Skip to comments.
Ron Howard: No 'Da Vinci Code' Disclaimer
NewsMax ^
| 5/12/06
| NewsMax
Posted on 05/12/2006 2:12:02 PM PDT by wagglebee
"Da Vinci Code director Ron Howard has said there would be no disclaimer in the film labeling it as a work of fiction and Catholic League President Bill Donohue is deeply disturbed by Howards stance.
"The book which the film is based on begins with three facts, all of which are malicious lies, yet Ron Howard says no disclaimer is needed because this is a work of fiction, Donahue said in a statement. "He is disingenuous.
As Donahue points out, the following got a disclaimer in a fictionalized TV show or film:
Asians: "Year of the Dragon
Blacks: "Birth of a Nation
Gays: "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back
Jews: "Merchant of Venice
Mormons: "Big Love
Muslims: "True Lies
Native Americans: "Pocahontas II
Nearsighted: "Mr. Magoo
Wolves: "White Fang
Donahue declares: "Thats right even wolves merited a disclaimer. Disney put a disclaimer in White Fang saying there is no evidence of a healthy pack of wolves attacking a human in North America.
"Forget about wolves. If Howard were as sensitive to Catholics as those responsible for La Vita E Bella were to Jews, he would have acceded to our request to inject a disclaimer. That 1998 film a dark comedy about the Holocaust opened with a voice-over saying it is a fable. So is The Da Vinci Code.
In an interview with the Los Angeles Times on Sunday, Howard rejected calls for a disclaimer, stating: "This is a work of fiction that presents a set of characters that are affected by these conspiracy theories and ideas. Those characters in this work of fiction act and react on that premise.
"Its not history. To start with a disclaimer
spy thrillers dont start off with disclaimers.
However, in the book the movie is based on, author Dan Brown claims on the first page that "all descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate, indicating the book is based on historical fact.
Donahue said in his statement: "John Calley, a co-producer of The Da Vinci Code, has admitted that the film is anti-Catholic.
"Apparently, Ron Howard is more of a gambler than I thought. Had he done what other directors have done before him and put in a disclaimer, the risks to his reputation would have been minimal. Now its show time for Mr. Howard, and not just his movie.
TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: billdonohue; catholic; catholicleague; christianity; davincicode; hollywood; itsfiction; ronhoward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-170 next last
Donahue said in his statement: "John Calley, a co-producer of The Da Vinci Code, has admitted that the film is anti-Catholic. Ron Howard used to be one of the directors that I respected, but no more.
1
posted on
05/12/2006 2:12:04 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: NYer; Coleus; narses
2
posted on
05/12/2006 2:12:39 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
They actually did a disclaimer for the 'The Merchant of Venice'? How pathetic.
3
posted on
05/12/2006 2:14:13 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: wagglebee
Christians are not a protected class.
4
posted on
05/12/2006 2:15:27 PM PDT
by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: wagglebee
I was channel surfing and came upon an E! True Hollywood Story about the show "Happy Days" and they had a clip from where the cast was going to a softball game and Ron Howard opined about the only solution is a "one world government".
He grew up in Hollywood and probably raised in the anti Judeo-Christian leanings of Hollywood.
6
posted on
05/12/2006 2:16:00 PM PDT
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: wagglebee
7
posted on
05/12/2006 2:16:58 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: wagglebee
Let's see a show of hands for all who are surprised....
8
posted on
05/12/2006 2:17:43 PM PDT
by
Jaded
(does it really need a sarcasm tag?)
To: Dane
His father was/is quite old fashioned.
9
posted on
05/12/2006 2:17:53 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: wagglebee
I have no problem with his stance.
The book is fiction,the movie is fiction .
A disclaimer is not needed.
10
posted on
05/12/2006 2:18:04 PM PDT
by
Mears
To: kinoxi
Dan Brown claims on the first page that "all descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate, indicating the book is based on historical fact.Most the people I have talked to who have read it, think that only the characters are fictional.
To: wagglebee
Ron Howard: "Hey Fonz, F-you you stinking papist! Go worship the pedophile whore of babylon!"
12
posted on
05/12/2006 2:18:29 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
To: kinoxi
it's fiction
Oh, really? Thanks, I would never have known considering how many people are walking around out there claiming it's fact---including the author.
13
posted on
05/12/2006 2:19:33 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
To: wagglebee
fiction is fiction, anyone who does not understand this will not be helped by a disclaimer.
half the country believes in ufo's and ghosts.
14
posted on
05/12/2006 2:19:41 PM PDT
by
mmercier
(nothing is new under the sun)
To: wagglebee
Also on the subject of the Ron Howard and "The Andy Griffith Show".
The lady who played Aunt Bea's best friend, Clara Edwards, appeared in Rosemary's Baby, shouting, "hail satan".
15
posted on
05/12/2006 2:20:27 PM PDT
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: wagglebee
Damn!
Now I wish Opie HAD gotten his ass kicked in episode #37 on the old Andy Griffith Show.
16
posted on
05/12/2006 2:20:28 PM PDT
by
EyeGuy
To: Killer Kane
Society will be better off when producers of fiction start bending over and kissing the asses of religious "authority."
Let's see---they kiss everyone elses @ss. See the list above.
Being an anti-Catholic bigot is the last acceptable prejudice among the elite. Personally, I'm glad of it. Christ himself told us that the world would hate us.
17
posted on
05/12/2006 2:21:42 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
To: wagglebee
18
posted on
05/12/2006 2:21:58 PM PDT
by
johnny7
(“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
To: wagglebee
Ron Howard is,and always will be,Opie.I've never been,and never will be,interested in anything he's done since then.
To: nickcarraway
dan brown wants to make money, controversy is a cash cow to him. if all of the characters are fictitious, doesn't that make it a piece of fiction?
20
posted on
05/12/2006 2:22:47 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-170 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson