Posted on 10/15/2004 3:31:44 PM PDT by funeralcom
While I don't agree with O'Reilly on 1/2 of his talking points, I do believe he is good for "Fair & Balanced" News but if true, everyone has to "Pay the Piper", at some point in their life. Let's pray this isn't true, but the complaint is pretty convincing.
You have the cutest emoticons and gifs! I am so jealous!
I believe Fox and O'Reilly, in their suit, alleged that they were given 'excerpts'.
Well, save them for yourself and use them! They are fun. I always said a picture is worth a thousand words. Here's a few pictures I wish we would see on the media! LOL!
You talked about motive. It goes directly to motive for filing the suit. Besides, the timing is suspicious.
Read the rest of the complaint.
I did. They have nothing for a legal claim. Just a lot of dirt to spread whether true or not.
LOL Especially the last one! I steal them all over the place and use them, too. Yours are cute!
Sorry. I didn't mean to get off topic. But I wanted you to see these pictures of FnKerry, if you haven't already.
He put his hands on you. I said in my previous post if a man touches you, that is assault and of course you have a case. In this o-reilly case, the chick talked to him over and over and over and barely said a peep, didn't tell him if he talks to her innapropriately again she's talking to Fox superiors, didn't tell him off and hang up after the first mention of sexual stuff, went out with him over and over.... would you do that with a guy who demonstrated himself to be a pervert??!!! Neither would I.
Oh, bs. You and the other koolaid drinkers seize on the one article that is going to get tossed if this ever goes to court.
The three (3) phone calls wherein she is claiming he is wanking off while talking to her are secondary, I guess?
The claim on behalf of the plaintiff that he had previously indulged in said activities with other staffers at Fox doesn't matter?
Me too.. especially if he really was using a vibrator on himself. Ultra gross!
Uma is a better and tought interviewer than O'Reilly. He also lost me after he TRASHED the Swifties without knowing a damn thing about them.
I am not making a case on either side for either of them. You stated that sexual harrassment claims were bullshit and I answered your question about my claim.
I think she was a fool to keep taking his calls and there is more here than meets the eye.
of San Diego, who was convicted of heinuous murder before his due process too.. By a Jury of the Inflamed by the Media, Judge O'Reilly presiding.David Westerfield
Trouble is there's no sure evidence Westerfield did it, and plenty of suggestion the young girl's parents or their drug and wife swapping cronies either did it or attracted the beast that did.
I guess Judge O'Reilly found the hypocritical and sexuually liberated swappers to be more *sympatico*. Hear that beat?
I love 'em! I sent them to Mr. Okie! Thanks again!
"I am reserving judgement for the time being about either parties motive".
This was part of their complaint? Wow.
I know there are a lot of FReepers who don't like Bill O'Reilly, but I don't understand why everyone is so quick to assume he's guilty. Personally I find the timing of the allegations suspicious, coming just a day after O'Reilly accused her of a "multimillion dollar shakedown attempt" (not sure what that's all about) and two weeks before the election.
Maybe this woman is trying to tarnish FNC's image in the eyes of the public, maybe her motive is revenge, or maybe she has some other agenda. Or he might really be guilty. Personally, I think O'Reilly is smarter than this, but you never know.
In any case, I'll wait to see how this plays out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.