Skip to comments.
Concessions
Danny Boy ^
| Sep 22, 2004
| dan blather
Posted on 09/22/2004 8:00:04 AM PDT by jtesh
vanity
(Excerpt) Read more at danblather.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: a5minuteargument; agitprop; bushhater; certainty; mobyisthatyou; mobysmarchingmorons; oldblogposts; troll; wmd; zot; zothimnow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: jtesh
WMD's are still there buried in the sand someplace. If not then you should feel proud that we have liberated millions of oppressed people you heartless commie.
41
posted on
09/22/2004 8:24:25 AM PDT
by
Teflonic
To: Old Sarge
To: jtesh
Saddam lover. Why don't you go visit him to help with his depression. Maybe Fidel could join you fellas.
To: mhking
Look at this! The troll got a second salvo off!
Sorry 'bout thet, Boss, ah didn' lead 'im enuff!
44
posted on
09/22/2004 8:26:12 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
To: Conspiracy Guy
Your first picture reminded me of Saint Pancake, someone who probably weighs heavy in the mind of jtesh.
45
posted on
09/22/2004 8:26:16 AM PDT
by
weegee
(What's the provenance, Kenneth? Where did the forged SeeBS memo come from?)
To: jtesh
Why should we argue with a lie. A lie is a lie! Stupid.
46
posted on
09/22/2004 8:26:22 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Dan Rather, "I lied, but I lied about the truth".)
To: Old Sarge
Sorry 'bout thet, Boss, ah didn' lead 'im enuff! That's all right, soldier, just do better next time!!! ;)
47
posted on
09/22/2004 8:27:16 AM PDT
by
mhking
("Honey, WHERE...IS...MY....SUPER SUIT?" --Samuel L. Jackson, "The Incredibles")
To: bad company
48
posted on
09/22/2004 8:27:34 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Dan Rather, "I lied, but I lied about the truth".)
To: weegee
To: Teflonic
If John Kerry and the Stalin loving left wish that Saddam were left in power, perhaps they should make public appeals on Saddam Hussein's behalf. He hasn't gone to trial yet and should still be able to win Iraq elections (remember, he was able to get 100% of the vote, he should be able to win even if he loses nearly half of his support).
50
posted on
09/22/2004 8:28:48 AM PDT
by
weegee
(What's the provenance, Kenneth? Where did the forged SeeBS memo come from?)
To: Slings and Arrows
Now, THAT was a coffee-spit! BWAAHAAA!!!
51
posted on
09/22/2004 8:29:57 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
To: weegee
So many trolls right now I feel sorry for a new person who doesn't lurk a while.
52
posted on
09/22/2004 8:34:22 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Dan Rather, "I lied, but I lied about the truth".)
To: jtesh
You are outta here, troll.
53
posted on
09/22/2004 8:34:35 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Charter member of the VRWC - and proud of it. - - - Hear BS on See BS.)
To: jtesh
You're such a moron. A few questions for the mentally deranged (that's you)...
How many people were killed on 9/11?
What was the financial toll from 9/11?
Do you qualify what we saw on 9/11 as mass destruction?
Now, take that, and add just 1 (just 1) of those little itty, bitty sarin shells to a plane piloted by maniacal jihadists.
Result: Up to 250,00 killed instead of 3,000. All of those people you saw running for their lives being followed by that cloud filling the streets of New York: dead.
So, yeah, it's just a little sarin. Moron.
And, if you haven't noticed, there is a guy in Libya that said, "I don't want any part of what happened to Saddam. Come get my nukes". So, even if we don't find WMDs in Iraq, we are sending the message. And, that message is getting through...whether you like it or not.
54
posted on
09/22/2004 8:36:34 AM PDT
by
mattdono
(Chris Matthew is Zell Miller's b*tch! (and the MSM is FR's b*tch!))
To: asgardshill
Saddam was in violation because he did not account for his old WMD. Yo! Furball! Listen up!
Sadaam was in violation because he refused to account for the destruction of WMDs he said he already had! Big difference. Get it?
55
posted on
09/22/2004 8:37:38 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(And everything under the sun is in tune...but the sun is eclipsed by the moon.)
To: Conspiracy Guy
I've seen four in the last hour.
56
posted on
09/22/2004 8:38:02 AM PDT
by
bad company
(What's the font kenneth?)
To: jtesh
WMD's ?
USA Today
Fox News
Washington Post
San Diego Union Tribune
Al Qaeda Ties? Notice the airliner (Sept 11, 2001), and train cars, (Madrid 3/11/04), in the Salman Pac terrorist training facility outside Baghdad in this 2000 satellite photo. Click the image to get high resolution.
57
posted on
09/22/2004 8:41:32 AM PDT
by
DocRock
(Why don't the RNC protesters come down here and help clean up after Charley and Frances?)
To: bad company
Well, Dangit, PING ME!!! Demon-Cat is hungry!
58
posted on
09/22/2004 8:42:13 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
To: bad company
What happened to the one I pinged RKBA too. I've lost the dang thing!
59
posted on
09/22/2004 8:44:22 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Dan Rather, "I lied, but I lied about the truth".)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Yo! Furball! Listen up! I am listening. Intently.
Sadaam was in violation because he refused to account for the destruction of WMDs he said he already had! Big difference. Get it?
Got it. Only problem is that I think you meant this for jtesh, not me.
60
posted on
09/22/2004 8:46:40 AM PDT
by
asgardshill
(Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
