Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Drunks and their privacy rights.

Another case for SCOTUS!?

1 posted on 07/08/2005 10:18:08 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cyborg; Xenalyte; raivyn; MamaTexan; Jersey Republican Biker Chick; njwoman; arasina; ...

Interesting information - or just a Silly Friday Thread.


2 posted on 07/08/2005 10:23:08 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (I can resist everything except temptation. -- Oscar Wilde.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher
Eric Laverriere was celebrating last New Year's Eve at a friend's house in Waltham when police broke up the party.

I think "why the police broke up the party" would be a fact I would want to include, were I a journalist. The disposition of the partygoers would depend on this fact very much.

SD

3 posted on 07/08/2005 10:24:53 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher
If anyone is interested...I did check Texas Laws regarding this and here is where we stand:

1.It is illegal to take more than three sips of beer at a time while standing.
2.The entire Encyclopedia Britannica is banned in Texas because it contains a recipe for making beer that can be used at home.
3.In Houston, Texas, beer many not be purchased after midnight on Sunday, but can be purchased anytime on Monday...which happens to begin right after midnight on Sunday! So it's illegal to buy it when its legal to buy it?
4.One needs permission from the director of parks and recreation before getting drunk in any city park.
5.It is illegal to milk another person's cow.

The last one is for anyone that gets so trashed that they wonder on to another's farm....

6 posted on 07/08/2005 10:27:18 AM PDT by PaulaB (I'd say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher
''That's the beauty of the land of the free."

Free? We haven't been "FREE" in a long time.

This guy is only 25 years old, he doesn't know what freedoms have been lost in the last few years alone.


26 posted on 07/08/2005 10:43:55 AM PDT by unixfox (AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher

This time next week I fully intend to be practicing my rights with a pitcher (or 2) of Margaritas.

If I pass out in the front yard and wake up with fire ant bites, that's my problem ;)


37 posted on 07/08/2005 10:50:38 AM PDT by najida (The hardest person to forgive is yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher

I think the police had no business arresting him.


38 posted on 07/08/2005 10:51:33 AM PDT by Perdogg (Perdogg - Team Pontiac (as long as my insurance company says so))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher
he has a constitutional right to get drunk on private property ''so long as he causes no public disturbance."

Somebody called the cops. That means they were loud, and noise crossing the property line is trespass. Being on somebody else's private property without permission is worth some attention. Also, there is no such thing as private property; that is a myth. Being drunk is also damaging State property.

72 posted on 07/08/2005 11:19:24 AM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher
Laverriere asserts in his lawsuit that he had "a constitutional right to be drunk in private..."

D@mn straight (hiccup...barf).

79 posted on 07/08/2005 12:14:54 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher

I can remember parties that were not considered good unless the cops came. They were always polite, checked everything out and left with admonitions to tone it down.

They couldn't arrest but they could admonish.

H Square on 103 Chamberlain Street ...... gone but not forgotten


157 posted on 07/08/2005 2:19:54 PM PDT by bert ( "Market forces, not political majorities, will compel societies to reconfigure themselves in ways t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher

Someone was throwing BEER BOTTLES at the police cruisers and there was a guy drunk on premisis drinking beers who was the owner.

I see where there is an issue regarding the thrown beer bottles.


178 posted on 07/08/2005 3:26:51 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher

The law, which does not explicitly say whether it applies to those in public or in private, authorizes police to take incapacitated people to their homes, a treatment facility, or a police station, where they can be held against their will for up to 12 hours.


Pretty extreme if you ask me, so if they take you to your
home, how do they hold you against your will for 12 hours?


193 posted on 07/08/2005 7:21:09 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson