disclaimer = political correctness.
You know there's too much Catholic bashing when all of us Protestants come out and say "Whoa, could you tone it down a bit?" :)
And He went further than that (our reason for gladness): "Blessed are you when men hate you, when they exclude you and insult you and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man. Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven. For that is how their fathers treated the prophets." Luke 6:22-23
The Catholic church got its knickers in a twist over DOGMA as well ... they take things too seriously .... four hundred years ago they'd burn this author ... I read The Code and thought it entertaining, nothing more.
"Come on; it's fiction, it's fiction, it's fiction..."
Hypocritical. They only plead innocence for attacks on facts they don't care about. If it were a fictitious perversion of their favorite President, or their favorite country, or their favorite blog site, or their favorite race, or their favorite religion, or their favorite lifestyle, or their favorite organization, or their favorite scientific theory, etc.,
STAND WAY BACK OR YOU'LL GET BURNT!
Let's have a show of hands of anyone so dense they actually need a "this is fiction" tag on a movie made from a fictional novel.
> Was there a disclaimer before "Independence Day"
It's going to be that bad, eh?
That was not a very nice thing to say.
He also did the "Alamo" which was pure "PC" crap.
I'm sure Davey Crockett and John Wayne were spinning in their respective graves over that one.
"I'm ashame'd of ya', Ope."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.