Indeed. And, since as we all know, it tastes like chicken, allow me to suggest a suitable product:
Posted on 12/20/2005 10:09:17 PM PST by churchillbuff
one key factor in the plot: both men are married, with children, and their long-standing relationship ultimately destroys both marriages.
Would commentators similarly applaud a story of cheating, if the adultery involved a married man and a married woman?
The main problem with "Broke Back Mountain" isn't that it's pro-gay; it's that the emphasis on following your urges rather than honoring your responsibilities is, at its heart, anti-marriage
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
May go see it, see what all the fuss is about. LOL
May go see it, see what all the fuss is about. LOL
That's because you live in the UK, and they are a twitter over elton john pudding eating legal partnership.
The hollyweirdos in the US are pushing the pudding eating shheepherders movie 24/7.
Oh yeah Tony, before you go on a tangent of how do I know you live in the UK, you posted here on FR before the Iraq war, as a saddam/terrorist appeaser and how you served in Northern Ireland.
Don't let Michael snow you on this one. I turned off my
radio while listening to him go on and on about how brilliant
the film is.
MEDVED FRAUD ALERT!!
You made this statement before, and when I asked you to quantify it you went quite.
Anyone who knows my posting record here knows I have never as you put it been a saddam/terrorist appeaser.
And what has my tours in North Ireland got to do with this. So prove it.
You were against the Iraq war, what else is there more to say.
According to Box Office Mojo almost none. I think more people have spoken out against the movie than actually seen it.
Was that when you said you were a committed Communist.
Getting a bit tipsy at elton's pudding reception there Tony?
That is why there is almost a two year gap between my last lot of posting and this that started at the beginning of this year.
Sorry Dane I just thought this is the bit where we make wild accusations not backed up with any fact.
And what Elton pudding
Thank you for your service, but please stop the riding the fence, ok, in Dec. 2002 you were all over FR saying getting rid of saddam would be a mistake, it wasn't and you know it, so when you get back you decide to post on FR threads promoting the homosexual agenda.
Do you wish to have john kerry's or hillary's addreeses to send them your resume? JMO, you would be a perfect fit.
Indeed. And, since as we all know, it tastes like chicken, allow me to suggest a suitable product:
I don't know, with the right wine and fava beans it might be alright.
"Mmmmmmmmm..."
OK lets be serous for a minute.
I never said getting rid of Saddam would be a mistake.
I did say that if we moved into Iraq getting rid of Saddam would be the easy bit, that we would have a long hard battle ahead of us.
I said that because I have a lot of military experience to back this up, and new I would be part of it.
Now that I said on my word of Honor, before you call me a liar.
As for this so when you get back you decide to post on FR threads promoting the homosexual agenda.
Look at my posting record I am posting on Iraq threads, discussing the conflict, look at my posting record.
I have posted too I guess 2 gay threads in my time here and that is only when there is not much else to post on, and usually with humour.
So look at my posting record
Mirror(UK)front page Dec. 20th, 2002.(no doubt getting information from your islamofascist hero george galloway).
Dane I like freeping, but I am sorry it has to be with someone who is intelligent , well intelligent enough to debate, and yes even back there comments up with facts.
So goodbye go and annoy some other poor sod.
So goodbye go and annoy some other poor sod
Your above is textbook liberal democrat/radical labour projection, have fun on FR being a DUmmie troll.
But you are not interested in that, someone wont say who has messaged me that what you do is you try and provoke someone to get them banned.
And I quite enjoy freeping here.
If I thought for a moment you were interested in debating rather than on some wind up mission, I would, but since your aim is just to annoy whats the point of debating with you
But you are not interested in that, someone wont say who has messaged me that what you do is you try and provoke someone to get them banned.
And I quite enjoy freeping here.
If I thought for a moment you were interested in debating rather than on some wind up mission, I would, but since your aim is just to annoy whats the point of debating with you
Oh sheesh, could you can the liberal martyrdom(I know an oxymoron, but the liberalism you promote is also an oxymoron).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.