Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PORN-AGAIN STAR (actor Stephen Baldwin, born-again Christian, acts against nabe sex shop)
NY POST ^ | 1/18/06 | BILL HOFFMANN and HASANI GITTENS

Posted on 01/18/2006 8:08:47 AM PST by Liz


PEEPIN' STEPHEN: Stephen Baldwin, a born-again Christian, plans to snap photos of license plates of people going into a Nyack store once it's a sex shop, then publicize their names. Photo: Djamilla Rosa/WireImage.com

Actor Stephen Baldwin has his shorts in a bunch over a sex shop opening near his estate in Rockland County.....

The least-known of the Baldwins, Stephen, a born-again Christian, parked himself outside the Route 59 location in Nyack and took snapshots of construction workers walking in and out of the building.

Once the smut shop opens in a few months, the 39-year-old star of "The Usual Suspects" plans to photograph patrons' license plates and run their names in the local newspaper to shame them from ever returning.

His beef is that the store is within a quarter-mile of the community's residential area. "This is a thoroughfare that I drive by many, many times as do college kids, mothers with their children," Baldwin said.

He said he and other residents protested at Nyack planning-board meetings and asked the owner, Quintus Algama of Hollis, Queens, to choose a more distant location, but he wouldn't listen.

In addition to selling sex toys and porn, the shop will also feature video booths where patrons can watch hardcore flicks in total privacy.

"These guys want to do this business, God bless 'em. That's between them and God. They'll have to deal with that for eternity. But the people of Nyack do not want this location where it is," Baldwin said.

Baldwin said he's already enlisted the help of dozens of students of nearby Nyack College who'll be at the store the day it opens to protest.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: communitystandards; porn; porngood; stephenbaldwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-386 next last
To: mollynme

Papparazzi and others who photograph others with the purpose of shaming or embarrassing them and, as in the case of Baldwin, who is acting as a moral vigilante towards law abiding individuals and legal business, should be held up to contempt.


101 posted on 01/18/2006 9:51:01 AM PST by RTINSC (There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: RTINSC

Sounds like you favor hate crime laws.


102 posted on 01/18/2006 9:52:25 AM PST by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
Some of ....actually...most of the answers posted here are appalling!

I know what you mean. I see more and more of it on FR. More sex threads, praise for homosexual movies, nothing wrong with porn, etc.....nothing conservative about them. I just figure FR is going in a different direction than the homepage would lead one to believe.

103 posted on 01/18/2006 9:56:29 AM PST by yellowdoghunter (I sometimes only vote for Republicans because they are not Democrats...by Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mollynme

I do not favor hate crime laws. I believe in following the laws we have and believe moral vigilanties such as Baldwin (and perhaps you) should work to change laws and not impute your personal beliefs on others to shame them.


104 posted on 01/18/2006 9:58:32 AM PST by RTINSC (There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

Don't know what he said, but Howard doesn't bring people on to challenge him. All he did was hand him ratings.


105 posted on 01/18/2006 9:58:56 AM PST by SteveMcKing ("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter
I just figure FR is going in a different direction than the homepage would lead one to believe.

That's because conservatism is much more than just social conservatism.
106 posted on 01/18/2006 10:04:38 AM PST by Sirloin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow

< Peyton Manning voice > "Mr. Baldwin, would you sign my melon?"


107 posted on 01/18/2006 10:04:52 AM PST by TheBigB ("Pitts. has no chance indoors against Indy. NONE."~~maineman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Liz
He's probably mad because one of the local yokels got his VIP video booth seat all sticky and guey.
108 posted on 01/18/2006 10:05:03 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RTINSC
Since I see nothing wrong with what he is doing, I'll let you work to push for the laws that will limit Mr. Baldwin's freedoms.
109 posted on 01/18/2006 10:06:40 AM PST by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: mollynme

I see no reason to change our laws. Nor will I change my view that people like you and Baldwin who think shaming people because of your personal beliefs, is appropriate behavior..


110 posted on 01/18/2006 10:20:48 AM PST by RTINSC (There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
"Remember kids - porn is bad. But pot movies are cool!"

Click on the "more" link below the cast list :)

111 posted on 01/18/2006 10:24:40 AM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: mollynme; RTINSC
Papparazzi and others who photograph others with the purpose of shaming or embarrassing them

I see you hold Mr. Baldwin responsible for the embarrassment and shame of those who patronize these establishments.

By this reasoning, the owners of these establishments are responsible for the shame and embarrassment of Mr. Baldwin and their children when they are subjected to these businesses.

112 posted on 01/18/2006 10:26:24 AM PST by Lijahsbubbe (Ted Koppel interviewed for Al Jazeera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Within a week of opening this porn shop will have drug dealers and prostitutes hanging in the parking lot. I predict a shooting within 6 months of opening.

I've been to a number of sex shops and none of them had drug dealers or prostitutes hanging out in the parking lot.

As near as I can figure there are three types of sex shops. First the women's type sex shop like "Lovers Package". No one seems to complain too much about these places although they sell plenty of porn and sex toys in addition to lingerie. They are invariably staffed by women who seem to be totally uninhibited in their conversations. They aren't prostitutes however. The clientele is about 50/50 male to female.

Second are the porn mega-stores. These get protested, but there still aren't any prostitutes or dope dealers hanging around them. They have their own security guards who would run them off if they started to. They sell mainly overpriced porn, sextoys and lingerie. Their clientele is probably about 60/40 male to female. The clerks are either male or female and tend to be heavily tatooed and pierced. These are the places where porn stars go to make guest appearances and sign autographs.

Last is the dirty book store. These are invariably hole in the wall kinds of places run by some fat, sleazy looking dirtbag. They both buy and sell porn and half the store is ussually devoted to used porn. They generally have a few sex toys, no lingerie and some nasty video booths in the back. The clientele is 100% male or close to it and a good deal of it is gay. It's been a few years since I've been in of these places, but I've never seen a prostitute or drug dealer hanging out in their parking lots.

If you're looking for prostitutes and drug dealers check the cheap motels and apartments surrounding airports and military bases.

113 posted on 01/18/2006 10:29:41 AM PST by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

I know you were joking about Viva Rock Vegas being the pinnacle of his career, but check out his list of movies at IMDB.com. I think you were right.


114 posted on 01/18/2006 10:31:22 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Good for Mr. Baldwin. He's not ashamed to call a sin a sin and to point out that there should be shame associated with it.


115 posted on 01/18/2006 10:33:29 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

Joking? : )


116 posted on 01/18/2006 10:35:53 AM PST by TheBigB ("Pitts. has no chance indoors against Indy. NONE."~~maineman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I wonder whether he's only going to publish information from photos he takes himself.

If he's more...promiscuous than that, it might be fun to feed him photos of actual cars in the parking lot of the store, but with license plates of certain prominent individuals Photoshopped in. Let Baldwin track down and publish the names. Then mail the newspaper clippings to the offended parties, and grab some popcorn.

117 posted on 01/18/2006 10:38:47 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

If you find businesses like this objectionable, you should take action to change your local ordinances and zoning. Is it against the law to own an adult oriented business? Are patrons committing a crime by patronizing these legal businesses? Holding people up to shame because you find something they do morally objectionable is, IMO, shameful..


118 posted on 01/18/2006 10:42:15 AM PST by RTINSC (There is no guarantee of Success but Failure is guaranteed if you are not successful..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Sure about that?


119 posted on 01/18/2006 10:48:30 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: RTINSC
Are patrons committing a crime by patronizing these legal businesses? Holding people up to shame because you find something they do morally objectionable is, IMO, shameful..

Your entire argument is based on what you feel is right.

If what Mr. Baldwin is doing is not illegal, then you are guilty of the same moral superiority that you claim Baldwin is acting on.

And, I might add, you seem to take it a step further by telling Freepers what YOU THINK they should do.

120 posted on 01/18/2006 10:53:14 AM PST by Lijahsbubbe (Ted Koppel interviewed for Al Jazeera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-386 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson