Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spears: Creators of Warfare? Spears Spawned Ancient Group Violence?
Discovery News ^ | August 25, 2005 | Jennifer Viegas

Posted on 09/06/2005 9:15:30 AM PDT by SunkenCiv

According to Raymond Kelly, who formulated the theory, there at least was a period without a lot of group violence from 1 million to 14,000 years ago, when the overall population was lower and groups were less rigidly structured... Spears empowered defenders because people who initiated violence were more likely to be killed than those they attacked. Kelly suggested it was better to be hiding in a bush or a foxhole with a spear than was to be running toward the foxhole or bush with a spear.

(Excerpt) Read more at dsc.discovery.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: history
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Another "taxpayer-supported unsubstantiated B.S." topic.

FR Lexicon·Posting Guidelines·Excerpt, or Link only?·Ultimate Sidebar Management·Headlines
Donate Here By Secure Server·Eating our own -- Time to make a new start in Free Republic
PDF to HTML translation·Translation page·Wayback Machine·My Links·FreeMail Me
Gods, Graves, Glyphs topic·and group·Books, Magazines, Movies, Music


1 posted on 09/06/2005 9:15:33 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
"Not bloody likely!" -- Jerry Seinfeld

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

2 posted on 09/06/2005 9:17:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Imagine there's no spear
It's easy if you try
No pointy sharp thing
No long and wooden pole
3 posted on 09/06/2005 9:19:03 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Kelly ought to reread Xenophon's Persian Expedition. Lots of spears. Defenders with spears don't have much chance against Greeks with a plan.


4 posted on 09/06/2005 9:23:11 AM PDT by RightWhale (56 degrees, overcast and birdshot, Fairbanks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I don't know about ancient group violence, but she
currently generates a lot of disgust in general...


5 posted on 09/06/2005 9:24:58 AM PDT by mikrofon (One More Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

LOL! exactly


6 posted on 09/06/2005 9:29:48 AM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I have a joke I play on people at times. Someone will posit a question or muse about something and I advance what I call my "plausible theory" (which is a bunch of baloney). It's pretty easy to mess with people who want to believe something in particular.


7 posted on 09/06/2005 9:34:18 AM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
1,000,000 years ago, spears we most likely used as defense against predators by pre-human scavengers who followed herds. 150,000 years ago, spears were used by modern beachcomber humans to fish. 50,000 years ago, inland humans were hunting mammoths and other large animals. Organized civilization is a rather late (10,000 years ago), development that was related to cultivation and domestication. In that context, spears would have been first used as defense and much later as attack by organized armies.

I believe this article is mostly right to the degree that in sparsely populated times, there probably wasn't much inter-tribal warfare until cultivation led to civilization and subsequent population growth. After that time the haves and have-nots had a problem.

8 posted on 09/06/2005 10:16:59 AM PDT by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Yeah, the scenario by this "researcher" sounds like the product of an agenda, so the "study" appears to be another where the conclusion fits the underlying assumptions.


9 posted on 09/06/2005 10:27:55 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster

War Before Civilization War Before Civilization
by Lawrence H. Keeley


10 posted on 09/06/2005 10:29:07 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

What if they attck us with pointed sticks?


11 posted on 09/06/2005 10:32:31 AM PDT by NormB (Yes, but watch your cookies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
In that context, spears would have been first used as defense and much later as attack by organized armies.

A single spearman isn't very useful. A mutually-supporting group of spear-carrying men is far more useful in defense or attack.

12 posted on 09/06/2005 10:51:39 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormB

Ask the deceased Mister Apricot.


13 posted on 09/06/2005 10:52:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: visualops

You and Ray Kelly. ;')


14 posted on 09/06/2005 10:53:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Before any of this comes the development of the pack concept - e.g. the understanding of the safety in numbers when fighting, and the value of hunting as as group.

Until that point, there were no groups to fight each other. It was strictly mano-a-mano (or, for the evolutionists here chimpo-a-chimpo).

Before the group concept took hold the size of a group that could live together was limited. A group working together can hunt/grow much more food.

I'd guess that spears were the third or fourth step in the weapons race.

The rock or stick come first, developing into the club.

Next comes the pointy stick, developing into the knife.

Then comes the LONG pointy stick, developing into the long pointy stick with a knife on it.

15 posted on 09/06/2005 11:28:02 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI

One of the friendly tribes encountered by Xenophon on the return trip used spears with small iron points on one end and a knob on the other end. They also had iron battleaxes hanging on their belts. Not much armor. They fought with more enthusiasm than skill, so the Greeks let them go in first to give the enemy a false sense of security.


16 posted on 09/06/2005 11:42:39 AM PDT by RightWhale (We in heep dip trubble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Brilliant.


17 posted on 09/06/2005 11:44:06 AM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("Casey was proud to be a soldier." Patrick Sheehan, Army Spc. Casey Sheehan's father)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster; lOKKI

"Organized civilization is a rather late (10,000 years ago), development that was related to cultivation and domestication." -- shuckmaster

The 14,000 year figure probably (wild guess) came from the multirow barley sample of that RC date, which was dug up in the Middle East somewhere. Multirow barley means irrigation and domestication.

My view is, cultural development isn't either linear or uniform. Some develop stuff in nice, logical, Victorian-model stages, others don't, and still others find "illogical" leaps to be better.


18 posted on 09/06/2005 11:45:31 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Considering that chimpanzee males roam around in packs, are territorial, and sometimes beat to death and tear to pieces, with fists, nails and teeth, other chimps they encounter on the way (and sometimes they don't), I'd say it's not a safe bet to try and find human agression emerging because of some technology.

I suppose that if you taught one band of chimps down there in Africa to pick up big sticks and beat their opponents when running around out there in packs, they would do so, and their young might learn from them too. This would be considerably worse than teaching kids to smoke.


19 posted on 09/06/2005 12:16:46 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI
Until that point, there were no groups to fight each other. It was strictly mano-a-mano (or, for the evolutionists here chimpo-a-chimpo).

Ever see how chimps will cooperate to isolate & kill a monkey? Cooperative hunting techniques pre-dated human beings (or is not exclusive to human beings depending on your stance on evolution).

BTW, I agree with all you other points.

20 posted on 09/06/2005 12:39:14 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson