Posted on 05/01/2006 11:01:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
As scholars grapple with the reality that a growing number of important works -- like the Ur-Nammu tablet and the recently unveiled Gospel of Judas -- lack a clear provenance, those ethics policies are the focus of heated debate. On one side are archaeologists and other experts who say that most objects without a clear record of ownership or site of origin were looted, and that the publication of such material aggrandizes collectors and encourages the illicit trade. On the other side are those who argue that ignoring such works may be even more damaging to scholarship than the destruction caused by looting... In recent days more than 100 scholars in the United States and Europe have signed a controversial statement asserting that the publishing restrictions are forcing them to "close their eyes to important information." The statement was drafted by Lawrence E. Stager, an archaeologist at Harvard University, and has been posted on the Web site of Biblical Archaeology Review, a journal that does not have restrictions on unprovenanced works.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Publication of Unprovenanced Artifacts Statement of ConcernWe are archaeologists and scholars who deal with archaeological materials from the ancient Near East and the Mediterranean basin. We wish to express our concern at a movement that has received much publicity lately that condemns the use of unprovenanced antiquities from consideration in the reconstruction of ancient history. On the contrary, a history of this region cannot be written without the evidence from unprovenanced antiquities...
Biblical Archaeology Review
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Archeologists are just peeved that they didn't get to the loot first.
Sounds similar to the big bioethics fight many years ago over whether or not to make life saving use of "tainted" knowledge gleaned from Nazi "experiments" in hypothermia; or to ignore the body of data, until it could be recreated by conducting humane, ethical research in the area, while allowing people to needlessly die.
This bears keeping an eye on it.
Removing relics vs. preserving history (op-ed)
Christian Science Monitor | May 17, 2006 | Randy Salzman
Posted on 05/17/2006 11:48:46 AM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1633768/posts
Director of Getty Is Unrattled by Claims of Italy and Greece to Antiquities
New York Times | May 15, 2006 | Hugh Eakin
Posted on 05/17/2006 11:53:13 AM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1633771/posts
|
|||
Gods |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.