Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Howard: No 'Da Vinci Code' Disclaimer
NewsMax ^ | 5/12/06 | NewsMax

Posted on 05/12/2006 2:12:02 PM PDT by wagglebee

"Da Vinci Code” director Ron Howard has said there would be no disclaimer in the film labeling it as a work of fiction – and Catholic League President Bill Donohue is deeply disturbed by Howard’s stance.

"The book which the film is based on begins with three ‘facts,’ all of which are malicious lies, yet Ron Howard says no disclaimer is needed because ‘this is a work of fiction,’” Donahue said in a statement. "He is disingenuous.”

As Donahue points out, the following got a disclaimer in a fictionalized TV show or film:

Asians: "Year of the Dragon”

Blacks: "Birth of a Nation”

Gays: "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back”

Jews: "Merchant of Venice”

Mormons: "Big Love”

Muslims: "True Lies”

Native Americans: "Pocahontas II”

Nearsighted: "Mr. Magoo”

Wolves: "White Fang”

Donahue declares: "That’s right — even wolves merited a disclaimer. Disney put a disclaimer in ‘White Fang’ saying there is no evidence of a healthy pack of wolves attacking a human in North America.

"Forget about wolves. If Howard were as sensitive to Catholics as those responsible for ‘La Vita E Bella’ were to Jews, he would have acceded to our request to inject a disclaimer. That 1998 film — a dark comedy about the Holocaust — opened with a voice-over saying it is a fable. So is ‘The Da Vinci Code.’”

In an interview with the Los Angeles Times on Sunday, Howard rejected calls for a disclaimer, stating: "This is a work of fiction that presents a set of characters that are affected by these conspiracy theories and ideas. Those characters in this work of fiction act and react on that premise.

"It’s not history. To start with a disclaimer … spy thrillers don’t start off with disclaimers.”

However, in the book the movie is based on, author Dan Brown claims on the first page that "all descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents and secret rituals in this novel are accurate,” indicating the book is based on historical fact.

Donahue said in his statement: "John Calley, a co-producer of ‘The Da Vinci Code,’ has admitted that the film is anti-Catholic.

"Apparently, Ron Howard is more of a gambler than I thought. Had he done what other directors have done before him and put in a disclaimer, the risks to his reputation would have been minimal. Now it’s show time for Mr. Howard, and not just his movie.”


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: billdonohue; catholic; catholicleague; christianity; davincicode; hollywood; itsfiction; ronhoward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-170 next last
To: CWW

"...how about I write a book about your mother and portray her as a lying crack-whore?"

LOL! That about sums it up.
LOL...


101 posted on 05/12/2006 3:45:06 PM PDT by E-Mat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

They should have had a disclaimer for all straight people for Brokeback Mountain


102 posted on 05/12/2006 3:51:32 PM PDT by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Remember that when you start having DUmmies tell you it's real. How may of those retards told us we needed to stop global warming because of what they saw in The Day After Tomorrow? For the soft minds that vote Dhimmocrat and think that socialism is "economic justice" this movie will incite them against Christianity even more than they already were. And then those very same people will bitch and moan if their precious islamofascists are presented in anything other than a favorable light.
103 posted on 05/12/2006 3:54:05 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Anita Bryant was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CWW

GO GET 'EM!!!!!


104 posted on 05/12/2006 3:55:23 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Anita Bryant was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

You're so much more brilliant than everyone else. Can I touch you?


105 posted on 05/12/2006 3:56:25 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I don't believe in disclaimers for people who are too easily offended. I still like "Apollo 13" and I liked "A Beautiful Mind." BTW, Ron Howard is the executive producer of 24. I won't be seeing this movie, but that won't stop me from enjoying his other work, any more than "Munich" stopped me from liking "Band of Brothers."

BTW, Rosemary's Baby was and is a great satire of what we would today call yuppies.

106 posted on 05/12/2006 3:58:05 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant

"You're so much more brilliant than everyone else. Can I touch you?"

LOL!!!

I'm just a master of the obvious is all.


107 posted on 05/12/2006 4:00:29 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Anita Bryant was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Finny
I am disturbed that so many Americans put so much truck in the historical "accuracy" of Da Vinci Code, a book which I read and found profoundly overrated. However, fiction CAN be very truthful and illuminating, such as Michael Crichton's "State of Fear," a must-read for all high school students and FReepers.

Ironically I also find it disturbing that many people put so much truck in the scientific "accuracy" of State of Fear.

108 posted on 05/12/2006 4:13:39 PM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
and the movie Mars Attacks didn't come with a disclaimer either... seriously guys, just get laid.
109 posted on 05/12/2006 4:15:35 PM PDT by Energy Alley ("War on Christians" = just another professional victim group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

You'd be surprised.


110 posted on 05/12/2006 4:22:49 PM PDT by Jaded (does it really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Of course not because so many people do believe it is true, and many more want others to think so. We are not all stupid out here Ron!!!


111 posted on 05/12/2006 4:24:47 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

But no one has the right to drag Christian beliefs in the mud either. This book is trash and should be called what it is a fantasy. There are so many people ignorant of Who Jesus is. This film will just add to their ignorance as they believe they are really seeing truth. How sad.


112 posted on 05/12/2006 4:27:35 PM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spatso

You'd be surprised by how many Protestants think it's the truth.


113 posted on 05/12/2006 4:29:11 PM PDT by Jaded (does it really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

"Henry Winkler is Jewish."

No way the Fonz is Jewish. He's as Italian as that guy with the funny hat in those Marx Brothers movies.


114 posted on 05/12/2006 4:29:22 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
BTW, Rosemary's Baby was and is a great satire of what we would today call yuppies

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see that movie as a satire, but more of a reflection and celebration of 60's "values"(I know an oxymoronic term).

115 posted on 05/12/2006 4:33:25 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: joylyn

My notional thought of faith fragility was directed more towards the idea of a maturity in faith rather than a depth of belief. I did not mean to imply that people would lose their faith as result of reading the book. In terms of being offended, it is pretty mild stuff.


116 posted on 05/12/2006 4:35:34 PM PDT by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Ron Howard: "Hey Fonz, F-you you stinking papist! Go worship the pedophile whore of babylon!""

Henry Winkler is Jewish.

I think you missed the point. The character Fonzarelli is obviously supposed to be an Italian-American, thus probably a Catholic. The statement is aimed at the Fonz, not at Henry Winkler.


117 posted on 05/12/2006 4:38:53 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

So Opie grew up to be a bad boy huh? Little Richie is a sh*t disturbing liberal? Sad...So sad...


118 posted on 05/12/2006 4:40:18 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Somebody important make The Call.....pitchforks and lanterns.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: conservative blonde
It depends on which Jesus you are talking about. I love the Jesus of Mark who goes to the cross, beaten, betrayed and scorned. Mark portrays a profoundly human Jesus that suffers the wound of a broken humanity. I am not nearly as enthusiastic for John's account. John's Jesus is shaped by a higher Christology. I am not able to connect with John in the same way as I can with the synoptic gospels. Dan Brown gives us fluff. Mel Gibson, on the other hand, rips the essence of Mark right off the gospel pages and gives a riveting moment of theater. On the whole Christians are doing fine. I hope the movie turns out better than the book.
119 posted on 05/12/2006 4:59:30 PM PDT by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Henry Winkler is Jewish.

Yeah, but Arthur Fonzarelli wasn't.
120 posted on 05/12/2006 5:04:40 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson