Posted on 05/10/2005 6:51:23 AM PDT by sarah stone
How does this present administration view dead beat dads? I have received no child support for 26 months, my ex husbnd is a Greek Orthodox Priest who holds a valid Marriage Counselor Licence and Mental Health Therapist.
Then educate her as to the proper role of the fedgov. I told her that in response to her freepmail - that she had my sympathy, but it wasn't the fedgov's responsibility to crack down here.
However, we had people disparaging this person for getting knocked up and wanting the dad to pay - as if she were some single woman who got pregnant from a one-night stand.
Apparently, the fact that this person doesn't understand the concept of federalism (which a majority of Americans do not) gives folks here license to make light of a very difficult personal situation that she's in and question her morals. And then we wonder why our message doesn't have a broader appeal.
She's trying to. But she seems to be at the end of her rope - and she's probably been propagandized by the media so much that she thinks the fedgov can help solve this.
Yeah - I know - she's banned - but only 26 months? Come on - let's talk about dead beat moms. My ex is 60 months plus behind in her child support. And it's only $100 a month.
She's not questioning your fatherhood, but your view of it, and your character.
Which, given the offensive, stupid, atrocious, heartless, clueless, and callous nature of your asinine comments on this issue to date, is understandable.
Dan
You have a point - there were a few who couldn't read the misspelled word "husbnd" as "husband", and thought it meant "casual contact".
This person also does not seem to understand that for immediate relief she has to work with existing laws and charities. New laws are a long-term solution, federalism or not.
or fathers who resent paying their ex child support - seen a lot of that too.
Huh?
This person also does not seem to understand that for immediate relief she has to work with existing laws and charities.
Finally you see the point of her post. She didn't understand so she turned to a group of people to find out what to do. Instead she was viciously attacked and banned from FR. If we ban everyone who doesn't understand something, nobody would be left on FR.
I've seen too many who wanna take the kids, so they won't have to put a single red cent into the hands of their "greedy" ex. Anything you can say about fathers, can also be said about mothers. Statistically, non-custodial mothers are the worst payers.
If you think we are to quick to zot people, then you obviously don't see the huge amount of troll meat that gets paved every day.
You mean like these?
So what's your point? You got knocked up, dad skipped out, have a nice life.
13 posted on 05/10/2005 9:54:20 AM EDT by Pondman88 [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you for real ? How about some personal responsibility here ? Get a job.
14 posted on 05/10/2005 9:55:08 AM EDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
- which she refused to answer.
If I were fairly new and got treated like that, I'd probably refuse to answer as well.
How hard is it to stay on your own thread and help explain your situation to a group of people who really would help?
That really gave her the impression that we wanted to help her.
If you think we are to quick to zot people, then you obviously don't see the huge amount of troll meat that gets paved every day.
I've smoked out hundreds of trolls. But I check their posting history and try and gauge their sincerity. A few folks instead just ripped into her.
Grammar, spelling etc. They're all important.
I give you props for defending her, but what FR are you on?
Come on, it's a stupid post--she's allegedly married to a marriage counselor and doesn't know about child support????
And he's a minister to boot???? And it's Bush's fault????
Plus, she got alot of good advice, if it is a real post.
And your response was crass and uncivil.
And it's Bush's fault????
Please show where she said that. She asked what the admin's position was on the subject.
We need to chill a bit on the zot urges.
Maybe trying to learn? Not everyone is as thick-headed and thick-skinned as I am.
Wouldn' YOU expect those types of responses to an ill-written vanity thread? Grammar, spelling etc. They're all important.
Ah, so that justifies haranging her for getting knocked up by her husband, of all people.
I give you props for defending her, but what FR are you on?
One that seems a bit coarser recently.
You people have been nasty since way back! ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.