I'll wait for the sequel - Da Vinci does Islam...
What an idiot. Does he not understand the concept of FICTION?
2 posted on
05/10/2006 7:14:43 PM PDT by
oolatec
To: Libloather
Great! It took just a single post this time to reveal to us dumbies the deep mysteryknown to only a lucky few: "It's FICTION, people!"
We're now anxiously awaiting the post that will reveal us another deeply held secret, that the only reason for the popularity of this piece of crap are the protests of the Catholic Church!
3 posted on
05/10/2006 7:18:41 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Libloather
I have never seen Catholics so freaked in my life. The molestation charges didn't get this reaction, although it was fairly close.
I'd like to see some polls where Catholics will leave the church if they see this movie.
This is stupidty beyond belief.
5 posted on
05/10/2006 7:21:02 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Libloather
These people take crap too seriously.
First we attacked Islam because they couldn't handle criticism, now are we suppose to attack Catholicism?
I'm ready to criticize if I must.
7 posted on
05/10/2006 7:22:10 PM PDT by
Vaak
To: Pyro7480
Pyro7480 on another, related thread:
Wow, we've gone 13 posts without someone saying "It's just fiction!"PING! This thread oughta make your day!
8 posted on
05/10/2006 7:24:36 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Libloather; Salvation
Too many are overreacting to this movie. Calling for a ban is absurd. By David Brown's own admission, this is a work of fiction.
I will not watch the movie in part because it attacks the Catholic Church. While I'm not Catholic, I regard the Church as a force for good and have great respect for its devout followers. But placing a ban on a film denies the individual to make his or her own choice.
The only legitimate way to undermine this movie is to refuse to pay money to see it.
9 posted on
05/10/2006 7:25:15 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
To: Libloather
"It's something that we should not be talking about," he said, referring to the movie's storyline. "We might get struck by lightning." How did the crazy old guy from Friday the 13th ("You're all doomed!") get appointed as the Philippine president's executive secretary?
10 posted on
05/10/2006 7:26:43 PM PDT by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: Libloather
He should have waited till next week, that would have been just in time for opening weekend. It'll probably still help a little though. You cant buy advertising like this.
11 posted on
05/10/2006 7:26:45 PM PDT by
OmegaMan
To: Libloather
That's over the top. It's fiction. Angels and Demons on the other hand is not seen as anti-Catholic.
14 posted on
05/10/2006 7:31:30 PM PDT by
Ptarmigan
(Ptarmigans will rise again!)
To: Libloather
Well, that oughta bring 'em in, or I don't know Arkansas.
To: Libloather
central premise is that Jesus Christ sired a child by Mary Magdalene. The local radio talk-show host has been taking calls asking why Catholics are so offended by this book.
I got about half-way through before it bogged down and got boring but it seems to me that Catholics would not be the only ones who would have reason to take offense. An overbearing theme in this book seems to be the whole "goddess" concept which would hit a discerning Protestant with just as bad taste in the mouth.
17 posted on
05/10/2006 7:33:23 PM PDT by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: Libloather
Unfortunately, bad books tend to make good movies (see the pulp lit of the '30s and '40s), so it's hopeless to fight this one, especially since it's a thriller with stars playing (as usual) themselves, and, according to the propaganda, the book sold 40 million copies worldwide (40 million or less, the author is crying all the way to the Swiss bank.) But the education campaign must continue.
If only the book were better literature, like Umberto Eco's novels. It's always a shame when kitsch succeeds to such a degree.
19 posted on
05/10/2006 7:40:15 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Libloather
Better yet, a cartoon Da Vinci does Islam.
24 posted on
05/10/2006 7:55:55 PM PDT by
Screamname
(By God, pray for me, someone help me please! Hillary is my Senator! HELP MEEE!)
To: Libloather
"
Ramon Arguelles of the archdiocese of Lipa, south of Manila, said the movie was an affront to Christianity.."Of course it is, so what else is new?
It would seem like the Lord is using things like this book and movie to filter the real believers out of the population. Those that know their Bible won't take this story seriously for an instant.
It could be that this, along with several other manifestations in the world, portend some exciting times ahead.
To: Libloather
I read the book and ... wow ... I'm still a Catholic!!!
It's a fictional book, nothing more.
27 posted on
05/10/2006 8:21:05 PM PDT by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
To: Libloather
Da Vinci does Islam... Followed by the final chapter ... "Islam does Dan Brown".
28 posted on
05/10/2006 8:24:19 PM PDT by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
To: Libloather
Good for Eduardo Ermita! I think its great he's suggesting his government take a stand for Christians here. We all remember a film 15 years ago by Scorcese that portrayed the same lie about Christ and Mary Magdelane. Fiction = Lies.
32 posted on
05/10/2006 9:36:30 PM PDT by
rjp2005
To: Libloather
33 posted on
05/10/2006 10:32:25 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: RusIvan; Romanov; Freelance Warrior
38 posted on
05/12/2006 1:32:26 PM PDT by
lizol
(Liberal - a man with his mind open ... at both ends)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson