Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weak Ratings May Be Final Chapter For 'Book Of Daniel'
Mediapost.CT ^ | 1/17/06 | David Goetzl

Posted on 01/17/2006 8:17:11 PM PST by LdSentinal

NBC'S "THE BOOK OF DANIEL" may be off the air soon--more because of Nielsen issues than sins against a higher power.

Ratings for the controversial drama dropped 23 percent Friday among adults 18-49 versus its Jan. 6 premiere. With a 2.2 mark, the show lost 36 percent of its "Dateline" lead-in. (Viewers declined by two million, or 29 percent, compared to the week before.)

A call to NBC on Monday was not returned; the network's Web site says the show is scheduled to air this Friday.

The drama about a liberal Episcopalian priest who pops pills and has a gay son sparked a protest by the conservative American Family Association, which charged that it "demeans the Christian faith." The AFA urged people to call their local NBC affiliates and ask them not to air the show, which several stations did. The group also targeted advertisers that supported the show's first episode.

But in the end, the declining ratings may do the AFA's bidding.

"The real mark against 'The Book of Daniel' is not any antipathy it might show toward the family or sympathy for the devil," wrote The New York Times. "The real objection is that it's just not very good."


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: afa; affiliates; bias; bigotry; bookofdaniel; crap; haha; hollyweird; liberal; nbc; nielsen; ratings; thebookofdaniel; trashtv

1 posted on 01/17/2006 8:17:12 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

It is a pathetic show. that is for sure/


2 posted on 01/17/2006 8:19:33 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (We have a mission from beyond the stars to spread freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

How to make it a hit? Convert the characters to Islam, center everything around a mosque, and add a laugh track.


3 posted on 01/17/2006 8:20:21 PM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Stick a fork in this turkey and hope such garbage is never again resurrected.


4 posted on 01/17/2006 8:20:34 PM PST by AZRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

It is both disrespectful and B-O-R-I-N-G by most accounts.


5 posted on 01/17/2006 8:21:20 PM PST by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"The real objection is that it's just not very good."

Neither is Hollywood anymore. They are so divorced from reality.

I don't spend my money on traitors, freaks and perverts anymore.

6 posted on 01/17/2006 8:21:51 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"The real mark against 'The Book of Daniel' is not any antipathy it might show toward the family or sympathy for the devil," wrote The New York Times. "The real objection is that it's just not very good."

Suuuuuuure.

I guess they will try again, with another show that tries to make a mockery of Christianity -- but next time, they will make it a quality show.

7 posted on 01/17/2006 8:23:18 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"Ratings for the controversial drama dropped 23 percent Friday among adults 18-49 versus its Jan. 6 premiere."

Whoa, didn't see THAT one coming.

A better way of putting it would be: "Ratings for the controversial drama were inflated 23 percent among morbidly curious adults 18-49 in its Jan.6 premiere, until they went back to doing what they were doing before..."
8 posted on 01/17/2006 8:23:20 PM PST by decal (Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

from the link: "Ratings for the controversial drama dropped 23 percent Friday among adults 18-49 versus its Jan. 6 premiere. With a 2.2 mark, the show lost 36 percent of its "Dateline" lead-in. (Viewers declined by two million, or 29 percent, compared to the week before.)"

So it looks like it hurt Dateline, as well.


9 posted on 01/17/2006 8:23:22 PM PST by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Uh, yeah. It has low ratings (DOT) and that's why it's being cancelled. It has nothing to do with the fact that it slams religion (DOT)

Gee, you'd think sooner or later someone at the networks would connect the DOTS.

10 posted on 01/17/2006 8:24:05 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun
It is both disrespectful and B-O-R-I-N-G by most accounts.

So you're saying pissing in middle America's face AND being dull isn't going to garner an audience?

Maybe they should make it more irreverent.....

11 posted on 01/17/2006 8:26:41 PM PST by papertyger (We have done the impossible, and that makes us mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal; Charles Henrickson; mikrofon
Daniel 2:21-22:

21
And [the LORD] changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding:

22
He revealeth the deep and secret things (yea, which television shows sucketh): he knoweth what is in the darkness, and the light dwelleth with him.

12 posted on 01/17/2006 8:27:33 PM PST by martin_fierro (Herein endeth the lesson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

So what if nobody is watching it, it won't stop SoddomWood from giving it every award they have! Perhaps they should try the same attacks on Mooselips??

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


13 posted on 01/17/2006 8:27:53 PM PST by bray (President Bush Protects America. The Rats Protect Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
How to make it a hit? Convert the characters to Islam, center everything around a mosque, and add a laugh track.

LOL!

14 posted on 01/17/2006 8:32:32 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
When it comes to TV programming to the lowest common denominator, ya gotta wonder how low is low.

IMHO, this program answers that question.

15 posted on 01/17/2006 8:41:15 PM PST by upchuck (Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Neither is Hollywood anymore.

If the three major networks disappeared tomorrow, no one in my family (except maybe my 21-year-old daughter) would even notice.

We are all more interested in Discovery, The Learning Channel, the History Channel, AMC, TCM, and even the occasional PBS special.

Network prime time shows are formulaic drivel, except for maybe Monk, '24', Law & Order, NYPD Blue and Crossing Jordan.

16 posted on 01/17/2006 8:42:27 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
NBC'S "THE BOOK OF DANIEL" may be off the air soon--more because of Nielsen issues than sins against a higher power.

Yeah, a few tens of millions of Christians who refuse to watch it couldn't have anything to do with those ratings.

[shaking head]

MM

17 posted on 01/17/2006 8:43:23 PM PST by MississippiMan (Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
"The real objection is that it's just not very good."

Gee,make a TV show that highlights about every dysfunction our society can think to offer and than wonder why it isn`t good.</rolling eyes>

18 posted on 01/18/2006 4:01:36 AM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson