Posted on 01/21/2006 10:29:50 PM PST by texas booster
OK, new thread for the next week.
First, a big shout out to the SETI and BOINC members who have added CPUs to the effort. Remember, its Team 36120, NOT Team 0.
Next, congrats to all for bumping our team up to 512 processors and 220 user names. We have a number of new users in the team, with over a dozen folders now from GetLoaded.com all popping onto the hit list this week.
We now have ten members who have contributed at least 10,000 points each. Klutz Dohanger, Malsua, Ken in Texas, Andrewksu, LSimpson, kingu, Uriah, arderenne and rach_FR have all reached this milestone. Papasmurf and Senator Bedfellow will join them this next week. Great job!
Even more impressive, our team now boasts 132 members who have folded at least 1,000 points. That is more than the entire number of CPUs folding for our erstwhile left-wing environazi competitors!
Free Republic Folding@Home Stats Page
On the global front, Free Republic Folders is now listed at # 401. We will be in the Top 400 on Sunday!
As we continue to grow there are a number of milestones coming around the bend:
Top 300 by February
Top 250 by the end of the February
We have 800,000 points so far and have folded over 6,400 WU. We will reach an exalted mark of folding a million points per month, each and every month! Fantastic!
Thanks again to all that are helping us advance science and promote the peaceful use of computers.
Extreme Overclockers Stats for Free Republic
Want to see why we fold?
Papasmurf: Think you don't make a difference?
I just started doing this. I usually just leave my system up but I need to reboot since I installed new software. Will the Folding restart automatically or do I need to restart it?
http://nickciske.com/tools/binary.php
For the people who don't understand post #141 (or should I say post # 10001101 )
Sorry no. But you will get a faster 'puter!
Ooooppppssss I see you posted a translator earlier. I gotta read ALL the thread before I post :-)
01010000 01110010 01101111 01100010 01100001 01100010 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00101100 00100000 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01101100 01100101 01100001 01110011 01110100 00100000 01110101 01101110 01110100 01101001 01101100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01101001 01110010 00100000 01100111 01110010 01100001 01101110 01100100 01101011 01101001 01100100 01110011 00101100 00100000 01100111 01110010 01100001 01100100 01110101 01100001 01110100 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100110 01110010 01101111 01101101 00100000 01110011 01101111 01101101 01100101 01110100 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101111 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01101110 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101100 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110010 01110100 01110011 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 01100111 01100101
If you selected the option to "Run F@H as a Service" when you installed, you will not have to restart the program manually, it will start by itself. If you are running Windows you will see the icon appear in your system tray near the clock.
Thanks for the info Mr Marion! :-)
Sorry about the margins guys, I just hit abuse on myself.
Here's what I was trying to say...
01001001 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100011 01101000 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101100 01101001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110000 01101111 01110011 01110100 00100000 00110001 00110011 00110001 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100100 01100101 01100011 01101111 01100100 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101111 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110011 01110011 01100001 01100111 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110010 01101111 01101101 00100000 01010011 01000011 00100000 01010011 01110111 01100001 01101101 01110000 00100000 01000110 01101111 01111000
Yeah I just asked for my post 141 to be removed 'cause it went toooooooo long.
This just sounds wrong...
Felt good...
Use the link in #135.
Pande's first point was that Hyperthreading does not give you two full CPUs. From his observations, running two consoles on a HT processor provides you about 20% greater throughput versus running one folding program.
I think his issue was more predicated on the fact that running two consoles on an HT machine slows down the progress for an individual WU.
Suppose they release 10,000 new WUs for processing, which will average 2 to 4 days to get the results back. The WUs that are grabbed by HT machines running two consoles will be returned over 3-6 days, delaying their work in evaluating the results. His goal is to get the results sent back as soon as possible. But, he also understands that teams are trying to get points, so he won't complain if the results are delayed a bit because you're exploiting Hyper-Threading.
Hyperthreading is still a single cpu.
If we have one program using the cpu 100%, hyperthreading gains us very little. There is little idle time for the logical cpu to spend executing.
Since Folding is a single-threaded process, it wouldn't matter. Two consoles would be tough to gain anything on a HT box. I would think 20% is very optimistic. But they know how their program executes :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.