Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Sexy Attire Works Against Businesswomen
Live Science ^ | 11/29/05 | Staff

Posted on 11/29/2005 12:38:34 PM PST by Millee

Attractive people may sometimes have a leg up in climbing corporate ladders. But sexy presentation on its own can work against women who are already well up the ladder.

In a new study, men and women where shown videos of a businesswoman discussing her backgrounds and hobbies. In different tests, she played the part of either a receptionist or a manager. And in one round she wore flat shoes, slacks, and a turtleneck, all considered typical professional attire. In the other, she donned high-heels, a tight skirt, and a low-cut blouse.

The test subjects rated the businesswoman on competence and guessed at her college GPA and the quality of her Alma Mater.

The sexy outfit didn't affect their assessment of the receptionist. But the sexy manager was viewed as less competent.

"A female manager whose appearance emphasized her sexiness elicited less positive emotions, more negative emotions, and perceptions of less competence on a subjective rating scale and less intelligence on an objective scale," the researchers write in the December issue of Psychology of Women Quarterly. "Although various media directed toward women …encourage women to emphasize their sex appeal, our results suggest that women in high status occupations may have to resist this siren call to obtain the respect of their co-workers."

The research was led by Peter Glick, a professor of Psychology at Lawrence University in Appleton, Wisconsin.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: fashion; women; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last
To: PaulaB
That's a part of it. Our company isn't owned by one guy anymore, although it used to be, years ago. But I think his mindset lives on in the hiring practices, even though he died a while back.

We're actually owned by a very large company right now, who would probably be unhappy (on EEOC grounds) if they knew how we made hiring decisions.

41 posted on 11/29/2005 1:03:30 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When government does too much, nobody else does much of anything." -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Millee

I am going to need to see many, many, many example pictures before I can make a judgement.


42 posted on 11/29/2005 1:04:00 PM PST by day10 (Wherever you come near the human race there's layers and layers of nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peacebaby
The receptionist can show her boobs all she wants, and she'll stay in the $30,000 slot.

So THAT'S why I can't earn more than $30,000?....damn boobs...
43 posted on 11/29/2005 1:04:02 PM PST by Peepster (Saying that guns kill people is like saying spoons make Michael Moore fat!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Millee

Okay! Lunch at Hooters tomorrow!


44 posted on 11/29/2005 1:04:45 PM PST by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BostonianRightist

If it were me and my husband was making good money, I wouldn't work as a receptionist.

AND I'd show my boobs at the ballet patron party, the symphony opening night, the museum ribbon cutting ceremony.

Not the office.


45 posted on 11/29/2005 1:05:16 PM PST by peacebaby (I'm not overwhelmed! I'm just the right amount of whelmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Michael Goldsberry
Did you say "Hooters"?
46 posted on 11/29/2005 1:06:16 PM PST by EX52D ((NO! It isn't a bra size!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Peepster

I don't know...what does a receptionist make - $25,000? All the better to make my - uh - point(s).


47 posted on 11/29/2005 1:06:24 PM PST by peacebaby (I'm not overwhelmed! I'm just the right amount of whelmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EX52D

That

was

evil.


48 posted on 11/29/2005 1:07:36 PM PST by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance
Nowadays, a 5-10 second oogle the the old wow wow's and you are written up on harassment charges.

Nonsense. This doesn't happen anywhere near as often as legend would have it - and when it does it's usually because the Company Creep made the mistake of leering at the Company Psycho.

49 posted on 11/29/2005 1:08:00 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When government does too much, nobody else does much of anything." -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Millee

As much as I like the tight skirt, the business blazer does it for me too.

And it's been my experience that women care more about what other women are wearing than men.


50 posted on 11/29/2005 1:08:09 PM PST by BostonianRightist ("Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue." ~ Senator Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10
So this isn't appropriate to wear to work?


51 posted on 11/29/2005 1:08:11 PM PST by Peepster (Saying that guns kill people is like saying spoons make Michael Moore fat!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves; Fierce Allegiance

Most men think "harrass" is two words anyway...


52 posted on 11/29/2005 1:09:17 PM PST by Peepster (Saying that guns kill people is like saying spoons make Michael Moore fat!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Peepster

Well, it would be appropriate at my company......

If I actually had my own company. :-)


53 posted on 11/29/2005 1:10:01 PM PST by day10 (Wherever you come near the human race there's layers and layers of nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Michael Goldsberry
Bounce
54 posted on 11/29/2005 1:10:38 PM PST by EX52D ((NO! It isn't a bra size!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Millee

How the viewers were selected might tell us more about Professor Glick than the rest of the study would tell us about anything.


55 posted on 11/29/2005 1:12:18 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10
I think this study may be right... the one on the right definitely looks smarter...


56 posted on 11/29/2005 1:13:33 PM PST by r-q-tek86 (My mind works like lightning. One brilliant flash and it is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EX52D; smith288; WhiteGuy; najida; PaulaB

Short sleeved blazer, mid-cut blouse, hair in an up-do and classic make-up. Do try this look for work!

57 posted on 11/29/2005 1:16:12 PM PST by LongElegantLegs (Yarn-ho.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Millee
Study: Sexy Attire Works Against Businesswomen

Oh, has a new issue of the scientific journal Duh come out?

SD

58 posted on 11/29/2005 1:17:04 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee

I am so glad I'm in the profession,
the town and the facility I work in.

I feel very lucky now.


59 posted on 11/29/2005 1:17:15 PM PST by najida (Blood on the floor....a Thanksgiving Tradition at my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongElegantLegs
ewww I don't think I would hire him

but I'm weird that way
60 posted on 11/29/2005 1:17:37 PM PST by PaulaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson