Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quantum computer works best switched off
NewScientist ^ | 22 February 2006

Posted on 02/23/2006 3:58:12 AM PST by S0122017

Quantum computer works best switched off

Even for the crazy world of quantum mechanics, this one is twisted. A quantum computer program has produced an answer without actually running.

The idea behind the feat, first proposed in 1998, is to put a quantum computer into a “superposition”, a state in which it is both running and not running. It is as if you asked Schrödinger's cat to hit "Run".

With the right set-up, the theory suggested, the computer would sometimes get an answer out of the computer even though the program did not run. And now researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have improved on the original design and built a non-running quantum computer that really works.

They send a photon into a system of mirrors and other optical devices, which included a set of components that run a simple database search by changing the properties of the photon.

The new design includes a quantum trick called the Zeno effect. Repeated measurements stop the photon from entering the actual program, but allow its quantum nature to flirt with the program's components - so it can become gradually altered even though it never actually passes through.

"It is very bizarre that you know your computer has not run but you also know what the answer is," says team member Onur Hosten.

This scheme could have an advantage over straightforward quantum computing. "A non-running computer produces fewer errors," says Hosten. That sentiment should have technophobes nodding enthusiastically.

Journal reference: Nature (vol 439, p 949)

From issue 2540 of New Scientist magazine, 22 February 2006, page 21


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: quantum; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: wolfpat

lol


41 posted on 02/23/2006 5:33:31 AM PST by Talking_Mouse (Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Ok, I get that, but I guess I don't see how "it's nature" then interacts with the computer. Why are we stopping the photon in the first place because it will JUST pass thru and not interact?

But it will interact, all particles will interact when they hit something or even are close enough for field effects. And by allowing a whole particle to enter it will only add to the inaccuracy of the answer produced cause it keeps on throwing quantum 'signatures' around. If you prevent it from entering the measurement area but let it get close enough to allow an occasional 'imprint' through into the optics it will be far more precise. It's like how photos are sharp when the film is only exposed for a moment but fuzzy when they keep the film exposed (when photographing something moving.
42 posted on 02/23/2006 5:36:11 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat
The answer is .....42.

Do dolphins know the question?

43 posted on 02/23/2006 5:40:34 AM PST by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

"They stole this idea from John Kerry's "Plan"!"

That's what I was thinking..It was on before it was off.


44 posted on 02/23/2006 5:45:13 AM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: S0122017

Hmmm. So if I have a computer that works when it isn't on, can it also answer questions that haven't been asked?


45 posted on 02/23/2006 5:54:19 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: S0122017

Is this why I hear voices in my head even when I'm not listening to anyone?


46 posted on 02/23/2006 5:56:35 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jporcus

That reminds me of an old joke:

Rene Descartes walks into a bar and orders a beer. He sits, drinking it slowly, nursing it for quite a while, but eventually he finishes it. The bartender, noticing this, asks Descartes "Would you like another?", at which point Descartes replies "I think not" and promptly disappears.


47 posted on 02/23/2006 5:59:11 AM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-

Damn that Descartes, never paid a bar tab in his life!


48 posted on 02/23/2006 6:09:51 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I title of the article is a bit misleading, it's journalism afterall. They want something to sound interesting.

The computer does run but at another level than computers are supposed to run.

It still requires input though, the input just doesnt have to be in direct contact with the computer.


49 posted on 02/23/2006 6:11:11 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
Next question....

Can I study by placing the book under my pillow?

50 posted on 02/23/2006 6:19:47 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pointsal

Lol. Quantum effects occur at sub-atomic level, so if youre brain and book are in that size-range, yes.


51 posted on 02/23/2006 6:25:57 AM PST by S0122017
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BooksForTheRight.com

Good grief ...

"There is a very high-level principle that says that something and its opposite can not exist at the same time." Nonsense.

The principle you might mean to invoke is better stated as "A thing may not both be and NOT be at the same time." You illustrate this in your next sentenced quite clearly.

"Any science that claims that a "cat" can be alive and dead at the same time is invalid." Again, nonsense.

NO 'science' claims this. Schroedinger used this imagery to illustrate a 'thought experiment' concerning the emerging model of Quantum Physics. ( N.B. No actual cats were harmed during the production and discussion of this model. )

To proceed from these defective premises to the conclusion that 'particle physics is not a true science' is simple evidence of deficient reasoning.


52 posted on 02/23/2006 6:42:34 AM PST by 21stCenturion ("It's the Judges, Stupid !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: S0122017

Once they engage that single photon, theorectically the computer is charged, thus "on". It also shouldn't have to play the '0' '1' binary interactive game to seek solution.

OK, brain hurts, need coffee.......


53 posted on 02/23/2006 6:52:05 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: globalheater

"as a photon might do interference with itself on a double slit as long as we detect where it NOT has gone through, in wich case the interference is not observed ?"

That's correct. You are understanding the theory---as long as you don't think about it!


54 posted on 02/23/2006 6:53:29 AM PST by strategofr ( Davidson: "...50 or more [like Foster]..murdered [by Clintons]." Hillary's Secret War, Poe, p. 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: S0122017

...where's the "OFF" switch?


55 posted on 02/23/2006 6:54:14 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

"Hmmm. So if I have a computer that works when it isn't on, can it also answer questions that haven't been asked?"

I understand your question. I would have answered it---had you not asked at.


56 posted on 02/23/2006 6:55:20 AM PST by strategofr ( Davidson: "...50 or more [like Foster]..murdered [by Clintons]." Hillary's Secret War, Poe, p. 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jporcus

"I am not, therefore I think"

I applaud your insight. Can't hear me? That's because I'm clapping with one hand.


57 posted on 02/23/2006 6:57:16 AM PST by strategofr ( Davidson: "...50 or more [like Foster]..murdered [by Clintons]." Hillary's Secret War, Poe, p. 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-

"Rene Descartes walks into a bar and orders a beer. He sits, drinking it slowly, nursing it for quite a while, but eventually he finishes it. The bartender, noticing this, asks Descartes "Would you like another?", at which point Descartes replies "I think not" and promptly disappears."

I laughed this joke before I read it.


58 posted on 02/23/2006 6:58:30 AM PST by strategofr ( Davidson: "...50 or more [like Foster]..murdered [by Clintons]." Hillary's Secret War, Poe, p. 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

"Damn that Descartes, never paid a bar tab in his life!"

LOL!


59 posted on 02/23/2006 6:59:52 AM PST by strategofr ( Davidson: "...50 or more [like Foster]..murdered [by Clintons]." Hillary's Secret War, Poe, p. 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: S0122017
This quantum computer program makes me think of Hanoi John, "I was on before I was off".

But I still must post the obligatory Scotty photo.


60 posted on 02/23/2006 7:01:48 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (More people died in Ted Kennedy's car than hunting with Dick Cheney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson