[bvw]

Well with pre-emptive short-cuttings to the truth like you are engaging in, maybe O'Reilly is getting back just a bit of what he gave

David Westerfield

of San Diego, who was convicted of heinuous murder before his due process too.. By a Jury of the Inflamed by the Media, Judge O'Reilly presiding.

Trouble is there's no sure evidence Westerfield did it, and plenty of suggestion the young girl's parents or their drug and wife swapping cronies either did it or attracted the beast that did.

I guess Judge O'Reilly found the hypocritical and sexuually liberated swappers to be more *sympatico*. Hear that beat?

[Jaded]

Actually, if you read O'Reilly's book, he doesn't seem concerned with facts.

My dislike of O'Reilly is based on his performance after 9/11. IMO, he likes to take the side opposite of his guests no matter what their position, facts be damned.

I don't know that much about the law suit going on. My questions is, is if this went on for so long why didn't she tell him to shut up, or talk to the brass? Why is the very first move with an attorney? OTOH, if there is some documentation that he's been slapped on the hand and continued, then shame on both him and Fox.