Posted on 09/30/2004 8:48:24 PM PDT by itsinthebag
Just heard this on John Bachelor show with Monica Crowley as guest
I like the way you think and I agree 100%.
I think you're off base.
Well put....I just wish he'd been asked some tough questions about his terrible senate record!
I think the media will be spinning a Kerry komback based on his debate performance but the truth is Kerry didn't explain his position on Iraq. He's still stuck in his own mental quagmire!
Well it seems to me that TradeSports and the Iowa Electronic Market are hardly budging. There is certainly no big movement to Kerry awary from Bush among those who are putting hard cash on the line. They seem to have declared it either a tie or as a non-event election-wise.
Not to say that I wouldn't have liked to see a jump in W's numbers but when you are winning you just need to keep on winning and that is what Bush is doing.
after I heard Rudy speak I knew everything was going to be alright....there were no zingers, or ringers....President Bush did ok and thats all he had to do to keep his lead!!
:)
At the end of the day, Kerry's base will be fired up because he won on debate points, but he did very little to win over the hearts of the undecideds. His positions are still murky, and the best thing he has going for him is the "ABB" appeal. We learned nothing from him tonight that we did not know already.
In short, he missed an opportunity as well.
I belive what you are speaking of is the group of 6 "Undecided" voters that they polled after the show.
Included in the list of "undecideds" were traditional Dim voting block people. All of them said domestic issues were more important that what was discussed tonight. If this is what will decide the "undecided" vote, I fear for our nation. A few more bucks in their pocket, a bit lower gas price, saving the money from fighting the war on terror and moving it over to social programs...if these decide the election, I fear we are in for our own version of the Russian school shooting...
"...was more forceful."
I agree. He definitely won on style. He is a more experienced public speaker, and W looked outclassed, tired, and worn down. Plus, his stammering and "uh's" did not help. If he loses the election, I would say it is because he does not communicate well at all in public.
By now, most voters have made up their minds. Kerry's attack dog tone might play well with the liberal press but I doubt it played well with undecideds (if there are any left). The President stayed on message tonight as he has out on the campaign trail. He spoke TO the voters and NOT at the voters. Kerry is arrogant and Bush is genuine.
The ABC poll shows nobody has changed their minds over this debate though.
I think people do believe he won the debate, but they want to see more, including the next two debates before deciding.
This is a big relief.....I was seriously concerned due to the utter humiliation that we would lose many points to Kerry tonight.....but I am now hopeful the polls won't really tighten now and pretty much stay the same.
I agree..
My only dissapointment is that I was really hoping for the knockout blow to come tonight :(
But now W knows what to expect from Kerry...this was like the first round of a heavyweight title fight, a "feeling-out" process...he'll improve a lot in the next 2 rounds.
Kerry was probably at his very best, and Bush at about his worst, and still Kerry couldnt really do any damage....
Not to mention he lobbed the RNC a nice big juicy fastball right over the plate with the "Glocal Test" hehehe...something tells me we'll be hearing a lot about this test in the coming days and weeks..... *diabolical grin*
I have observed the debates since 1976. Only a few ever had moments that were smackdowns. Gerald Ford's bone head remark about Poland in 76. Jimmuh's seeking Amy's advice and Reagan's summation in 80. Dukaka's answer in 88.
Since that time, most debates have been characterized as draws.
Nice to see that you're getting some perspective on this thing tonight.
and the GloBal Test,too...lol My diabolical giddyness is overwhelming my typing skills....or lack thereof
You must be thinking of CNN's (Looks Like She Likes To Eat A Lot Of) Candy Crowley, not Monica:
Remember Kerry has defined this campaign as a referendum on IRAQ. He has not done anything tonight to show to the American people that it has become a quagmire. In that sense, Kerry was the loser.
Kerry was making smoke. How many times did he talk about some "plan" or another? How many times did he get specific? I wish Bush had gone after Kerry on his senate record - or lack thereof - but there are two more debates for that.
Don't be an idiot.
BTW, Candy Crowley is one of the few CNN reporters who actually tries to report it straight, similar to Lisa Meyers on NBC.
Anybody remember Clinton's speech in August 1998, where he finally admitted to having an affair with Monica? The polls taken right after the speech said he did a great job, and Clinton's spinners were all on TV saying he hit a home run. It wasn't until days later that it became clear to the media and the RATS that the speech was a disaster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.