Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Common grammar and usage errors
12/22/04 | Self

Posted on 12/22/2004 9:32:13 AM PST by georgiadevildog

I am starting a grammar thread at the behest of Xenalyte and TheMom. Post your most irritating pet peeves of grammar or usage here.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Education; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: allyourbase; aybabtu; bare; barebutt; bear; bearbutt; beesting; but; butt; cheese; computergeeks; geeks; grammar; grammer; grammergeeks; hammer; hi; high; howardhuges; huge; hugh; hughhefner; hughjackman; loose; lose; loss; me; meandmike; mike; mikeandme; mine; moose; moosecheese; saycheese; series; serious; spellinbe; spellingbeehive; stupidvanity; their; there; usage; whatyousay; your; youre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-211 next last
To: georgiadevildog
Y'all = just you

All y'all = everybody

101 posted on 12/22/2004 10:59:06 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog
When people say "I am going to try and go to the store later" instead of "try TO go to the store later". It's not try and, it's try to.
102 posted on 12/22/2004 10:59:31 AM PST by Bella_Bru (You're about as funny as a case sensitive search engine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog
Agreed! See my thread on this exact peeve: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1277447/posts
103 posted on 12/22/2004 11:02:13 AM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

ping!


104 posted on 12/22/2004 11:03:39 AM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: escapefromboston
Don't be so Homophobic.

I believe that should be, "Homophonophobic". :-)

105 posted on 12/22/2004 11:04:17 AM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
...instead of Death is annoying to

Aaaarrgghh! Annoying to... whom?

Did you mean "...is annoying too"? ..as in, "also"?

I'm a hopeless homophonophobic...

106 posted on 12/22/2004 11:06:42 AM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TChris; All

I used to think I was the only one, but now I know I am not alone. Thanks, FReepers. What a relief to know that there are still some people out there who care about grammar!


107 posted on 12/22/2004 11:11:23 AM PST by georgiadevildog (Get to work. You aren't being paid to believe in the power of your dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog
What a relief to know that there are still some people out there who care about grammar!

I care about my grammar. She may have died earlier this year, but I still care about her.

108 posted on 12/22/2004 11:13:22 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks ("Just because you were born stupid doesn't give you any right to be stupid!" - Paul Watson to Makahs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog

Irregardless.


109 posted on 12/22/2004 11:14:08 AM PST by Veritas et equitas ad Votum (If the Constitution "lives and breathes", it dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog

Put me on the list, please? Thanks!


110 posted on 12/22/2004 11:25:03 AM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; georgiadevildog

My daughter was in a spelling bee once where the announcer had a Texas accent AND she had a lisp. That was hard!! (The adults hurt themselves trying not to laugh out loud).


111 posted on 12/22/2004 11:28:54 AM PST by TheMom (Hell yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: munchtipq
The word is listed in the dictionary, but it is listed as "nonstandard," meaning that it is not standard English and is akin to "ain't." It's not really a word. It's just that it has been used so much (incorrectly) that it has come to be accepted.

IMHO, you won your argument.

112 posted on 12/22/2004 11:31:36 AM PST by georgiadevildog (Get to work. You aren't being paid to believe in the power of your dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog
From Right Angles and Other Obstinate Truths

Between you and I, grammar makes me nauseous

One of the advantages of being in the old fogy club is that we’re expected to fulminate against the modern age. Not only is it our right, it’s our responsibility to point out at every opportunity how things have degenerated since we were callow youths.

This week’s rant is about how what used to be termed Standard English has deteriorated. In the second (1962) edition of “The Perrin-Smith Handbook of Current English,” Standard English is defined as “the English that is used by educated people in carrying on the affairs of business, science, literature, government — the effective language of public affairs in general.”

The problem is that today’s educated people aren’t very good at grammar. Years ago I received correspondence from a man identifying himself as a “collage graduate.” He ended his letter by demanding to know “how dam dom do you think I am?” I knew precisely how dam dom he was.

Regularly on TV and radio you hear people, often commentators and politicians, speak of something as “between you and I.” These educated folks apparently were trained to believe that if a phrase sounds artificial and pretentious, it must be good English. Every time I hear “between you and I” alarm bells go off in my head. Not that that’s all bad. It’s a pleasant change from those darn voices usually chattering at me.

“Infer” is now often used interchangeably with “imply.” There once was a considerable difference, with the speaker or writer implying and the listener or reader inferring.

One grammatical blunder particularly turns my stomach. When people claim that someone or something makes them nauseous, I want to soak them with industrial strength Pepto. The perpetrators may well be nauseous, which means disgusting. That has nothing to do, however, with the cause of their discomfort, which made them nauseated.

The battle between “fewer” and “less” has pretty much been decided. As you other fogies may recall, “fewer” applied to numbers while “less” applied to quantity. That’s no longer true, and the change may partially be attributable to advertising. There’s no shortage of tasty snacks that now boast “less calories.” This may be a trend and one day the same items may claim they have “fewer fat.” Then there are the ubiquitous “15 items or less” signs in checkout lanes.

We have folks who appraise their boss of a situation. Apprising would have been just as good. Medicine may affect our concentration, but for others it effects their concentration. Some places accept personal checks while other spots except them.

There must be a place that provides specialized training in grammar to waitresses. I mean waitpersons. Or perhaps servers. Invariably, they’ll approach a table and ask something along the lines of, “Are you guys ready to order?” It makes no difference how many females are in the party. Over and over, the word “guys” is used. Do you think the EEOC would send me some cash for bringing this rampant sexism to its attention?

Sloppy English may be a consequence of the do your own thing, make your own rules, don’t be judgmental mindset of the boomer generation. For decades now, questioning authority has been fashionable. Why be bound by silly old conventions?

Perhaps there’s no need to go to the extent of French Jesuit grammarian Dominique Bouhours. When his death was imminent (or is that eminent?), he said, “I am about to — or I am going to — die; either expression is used.”

On the other hand, individuals are often judged by the way they speak and write. Thomas Mann observed: “Speech is civilization itself.”

By the way (a tiresomely overused expression if I’ve ever heard of one), before readers jump all over me for my own grammatical transgressions, keep in mind that I shouldn’t be too stringently bound by rules of grammar. This is known as artistic license. Please keep the snickering here to a minimum.

Kindly note also that while I abhor poor English, I don’t pretend to be an expert. I ain’t that dom.

113 posted on 12/22/2004 11:32:07 AM PST by Mike Bates (If you've been very, very good, Santa may give you. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog; Eaker
My grammar stinks. That is one of the (many) reasons I keep my husband around.

Word does my Spell Check; Eaker does my Grammar Check.

114 posted on 12/22/2004 11:35:53 AM PST by TheMom (Hell yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

An excellent article. I learned one thing in particular. The nauseous / nauseated debate is now settled in my mind. I have actually been taught the opposite. Maybe a little research is in order. Thanks for the column.


115 posted on 12/22/2004 11:37:03 AM PST by georgiadevildog (Get to work. You aren't being paid to believe in the power of your dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog

I hate "I could of done more." Obviously, it sounds like that, but it is spelled "I could have done more."


Also, when someone says "I could care less," they are conveying exactly the opposite of what they mean. It is "I couldn't care less," as in the amount of my caring is zero, I don't care. But saying "I could care less" means the amount of caring is greater than zero, I do care.


Finally, one must use a space after a comma or period. Sentences like this one,which ignore this rule,make the speaker(or poster)look stupid.Very stupid.


116 posted on 12/22/2004 11:37:34 AM PST by Petronski (A suitable case for treatment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Little known fact: media and data are plural.

These data are misleading. The media are biased.


117 posted on 12/22/2004 11:42:07 AM PST by Petronski (A suitable case for treatment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog; Xenalyte; TheMom
And.

I'm getting tired of seeing sentences that begin with the word "AND".

Read the WSJ sometimes. I think they have a rule to start at least two sentences per article with the word "and".

118 posted on 12/22/2004 11:43:42 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
The battle between “fewer” and “less” has pretty much been decided.

Bull. It's not lost unless we surrender. Fewer refers to items that can be counted, less refers to things which must be measured. Fewer cups of coffee, less coffee.

119 posted on 12/22/2004 11:45:28 AM PST by Petronski (A suitable case for treatment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: georgiadevildog; Xenalyte; dead; Deb
  1. "Impact," used as a verb. A tooth can be impacted. A colon can be impacted. People are not impacted. Brr-r-r-r.
  2. The politically correct use of plural pronoun "their" where a singular pronoun should be used. "Everyone [every one, every single one] should mind their [those guys', plural] business."
  3. "Momentarily" used instead of "in a moment." "We'll be back momentarily" (i.e. just for a moment).
  4. ""All but" used to mean the opposite. "After the race, he was all but exhausted" — which should mean "everything except exhausted,: i.e., NOT exhausted, but meaning "exhausted."
  5. "Literally" used non-literally. "After I read that I was literally torn in pieces." (Unlikely.)
I reserve the right to revise and extend my remarks.

Dan

120 posted on 12/22/2004 11:45:30 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson