Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should pornography be illegal?
Feb 28th 2005 | Me

Posted on 02/28/2005 5:53:06 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell

Prostitution: one adult pays another adult for sex- is illegal

Pornography: Where one adult pays two adults to have sex and brings a camera, This is legal.

Pornography has been around for over one hundred years, since the time of the camera,

but it has only been the last few decades where it became the money making industry that it is today. And today's pornography is much much worse.

This question came to me after reading this article

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353029/posts

an excerpt "The Justice Department is appealing the dismissal of an obscenity case in Pittsburgh in which a federal judge said prosecutors went too far in trying to block the sale of pornographic movies over the Internet and through the mail. The case initially was prosecuted under Ashcroft""

Should pornography be illegal?

It's an opinion question, you answer, give your reasons. Is it free speech or not? Why. And where is the line drawn? Has pornography promoted homosexuality and unsafe sex? Or is it a privacy issue?

Should there be standards on pornography?

Concerned Women for America say No- what do you think?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: 18yroldauthority; opinion; pornography; sheknowsherporn; voiceofachild
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-312 next last
To: A CA Guy
No, just read them and keep them insignificant as possible.

What, your posts? Not sure what I could possible do that you haven't done already.

121 posted on 02/28/2005 7:28:22 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
FALSE, if you drink excessivly while home ALONE as the guardian of a minor in your custody, you could go to jail and lose parental rights if you are drunk often enough while caring for kids IMO.

Drinking heavily and/or being a drunk is not illegal, neglecting or putting your kids in danger is.

122 posted on 02/28/2005 7:28:45 PM PST by Modernman ("Normally, I don't listen to women, or doctors." - Captain Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: FactsMatter
No, I won't commit to a ban on cigarettes, beer or spirits.
BTW...the type of bans I earlier alluded to were like the one on smoking in NYC bars and restaurants and the dry counties in different states.
123 posted on 02/28/2005 7:29:28 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
we had social conservatives and liberatarians.

At least we'd have someone to hold responsible for the New Deal.

124 posted on 02/28/2005 7:32:09 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Well, what conservatives need to keep in mind here concerning Libertarians at voting time is that they are the ones here that like to try and split our vote.

This favors Democrats in actuality, so as Libertarians get people to waste their vote on go-no-where anarchist third parties, they are in fact passive enablers of the Democrat party as I see it.

125 posted on 02/28/2005 7:34:00 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I understand what your saying, but there are a few folks from whom my monitor's photons have asked to be mercifully spared.


126 posted on 02/28/2005 7:34:21 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Right, but when you are home alone and get drunk, your drunkenness is illegal regarding children in the house. Your intoxication is illegal in regards to endangering your child.

You may NOT be intoxicated unless you have another sober adult caring for the children.
127 posted on 02/28/2005 7:36:29 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

you're
128 posted on 02/28/2005 7:36:47 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Well, what conservatives need to keep in mind here concerning Libertarians at voting time is that they are the ones here that like to try and split our vote.

God, I'm glad we've got you to tell us what to think about, and not think about. It's so much better that way.

129 posted on 02/28/2005 7:36:54 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
Concerned Women for America say No

Are you sure? I would think they would say yes.

130 posted on 02/28/2005 7:38:22 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Lurkers can just hang till the next election and witness this circus among Libertarians themselves.
The most gross part are when those that voted for Democrats speak of it here on FR.
That happened a couple of elections ago and kind of made me sick.


131 posted on 02/28/2005 7:38:53 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Just as it is for anyone in leadership, Americans must face the fact that self-destructive morality should not be regulated. We must have the courage to let the damned be damned.


132 posted on 02/28/2005 7:39:03 PM PST by fishing1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; LauraleeBraswell

If the gov't is regulating prostitution, they will be getting money from it. Once they start getting money from something, they start promoting it. they are in that business.


133 posted on 02/28/2005 7:40:16 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Tha would make for interesting TV to say the least.

If I remember correctly, C-SPan doesn't do local politics, only Fed one. IF the people want to out law porn in a certain state, they cand do so. And elected officials will run on whether t outlaw it and if yes what constitutes porn.

As another FRpr points out, a lot of ppl like porn, so a total outlaw is probably not possible. We can, however, encourage a culture of morality, where porn will be rejcected without any need for laws.


134 posted on 02/28/2005 7:41:58 PM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Lurkers can just hang till the next election and witness this circus among Libertarians themselves. The most gross part are when those that voted for Democrats speak of it here on FR. That happened a couple of elections ago and kind of made me sick.

You better stick around. They'll need someone to obfuscate the difference between libertarians and Libertarians for them.

135 posted on 02/28/2005 7:42:32 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: SwankyC

ROFL. And the answer is A.

The tip of is me giggling and this smily :9


136 posted on 02/28/2005 7:43:54 PM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FactsMatter

It's up to the ppl. It's unlikely all 50 states will have an anti-porn referendum, but it is possible to bring our culture back to a more moral time where no laws are necessary and porn is driven back into the underground it belong.


137 posted on 02/28/2005 7:45:58 PM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Killborn

Why?


138 posted on 02/28/2005 7:49:53 PM PST by FactsMatter (:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: fishing1

There have been anti-obscenity laws since colonial times and our FFs didn't change them.If anything,they made them stronger;as did the individual states.


139 posted on 02/28/2005 8:02:49 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: FactsMatter

A large number of ppl like pron. Others see it as free speech. It can also be seen as an anti-business legislation. Because we are a free and capitalist society we simply can't tell the pronmongeers goodbbye and force ppl to behave. IMO< leaving it to the states is the best idea. But forget about legislation. All we need is enough ppl saying no to pron and it will no longer be mainstream.


140 posted on 02/28/2005 8:04:44 PM PST by Killborn (It's called C4. Use lots and lots of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-312 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson