Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Reviews Are In: "The Honeymooners" Film Is Junk
Internet Movie Database Report ^ | 6-9-05

Posted on 06/10/2005 2:27:42 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache

Reviews: 'The Honeymooners' Just Junk

June 9,2005

Both critics who love the updated movie version of the classic Jackie Gleason series The Honeymooners and those who hate it (and there are far more of the latter than the former) agree that the movie has little in common with the TV show.

"Change may be good for the characters, but not necessarily for the audience," writes A.O. Scott in the New York Times. And it's not just that the movie has an all-black cast, headed by Cedric the Entertainer. "Badly paced and leadenly scripted, with jokes that only register because characters pause for the expected laughter (almost nonexistent at the screening I attended), The Honeymooners is one of the biggest disappointments of this still-young movie year," writes Chris Kaltenback in the Baltimore Sun.

"The Honeymooners doesn't work because of an extremely lame script attributed to four writers, which takes a concept that would barely have supported one of the original 'Classic 39' episodes and stretches it to a 90-minute feature that ... feels at least twice as long," comments Lou Lumenick in the New York Post.

Glenn Whipp in the Los Angeles Daily News doesn't mince words. "This new version of The Honeymooners stinks," he writes. "There is no reason for it to exist other than cashing in on a brand name." Wesley Morris of the Boston Globe, one of a handful of black film critics, begins his review by remarking, "An uncle of mine used to joke that he'd know racial parity had been achieved in Hollywood when black people started making movies as bad as white people's. I always thought his joke aimed too low. But according to his logic, the predominantly black update of The Honeymooners would be an achievement. It's not as bad as the average Hollywood movie, it's stupendously worse."

However, Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times calls it a "surprise and a delight, a movie that escapes the fate of weary TV retreads and creates characters that remember the originals, yes, but also stand on their own." Lowe Returning


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: moviereview; thehoneymooners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 06/10/2005 2:27:42 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
I like Roger Ebert (Ya I know he is a liberal but the guy knows his movies and I generally agree with him on his reviews) but he always seems to go "easy" on movies that feature a predominately Black cast.

PS. Who couldn't have guessed that this film was going suck?? I mean come on.
2 posted on 06/10/2005 2:30:13 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Roger Ebert just wants to see his name on movie posters next to mr. Jeffery Lyons.


3 posted on 06/10/2005 2:31:40 PM PDT by james500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
"The 'Honeymooners' Film Is Junk"

No way!

"A glass eye in a duck's ass could see that."

- David Bowie
4 posted on 06/10/2005 2:32:59 PM PDT by jdm ("Gag me with an oil-for-food voucher." - governsleastgovernsbest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston
Who couldn't have guessed that this film was going suck??

That was going to be my post.

5 posted on 06/10/2005 2:33:08 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Our local critics also panned this film.

This business of recycling old movies and tv shows -- sorry, but I liked the originals (maybe) -- have no interest in seeing something like this rehashed again. And some of the originals weren't that good either to begin with.


6 posted on 06/10/2005 2:34:21 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Ebert is an almost infallible reviewer. If he says it's good it's almost certainly not and vice-versa.


7 posted on 06/10/2005 2:35:19 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

I think that's true of most critics. :)


8 posted on 06/10/2005 2:38:58 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
However, Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times calls it a "surprise and a delight

Ebert would stoop over and kiss his own bee-hind if he thought it was the "politically correct" thing to do.

Ebert's one of the biggest phonies the liberals have ever produced.

I'm not surprised at all that this movie is a stinker.

One of my favorite movie review sites.

Rotten tomatoes.com

9 posted on 06/10/2005 2:45:40 PM PDT by Bullish (Proudly and consistently hating the Clinton's since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Ebert's liberalism is the worst thing he could have ever come out of the closet with.It taints every single review he does.


10 posted on 06/10/2005 2:58:52 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache ("Scientology is dangerous stuff,it's like forming a religion based around Johnny Quest and Haji.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston

Believe it or not, Michael Medved liked it.


11 posted on 06/10/2005 3:10:39 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

The idea had potential, but it seems they got too far from the original. It would only work as a self-aware hommage to the Gleason classic.


I was hoping it would be good.


12 posted on 06/10/2005 3:12:50 PM PDT by Petronski (Veni Vidi Venti: I came, I saw, I drank a lottta coffee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

When Siskel was living, I knew I could bank on any film siskel liked and Ebert hated.


13 posted on 06/10/2005 3:14:08 PM PDT by Petronski (Veni Vidi Venti: I came, I saw, I drank a lottta coffee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

IIRC, Ebert is married to a black woman. Perhaps he feels the need to support black films


14 posted on 06/10/2005 3:24:07 PM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Bang zoom straight to the dollar theater, Alice!


15 posted on 06/10/2005 3:40:39 PM PDT by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catbertz

Then I guess that he will LOVE the new version of KOJAK!


16 posted on 06/10/2005 3:42:36 PM PDT by Highest Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: catbertz

Ebert and wife.

17 posted on 06/10/2005 3:47:04 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Wesley Morris of the Boston Globe got it right:
"There is no reason for it to exist other than cashing in on a brand name."
Far too much of this happening these days. Doesn't anyone possess the ability to have an original thought?


18 posted on 06/10/2005 3:48:13 PM PDT by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Some things should never be remade and the Honeymooners is one of them. I will go out of my way to avoid this.


19 posted on 06/10/2005 3:48:16 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Even the cast of "The Original 39" prolly couldn't pull off a 90 minute episode. Sitcoms are meant to be 22 minutes of rapid fire humor. Completely different genre from feature films.

If, as it appears, Hollywood is out of ideas, they can reach me via FreepMail! ;)

20 posted on 06/10/2005 3:48:19 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut (metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson