Posted on 11/23/2005 6:22:23 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
A South Garland High School teacher and student were caught in a compromising position in a car that put the teacher behind bars Wednesday.
Lindsey Holt, 23, faces two to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000 after police said they found her and the student in a car parked in a Garland park.
The teacher was released from the Garland Detention Center on a $5,000 bond.
Police charged Holt with having an improper relationship with a student, which according to state law involves sexual contact.
However, police have not charged her with sexual assault because the student was 17 and is officially an adult, but they said what happened at the Garland park was criminal.
The police have not released details, but said police officers doing routine patrols in the park came across the two in the car.
"They came across the vehicle, which for some reason raised their suspicion, walked up to it and that was when they saw the teacher and student in a compromising position," said Joe Harn, Garland Police Department.
The park is down the road from the South Garland High School where Holt is a first-year home education teacher.
"You're supposed to be teaching the kids and instead you are teaching them the birds and the bees and everything," said Chris Harnd, a former South Garland High School student. "That is not how it is supposed to go. Your supposed to be teaching home-ed and that is it."
Many students at the school described Holt as a popular teacher at the school.
"She was just a cool teacher," said Nathias Slaughter, Garland student. "I never thought anything. I never would have thought she would have an affair with a student from the school or anything like that."
Holt will not return to the classroom she has been placed on paid leave until the outcome of the investigation.
Police are still looking into what kind of relationship the student and teacher had, and more charges are possible against the teacher.
The steamed up windows were the first clue.
Yeah, I noticed that the sex of the student was NEVER mentioned.
Home Education?
This is how you spread ....the butter?
This is how you choose your lifestyle?
This is how you store and preserve cucumbers and carrots?
this is how you choose your orientation?
filed work, of course, meet me in the park at 8 pm. I will be driving my suburu wagon with a mattress in the back?
This whole thing is sick. When will schools start vetting their Teachers more carefully?
Nothing like using the gullible students for your own personal sex farm....Students whose sexual identity is not yet solidified or formed. Just give them a push in the direction you want them to go? Imprint them into your lifestyle through giving sexual pleasure? Whats an orgasm or two among teachers and students to show them the proper way of achieving true ( mine) sexuality.
Makes one want to puke!
Thank you, Mr. Hand.
I was out of the house and living on my own by 18. Consequently I was making my own decisions about what I was going to do and where I would be living when I was still 17. I guess is you raise your kids to be immature they will never grow up even if they are 30. If you raise them to be responsible, then 17 is not too young. After all, 17 is only one year away from being able to serve in the military, which is certainly an adult decision to make at 17.
Let's take your male teacher. Goes after the 14, 15, 16 yera old girl. That is a crime socially. There was a time when a 14, 15, 16 year old could get married to who ever she wanted. Take Loretta Lynn for example. I for one have a problem with it, and condemn it mainly because I have two little girls growing up. But when it happens the other way, the male student(victim) who is not generally a nerd, or outcast type. They are generally high 5's to 6 feet plus, and are fully developed(as in stud race horse) these sexually deprived female teachers are going for it. Which, I do not have a problem with AT THE LEVEL I DO THE OTHER WAY AROUND(wanted to shout over he sudden blast from the crowd...). The chances are slim that these female teachers are "popping cherries" of these young men.
Now, from a social/moral stanpoint in today's spectra, I see the 'cons' point of view. But I also remember quite clearly my highschool daze and what my pocket phone book looked like(putting it mildly). When you're a 14, 15, 16 year old high school boy, you got two things on your mind...cars and girls...well, a normal boy anyway.
My wife just chewed me out after reading over my shoulder..."What would you do if Jake(my son) was caught with his teacher?..." I want all the details!
So, I guess I'm wrong... But I do understand why there is a double standard and that is because believe it or not, some folks think as I do out there in the judicial system. And it would be my bet(can you start a sentence with "and"??) that the only reason these female teachers are recieving anything more than being fired is exactly because the judicial system does not want to appear biased...(donned the flame resistant suit, waiting the flames ...)
In this case it is just about the bees
I got three babies at the house. 3 6 and 9. We rented shrek 2 when it came out, and I shut it off when the scene of the drag queen bartender appeared...I was ready to go on a nut let me tell ya... I am waiting for someone to snap one day and go... I may be having a bad day at the time and say 'A...what the hell', and go take hie six...
To answer your question: yes.
And the other half are homo as well.
hie = his...
lol...
Uhhh, nowhere in this little clip does it say "he". The local news showed a live interview with the investigator. He (the investigator) specifically stated "She was in her classroom".
I have two little girls growing up.
What would you do if your daughter was caught? The details might prove a tad embarassing next Sunday.
A really harsh "buzz".
This was an offense in spite of the fact that student is a 17 year old adult.
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/PE/content/htm/pe.005.00.000021.00.htm
§ 21.12. IMPROPER RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EDUCATOR AND
STUDENT. (a) An employee of a public or private primary or
secondary school commits an offense if the employee engages in
sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual intercourse
with a person who is enrolled in a public or private primary or
secondary school at which the employee works and who is not the
employee's spouse.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the second
degree.
(c) If conduct constituting an offense under this section
also constitutes an offense under another section of this code, the
actor may be prosecuted under either section or both sections.
Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 224, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
What would you do if your daughter was caught? The details might prove a tad embarassing next Sunday.
Ummmmm... I don't get it. My daughters would never be with a carpet muncher...ummmm... ...lesbian, so what do I have to be embarrassed about??
Interesting how consistently we can uncover facts by what the media reliably refuses to say.
Still, it's better than the other gut instinct of the MSM, which would be to hold these women up as victims of societal mores, as with Kommie Couric and Andrea Yates.
No wait. That'll still happen.
I really apologise. I did not intend to unload a magazine on you. I had posted an earlier thread on this that got moved to chat, and the common assumption was "boys will be boys". Once again, I did not intend to demean you.
But it was voiced by Larry King!
I take it the humor wasn't enough to overcome the appropriateness? Of course, I don't think Shrek 2 was rated G..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.