Skip to comments.
NFL LIVE THREAD, Sunday, Jan.15,2006
Posted on 01/15/2006 9:24:47 AM PST by mainepatsfan
Pittsburgh vs. Indianapolis 1:00 PM EST
Carolina vs. Chicago 4:30 PM EST
TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: bores; broncos; carolinapanthers; chicagobears; denverbroncos; football; indianapoliscolts; nfl; pittsburghsteelers; playoffs; sports; steelers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 2,021-2,035 next last
To: ABG(anybody but Gore); akorahil; albee; A message; andyland; Argh; b4its2late; BADROTOFINGER; ...
PING
To: mainepatsfan
Here we go again. Bummer about the Pats last night, divisional round homefield is not to be triffled with.
3
posted on
01/15/2006 9:25:27 AM PST
by
discostu
(a time when families gather together, don't talk, and watch football... good times)
To: discostu
No it is not. The Steelers would be well advised not turn the ball over five times today.
To: mainepatsfan; All
Go Bears!!! It is not going to be easy like it was the last time...
5
posted on
01/15/2006 9:28:06 AM PST
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: discostu; All
What ! what a lame Live Thread , only 3 posts! ...LOL
Everyone- the purpose of the Live Thread is to have fun and hopefully enjoy the games together, can we please try to be civil and respect each other here?
The trash talk and "taunting" has been very disappointing the past couple of weeks.
6
posted on
01/15/2006 9:28:50 AM PST
by
scott says
(MSM=Morons Spouting Misinformation)
To: mainepatsfan
Four teams I don't care about. I'd call the Colts, but hey, New England was the favorite going into Denver too.
*groan*
7
posted on
01/15/2006 9:28:59 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(Miami goes 9-7! Go Saban!)
To: KevinDavis
They're going to need their offense to generate some points this time.
To: mainepatsfan
9
posted on
01/15/2006 9:29:22 AM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: mainepatsfan; All
10
posted on
01/15/2006 9:30:01 AM PST
by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: Terpfen
If Indy does win today I wonder how big a favorite they'll be over Denver next week consdiering their recent playoff history against them.
To: mainepatsfan
Well, we will both be watching other teams this year..
12
posted on
01/15/2006 9:30:45 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(Hail to the Redskins!...It was a good year, we will be back next year...!)
To: discostu
Bummer about the Pats last night, They gave that game away.
To: scott says
The trash talk and "taunting" has been very disappointing the past couple of weeks.Normally it only takes one trash talker to ruin it for everything. Hopefully the usual suspects will remember: "It's only a game."
14
posted on
01/15/2006 9:31:04 AM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Petronski
Somehow I think they'll do a better job hanging on to the ball.
To: KevinDavis
If not today definitely next week.
To: bikepacker67
The only thing they didn't do was put a bow on it. I doubt Indy or Pittsburgh will be as generous next week.
To: mainepatsfan
Shame on Pittsburgh for not being prepared to cope with noise last time, and for letting the receivers get behind them SO OFTEN this year.
That being said, go Steelers!
18
posted on
01/15/2006 9:33:03 AM PST
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: cardinal4
I'm dissapointed obviously at how they went out last night but I'm proud of the way they fought back from where they were earlier this year. They'll be in good shape for another run next year.
To: mainepatsfan
No idea. I still can't believe Denver made it this far in the playoffs. Something about Jake Plummer annoys the heck out of me.
20
posted on
01/15/2006 9:34:08 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(Miami goes 9-7! Go Saban!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 2,021-2,035 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson