Posted on 02/06/2006 8:53:10 AM PST by highlander_UW
DETROIT -- Three weeks ago, after the Steelers held on to upset Indianapolis, Joey Porter was unhappy about the overturning of Troy Polamalu's fourth-quarter interception that could have sealed the win much earlier. Believing that deep down the league preferred Peyton Manning and the Colts to win, Porter publicly criticized the game officials, asking them not to "take the game from us."
Well, the Steelers can call it even now, as the officials who performed well enough throughout the season to earn the privilege of working Super Bowl XL performed Sunday as though they were trying to make it up to the Steelers by giving them the game -- not just any game, but the biggest game. And, yes, this time the other guys, the Seahawks, cried conspiracy, only not quite as loudly as Porter.
"You know, that's what happens when the world is against you," one Seahawk said after the 21-10 loss at Ford/Heinz Field. "No one wanted us to win. They wanted Jerome Bettis to win and go out a hero, and they got it."
Seattle had its share of goats: in particular, tight end Jerramy Stevens, who dropped four balls, and kicker Josh Brown, who missed two field-goal attempts. Almost to a man, the Seahawks pointed the blame finger at themselves for converting only one of three red zone attempts (when they had been the best in the league in that area, scoring a touchdown on 71.7 percent of their trips inside the 20-yard line); for allowing Ben Roethlisberger to improvise and complete a 37-yard pass to game MVP Hines Ward to the 1; for giving up a 75-yard touchdown run to Willie Parker; and for getting beaten by a trick play on Antwaan Randle El's pass to fellow receiver Ward for a touchdown, a first in Super Bowl history. If you read between the lines, though, they pretty much spelled out in bold letters that they had plenty of help in handing Pittsburgh its fifth Lombardi Trophy.
Namely, the boys in black and white.
"Those things are out of our control," Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck said of the three major penalties that helped change the game completely. Not saying the outcome of the game would have been any different, but for sure it would have been a different game. "That's the way [the officials] called them," Hasselbeck continued. "The Steelers played well enough to win tonight, and we didn't. They should get credit. It's disappointing, it's hard, but what are you going to do?"
Here's what referee Bill Leavy's crew did, point blank: It robbed Seattle. The Seahawks could have played better, sure. They could have done more to overcome the poor officiating. We understand that those things happen and all, but even with all the points Seattle left on the field, there's a good chance the Seahawks would have scored more than the Steelers if the officials had let the players play.
In the biggest game of the year, the biggest game in sports, even, the officials were just a little too visible. In that regard, the Super Bowl provided a fitting conclusion to a postseason packed with pitiful performances by the game's third team. There were incorrect down-by-contact rulings in both NFC wild-card games; a touchdown that could have gone either way and should have gone the other way -- in favor of Tampa Bay -- in the Bucs' loss to the Redskins; the Patriots got no love in Denver in being hit with a bogus pass interference penalty and not catching a break on Champ Bailey's fumble at the goal line that looked as though it could have been a touchback; and, of course, the Polamalu play.
Still, what happened to the Seahawks wasn't the same as, say, New England going into Denver and playing badly (five turnovers) on top of the bad calls. Seattle gained almost 400 yards and turned it over just once.
You see, you can spend weeks -- and we did; two, in fact -- analyzing and dissecting matchups and giving each team the edge in certain areas and trying to figure out how the game is going to play out, but the two things you can't account for are turnovers and officials. The latter were the X-factor Sunday. Edge: Steelers.
It actually was a fairly clean game from a penalty standpoint, without a whole lot of yellow on the field -- 10 accepted penalties between the teams. Seven were against the Seahawks, though, a team that tied with Indianapolis for the second-fewest penalties (94) in the regular season. But those calls against the Seahawks stuck out like the Space Needle on the Seattle skyline.
Consider: The Seahawks lost 161 yards to penalties when you combine the penalty yards (70) and the plays the flags wiped out (91). By halftime alone, when it trailed 7-3, Seattle had had 73 hard-earned yards and a touchdown eliminated.
Hasselbeck hit Darrell Jackson with an apparent 16-yard scoring pass in the first quarter, but the play came back when Jackson was called for offensive pass interference. It was a touch foul. Jackson extended his arm, yes, but both players were fighting for position, and he didn't create any separation by doing so. It was like a referee calling a hand-check in a key moment of Game 7 of the NBA Finals.
The Seahawks had to settle for three instead of seven.
Still, that was early, and that one didn't change the game as much as did a holding call against Sean Locklear early in the fourth quarter with Pittsburgh leading 14-10. That one wiped out an 18-yard catch by Stevens that would have taken the ball to the 1. Locklear supposedly held Clark Haggans, so instead of first-and-goal at the 1 and the chance to complete a 98-yard touchdown drive and take a three-point lead, Seattle faced first-and-20 at the 29.
Three plays later, Ike Taylor picked off a Hasselbeck pass, and Hasselbeck went low to make the tackle on Taylor's return and was called for a 15-yard personal foul for a low block. The Steelers set up shop at their 44. That one right there made no sense.
Pittsburgh likes to run its trick plays in the middle of the field. Boom! Four plays later, from Seattle's 43, Randle El took a reverse and threw a sweet strike on the run to Ward. It was 21-10, and that was all she wrote. Everyone knows how important it is to play Pittsburgh with a lead or with the score tied. The Steelers don't lose when they're up by 11.
Eleven just so happens to be the total points taken away by bogus calls. Some penalties meant points; others meant field position. A holding call in the second quarter negated Peter Warrick's 34-yard punt return that would have started Seattle in Pittsburgh territory.
By contrast, the Steelers might have gotten a break on Roethlisberger's 1-yard touchdown plunge on third-and-goal in the second quarter. Leavy reviewed the play under the booth's orders, since it occurred inside the two-minute mark, and while still photos of an airborne Roethlisberger showed that the ball might have broken the plane of the goal line, he landed short of it and reached the ball over. It was close. Head linesman Mark Hittner didn't seem so sure of it, hesitating before signaling touchdown.
"I don't think he scored," Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren said.
It was that kind of evening for the Seahawks, who represent a town where residents know all too well that when it rains, it pours. If having what seemed like 90 percent of the 68,200 in attendance waving Terrible Towels wasn't enough to make Seattle feel as though it was playing on the road, the officials called it as though the Seahawks actually were.
Pittsburgh capitalized on its opportunities. And guys like Bill Cowher, Ward, Dan Rooney and The Bus are all very deserving of a championship -- and it's nice to see them win one -- but it would have been better had it not happened like this. It's like the Seahawks said: Not taking anything away from the Steelers, but keep it real.
"We had a touchdown taken away from us, the first one we scored," said Hasselbeck, who was measured in his words but clear in his frustration, "and then we had the ball at the 1-yard line, they called a penalty on us. That was unfortunate."
"I thought they were offside [on the play Locklear was called for holding]," center Robbie Tobeck said. "I thought we had a free play on because they had two guys come across. You know, that's the game. In a game, there's situations you have to overcome, and all night long we didn't do a good job of overcoming those things, and that's something we've done all year."
In the offseason, 31 teams will be back at the drawing board, evaluating what they need to do to knock off the Steelers in the fall. After the postseason they just had, Mike Pereira and the NFL's crew of officials would be wise to take a long, hard look at themselves. It's a real shame when, on the game's biggest stage, the major players aren't players at all. We saw too much of the third team in Super Bowl XL and not enough Seahawks and Steelers.
Michael Smith is a senior writer for ESPN.com.
Both field goal attempts were from like over 50 yards. I remember clearly the first one was a 54 yard attempt. Every time the Seahawks got near the 35 yard line, the refs threw their terrible towels on the field, backed the seahawks back up past the 40 on bogus penalties.
The "seahawks missed their field goals and it cost them the game" argument is a joke.
I don't think the league put a fix in...it just seems like the refs were aware of the press and that most people were pulling for Bettis and the Steelers and didn't want to disappoint the majority.
Ping!
But what about all the profiles of the Steeler team members that were shown? What was that about, other than the fact that the winner was predetermined? No, this was some kind of affirmative action.
Watch the replay... he's not offside, he just had an excellent jump on Hasslebeck's cadence that gave him half a step. Hasslebeck should have adjusted by slipping in a hard count in there after the first time the DE got a good jump on the play.
I notice you never say that Pittsburgh played an extremely poor game last night. Rothlisberger was pathetic, with a 22.26 rating. Yeah, the Steelers won, and the Seahawks played even worse, but they had help.
I compare this game to Dallas mauling Buffalo 55-17 in 1993. If the Steelers had been playing that Dallas team, the Cowboys could have scored 80 points.
And, the refs were lousy and clearly biased. Anyone who missed that was not watching the game.
And Seattle was luck -- twice -- to not turn over the ball because the refs made bad calls. One on the "incomplete" pass that was really a catch and fumble (the fumble only went out of bounds because players pulled up after the whistle). Another on Hassleback's fumble that was incorrectly ruled "down by contact" -- that rule requires that the runner is either touched while down, or down as the result of contact with a defender. Hassleback was already going down on his own before the contact occurred, and no contact occurred when he was on the ground. The ball should have stayed with Pittsburgh.
The whiners only remember the calls that went against them. In addition to those above, there was also a missed -- and blatant -- block in the back on the INT return. That cost Pittsburgh far more field position than the lousy "low block" call cost Seattle after Hasslebeck's pick.
The Steelers and the Cowboys have already met in three Super Bowls. The Steelers won two of them and the Cowboys won one of them.
What I want to see is the low-angle shot of that same play, the one aligned with the plane of the end-zone. I know it exists, at least in video, but I have not been able to find it on the net anywhere. Unless I am totally blind, the ball broke the plane of the end-zone when it was approximately 2-3 feet off the ground, then Roethlisberger was hit and pushed back by the defender. The low-angle shot (I believe) will be the hard proof of the TD.
I figured that was just the media bias playing in.
It was destiny. Because, it's interesting to note how close the Steelers were to not even making the playoffs.
On November 13, the Kansas City Chiefs (5-3 then, 10-6 at season's end) put in what proved to be their worst performance of the season. At home (Arrowhead Stadium), the Chiefs lost 14-3 to the hapless Buffalo Bills (3-5, 5-11).
If that game had turned out as it "should" have, the Steelers (11-5) would have been at home watching the playoffs and Super Bowl XL.
It seems the Steelers were destined to win one for the thumb.
LOL.
Hmmm, how many points would darling Dallas have scored on Seattle then?
Dallas won their fifth Super Bowl ten years ago.
Over Pittsburgh.
What took you so long?
And "MVP" Alexander got less than 100 rushing yards and one fewer rushign TD than Rothlisberger. Who cares about the stats, it's about opportunities. What really matters is that Pittsburgh got three chances to score TDs, and made the most of all three. Seattle walked away with FG attempts after making stupid mistakes (penalties and/or bad clock management).
Mike Ditka said that the Steelers won those three playoff games away from home, were on a role, were a team of destiny and would win the Super Bowl.
Turned out he was right. The Steelers were an irrestable force.
The game was lousy...so the Steelers won a lousy game...it's not about whinning it's about objective observational fact.
We were hoping to get to beat the Cowboys again for old time's sake. Finally got sick of waiting. ;)
The Super Bowl has been going on for 40 years. Both the Steelers and the Cowboys have five Super Bowl wins.
The Steelers have lost one Super Bowl. How many Super Bowls have the Cowboys lost, besides losing to the Steelers twice?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.