Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shep Smith: Miers True Conservative But Right Wanted Nominee Who Would Poke Left in Eye
Fox News | governsleastgovernsbest

Posted on 10/27/2005 12:39:29 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

Can we agree?: Shep Smith is preening ignoramus.

Smith just concluded an interview of Juan Williams by offering up the following pet theory:

"When President Bush nominated Miers, he did so with a big wink and let conservatives know she was 'one of us.' But even though conservatives knew that, they rejected her, because she was not sufficiently in-your-face as a pick, and they wanted to poke liberals in the eye with a nominee."

Has Smith been following the debate that has raged in conservative circles over Miers? Is he aware of the serious doubts that arose as to the bona fides of her conservatism? Did he read her speech that became public yesterday in which she expressed support for "self-determination" on abortion?

For Smith to suggest that conservatives rejected Miers despite being confident of her conservatism just because they wanted to inflict more pain on liberals with a more 'offensive' nominee is idiocy parading as theory.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: foxbots; foxnews; juanwilliams; miers; shepsmith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: pollyannaish
Sometimes, the truth hurts. (I don't know if the part about Miers is true, but I do think the Poke in the eye is true.)

I can say, as someone who was opposed to Miers from day one, that it had nothing to do with wanting to poke liberals in the eye. I simply doubted her conservative and intellectual credentials.

41 posted on 10/27/2005 12:50:45 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: al baby

42 posted on 10/27/2005 12:50:49 PM PDT by McGruff (Go ahead, vent your anger. You'll feel better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Poke in the eye works for me!

LOL!


43 posted on 10/27/2005 12:51:10 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I'm not sure I see the correlation between Smith's possible homosexuality and the idiocy of the theory he offered here.

The theory is gay.

44 posted on 10/27/2005 12:52:34 PM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Shep has always been a social liberal. His coverage on the Terri Schiavo case proved to me just where he stands on issues pertaining to innocent human life. He expressed a cruel giddiness about the whole thing, and I kept waiting for him to say something like "when is the worthless piece of crap going to die"? I kid you not....his demeanor smacked of sarcasm and thoughtlessness. He's the same way on abortion. Just listen to him today, firing off rounds left and right against conservatives. What Ailes sees in him I'll never know.


45 posted on 10/27/2005 12:52:41 PM PDT by fox0566
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I started not liking him when he covered Katrina


46 posted on 10/27/2005 12:52:46 PM PDT by LittleMoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Why would anyone believe as fact something some pissed off gay reporter wrote in some stupid gay piece of paper?

So that makes it true??? Are you kidding me?

God, it drives me CRAZY when people, especially smart conservatives, accept rumor, supposition, and innuendo as fact.

47 posted on 10/27/2005 12:53:31 PM PDT by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Poke in the eye works for me!

Are you saying that you were satisfied with Miers' conservative bona fides, but opposed her because her nomination was insufficiently offensive to the Dems?

As a veteran of many of the Miers threads here, I never saw anyone advance that opinion.

Yes, some people said "bring on fight with the Dems." But at the same time these were people who were unsure of Miers conservatism/credentials.

48 posted on 10/27/2005 12:53:37 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

49 posted on 10/27/2005 12:53:53 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
she was not sufficiently in-your-face as a pick, and they wanted to poke liberals in the eye with a nominee

I said the same thing several times here on FR.

50 posted on 10/27/2005 12:54:15 PM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Good. Then you opposed her on the right grounds. I think there were very legitimate concerns. However, I can certainly understand how someone could take away the impression that the right wanted a fight and that fight was turned on the President instead.

(I have to say I hate this whole thing. I am here defending Shepherd Smith for crying out loud, and I am NO fan of his. His Katrina coverage was beyond the pale.)


51 posted on 10/27/2005 12:54:33 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: fox0566

I almost never watched the guy because he always gave me bad vibes. Much too often he made the story about himself, the hallmark of bad journalism. But I have tuned in today because of the importance of following the SC coverage. The guy is truly awful. It's all about him.


52 posted on 10/27/2005 12:55:06 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (read my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
Agree completely.

Strangely enough many here seem eager to believe the gossip in some homo magazine.

53 posted on 10/27/2005 12:57:56 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Maybe Shep didn't like her dress.............

ROFLMAO

Has he confirmed his side of the plate?

54 posted on 10/27/2005 12:58:39 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
So Shep's been outed.

Has a Harrietbot.

55 posted on 10/27/2005 12:58:43 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I sorta agree with Shep. I believe that conservatives were truly looking for a bloodbath nomination process with an all out war and the defeat of the liberals at the end of the day putting the conservative nominee on the bench.

Who disagrees and why?

56 posted on 10/27/2005 12:59:18 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
Agree...

A strong conservative will not get votes from Snow, Collins and Chaffee... Dems only need to get three additional R that want to play to the moderates vice the conservatives (McCain, Specter, Dewine) and the "Fight" could be lost...

Something to think about. And how does bush go about doing it???
57 posted on 10/27/2005 12:59:30 PM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

It has gotten embarrassing for FR the way that threads are highjacked to promote hatred of follow human beings. This thread that you posted had nothing to do with Shep's life style, true or not. I am no great fan of Shep but I would be embarrassed for him to see this thread. FR sure has changed.


58 posted on 10/27/2005 1:01:25 PM PDT by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Shep is way too transparent in his news broadcasts. His childish offhand comments and goofy facial expressions distract from what should be a serious and professional delivery of the news. He has this element of satire that runs throughout much of his broadcast, and instead of simply hearing the daily news, the viewer is constantly reminded of Shep and how HE feels about a particular story. I like Rick Folbaum much better and wish he'd replace Shep permanently.


59 posted on 10/27/2005 1:03:15 PM PDT by fox0566
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pollyannaish
You bet it was all about sticking it to the opposition.

That has never been the President's attitude and I hope it never does come to that.

If you read the posts on this thread you would swear you were at DU.

Pretty sad here today.

60 posted on 10/27/2005 1:04:17 PM PDT by OldFriend (G-D IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson