To: wagglebee
I have no problem with his stance.
The book is fiction,the movie is fiction .
A disclaimer is not needed.
10 posted on
05/12/2006 2:18:04 PM PDT by
Mears
To: Mears
The book is fiction,the movie is fiction . It is and it is? Who knew? Thanks for the tip!
49 posted on
05/12/2006 2:39:00 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Mears
Remember that when you start having DUmmies tell you it's real. How may of those retards told us we needed to stop global warming because of what they saw in The Day After Tomorrow? For the soft minds that vote Dhimmocrat and think that socialism is "economic justice" this movie will incite them against Christianity even more than they already were. And then those very same people will bitch and moan if their precious islamofascists are presented in anything other than a favorable light.
103 posted on
05/12/2006 3:54:05 PM PDT by
PeterFinn
(Anita Bryant was right!)
To: Mears
I have no problem with his stance. The book is fiction, the movie is fiction . A disclaimer is not needed. Agreed. Howard is not out of line.
'Better watch his back, though.
130 posted on
05/12/2006 6:24:33 PM PDT by
b9
("the [evil Marxist liberal socialist Democrat Party] alternative is unthinkable" ~ Jim Robinson)
To: Mears
I think a disclaimer at the end is harmless and would probably have won him ticket sales.
This will be a hit.
This will make money.
However Howard has officially made his movie a hit piece on christianity. Too bad.
170 posted on
05/15/2006 8:11:24 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson