To: Supernatural
You would think people would be saying, "Pittsburgh won the game, 21-10. Congratulations, Pittsburgh fans". But no, they want to piss on the Steelers victory instead. Never seen such poor "sportsmanship" in my life. I notice you never say that Pittsburgh played an extremely poor game last night. Rothlisberger was pathetic, with a 22.26 rating. Yeah, the Steelers won, and the Seahawks played even worse, but they had help.
I compare this game to Dallas mauling Buffalo 55-17 in 1993. If the Steelers had been playing that Dallas team, the Cowboys could have scored 80 points.
87 posted on
02/06/2006 10:04:54 AM PST by
sinkspur
(Trust, but vilify.)
To: sinkspur; beyond the sea
The Steelers and the Cowboys have already met in three Super Bowls. The Steelers won two of them and the Cowboys won one of them.
90 posted on
02/06/2006 10:09:16 AM PST by
Supernatural
(All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
To: sinkspur; Supernatural
I compare this game to Dallas mauling Buffalo 55-17 in 1993. If the Steelers had been playing that Dallas team, the Cowboys could have scored 80 points.LOL.
Hmmm, how many points would darling Dallas have scored on Seattle then?
94 posted on
02/06/2006 10:14:02 AM PST by
beyond the sea
(Cal Thomas: If only Robert Bork had cried ...................)
To: sinkspur
I notice you never say that Pittsburgh played an extremely poor game last night. Rothlisberger was pathetic, with a 22.26 rating. And "MVP" Alexander got less than 100 rushing yards and one fewer rushign TD than Rothlisberger. Who cares about the stats, it's about opportunities. What really matters is that Pittsburgh got three chances to score TDs, and made the most of all three. Seattle walked away with FG attempts after making stupid mistakes (penalties and/or bad clock management).
96 posted on
02/06/2006 10:16:34 AM PST by
kevkrom
("...no one has ever successfully waged a war against stupidity" - Orson Scott Card)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson