Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ESPN Suspends Michael Irvin, But ESPN Article Never Says So
ESPN.com ^

Posted on 12/01/2005 7:25:52 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

Check out the ESPN article below. It states that "Michael Irvin will not make his scheduled appearances" this weekend. But it conveniently fails to mention that ESPN suspended him.

I suppose you can figure that out by reading between the lines, but to actually see the "S" word used, you would have to go to another media source, such as this MSNBC article, which is flatly headlined "ESPN Suspends Irvin Following Drug Arrest":

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10284945/

Some mighty sensitive souls in Bristol, CT, no?

----------------------------------------

Michael Irvin will not make his scheduled appearances on the Sunday and Monday Night NFL Countdown shows on Dec. 4 and 5, ESPN announced Thursday.

The former Cowboys wide receiver, who is in his third year as an analyst for the network, will resume his regular role on Sunday, Dec. 11.

Irvin was stopped for speeding on Friday, Nov. 25, in Plano, Texas, and arrested on an outstanding warrant for a previous speeding violation. His car was searched, revealing a pipe and plastic bags with marijuana residue.

He was then charged with possession of drug paraphernalia. He was taken into custody by the Plano police, and released later that evening.

ESPN first learned of the arrest on Sunday, Nov. 27.

"I understand I was wrong for not divulging the information on Friday," Irvin said today. "I accept ESPN's decision and look forward to return to my teammates next week."


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: espn; football; irvin; michaelirvin; nfl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

I saw an interview with Irvin on local (Dallas) TV, and without a script, he can barely put two coherent words together in a row!

It was almost impossible to make out what he was trying to say.


21 posted on 12/01/2005 7:53:40 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Yup, that's Donald. I'm sure your 40 yd. time is way faster ;-)


22 posted on 12/01/2005 7:56:20 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

what kind of suspension is it when he already knows when he is going to be back on air (Dec 11th)?

ESPN is treating this like they believe his story.


23 posted on 12/01/2005 7:57:44 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Interesting. I have to say that I've been pleasantly surprised by his unique point of view on the pre-game shows this year. I do think he adds something to the mix. That doesn't excuse his current mess, of course.


24 posted on 12/01/2005 7:57:45 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
ESPN is treating this like they believe his story.

Agreed, and in does strain credulity. In fairness, though, the MSNBC story does include information tending to support Irvin's version of events.

25 posted on 12/01/2005 8:00:28 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: csvset
I thought the pipe belonged to a friend. A friend that was in rehab. Wait a minute, was does a guy who was in rehab need a pipe?

He left rehab or at least that is what Irvin's preacher friend says.

26 posted on 12/01/2005 8:01:43 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I'd have to say that Rush was wrong in his judgment of McNabb. He turned out to be an excellent QB who got his team to the Super Bowl. That he got injured doesn't change that.

He said he was overrated at the time. Not that he wouldn't turn out to be a excellent QB down the line.

27 posted on 12/01/2005 8:04:12 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat
Seems like a lot of people have missed it, but ESPN's gone down the tubes the last five years or so.

They have way to many stupid programs on all their channels now.

28 posted on 12/01/2005 8:06:17 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Looks like the lawyers told ESPN to be careful what they say.


29 posted on 12/01/2005 8:12:26 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

You're probably right, though it's hard to see why ESPN couldn't call a suspension a suspension.


30 posted on 12/01/2005 8:17:37 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Yes indeed.


31 posted on 12/01/2005 8:19:36 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: csvset
I thought the pipe belonged to a friend. A friend that was in rehab.

He first told the police that it belonged to his brother. Then he stated that it was a friend who he considered to be a brother. I'm surprised he didn't claim it was his wife's pipe.

32 posted on 12/01/2005 8:20:32 PM PST by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Re: "But it conveniently fails to mention that ESPN suspended him."

Maybe they espnded him...

33 posted on 12/01/2005 8:23:58 PM PST by Bender2 (Even dirty old robots need love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

LOL!


34 posted on 12/01/2005 8:26:06 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

The b---- set me up!


35 posted on 12/01/2005 8:27:09 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Believe me...I am not "dissing" Brett...I have been a big fan of his...maybe I am just projecting that I would hate to go from being MVP..and Super Bowls, to a couple win season...

Sorry..


36 posted on 12/01/2005 8:49:05 PM PST by Txsleuth (9/11NEVER FORGET-NEVER SURRENDER, Sam Johnson, a REAL hero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Callahan

Not really, to be honest. The guy was playing with a sports hernia for the majority of the season.


37 posted on 12/01/2005 8:56:20 PM PST by indcons (Don't question either my intelligence or my ability; I have none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

yeah...

we will see. the man maintains his story and it hasn't wavered.


38 posted on 12/01/2005 10:52:33 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

In analyzing Irvin's story, think about this. How did he find out that this "friend" even had the pipe? Think about it...... Did he ask the guy AFTER arriving back home "Yo dog, you gotta pipe?" If that happened, I'm sure the "friend" would have said "Naw Playmaker.....I'm straight up!". So, did Irvin frisk him? Did the "friend" just realize he had it and gave it up? Or......were they pulling on the peace pipe together? You decide......


39 posted on 12/02/2005 7:43:24 AM PST by Niteranger68 ("Spare the rod, spoil the liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
He first told the police that it belonged to his brother. Then he stated that it was a friend who he considered to be a brother. I'm surprised he didn't claim it was his wife's pipe.

Don't forget the kids.

40 posted on 12/02/2005 7:44:30 AM PST by Niteranger68 ("Spare the rod, spoil the liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson