Is the US really interesting in winning Iraq?

My own | 02-10-05 | Del Rio Wildcat 2

[SolidRedState]

Interesting, very interesting.

[Dashing Dasher]

WHY do people feel the need to pontificate?

Do you have news? facts to share? Feel free to share it - but this VANITY cr@p is overrated!

[metesky]

Troll?
Maybe, maybe not.

Lunatic John Bircher?
Definitely.

[MarineBrat]

Hi!

[SlowBoat407]

Oliver's lessons in Troll Spotting - Lesson #4.

Troll post opinion sure to get arguments.

Troll draw much many retorts from devoted FReepers.

Troll post rebuttal feigning shock that we can't discuss things "in an adult manner" (or similar put-down).

Troll taste like ZOT warmed over.

[trisham]

I am not so sure we are deserving of liberty. I have never read such pablum and nonsense in my life.

*****************

MEOW.

[SlowBoat407]

Do I see zot on the horizon?

[MeekOneGOP]

Is the US really interested in winning Iraq?

Well, I thought Troll due to his fantasy BS theory about Bush wanting to start this war with no intention of winning it?

That's John "cut n run" Kerry's mode. Not Bush. Total BS vanity, imho.

[sdpatriot]

good post Yo Yo... does all this uneducated jibber jabber about imortal and endless numbers of special forces remind you of anyone? remember the debates?

i guess some people will believe anything..

[dighton]

Whoa, that's neat.

[MeekOneGOP]

[MEG33]

You may have nailed it.

[metesky]

According to The Bride, that's the first thing I've been right about all week...

[zip]

Given the idiotic (not all of) responses articles which I have just read written, I am not so sure we are deserving of liberty. I have never read such pablum and nonsense in my life.

I heartily agree with the rewritten quote.

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

If our inadequately trained troops beat a path to Baghdad that quick, I would shudder to see what they could do should they be adequately trained.

Oh wait, you're just making up crap. Nevermind.

[MEG33]

;)

[aculeus]

First of all, let me state I am an Americanist patriot.

Second of all, let me state that I am an uninterestedist.

[zip]

Excellent post. Thanks for expressing the thoughts of many of us here.

[zip]

Somehow my first reply to you disappeared into cyberspace so I'll resend it.

Excellent post and I want you to know that you speak for most of us here. Thanks

[Del Rio Wildcat 2]

I don't remember saying that we needed to send such a huge number of special forces. I never mentioned divisions or anything like that. In fact, we don't. But we do need multiple squads of small units, lightly armed, working around the clock with Iraqis trained to do likewise.

This could be done and it's not rocket-science. But the will has to be there. Obviously, with the exception of some more educated commanders, it's not.

It's amazing how individuals try to "read something into" any written piece even when it is not there. Some people like to argue for the sake of arguing. Like the old saying goes, there are those who would argue with a fence post.