Skip to comments.
Paris Hilton in 'Gatsby' Remake (Signs of the Apocalypse)
Fox News ^
| Thursday, September 09, 2004
| Roger Friedman
Posted on 09/09/2004 10:47:48 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: dangus; akorahil; Petronski; presidio9
Okay, who'd win in a bore-off: Fitzgerald, Sinclair Lewis, or Theodore Dreiser?
21
posted on
09/09/2004 10:59:30 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(All of whom I've read, dammit.)
To: Xenalyte
22
posted on
09/09/2004 10:59:44 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Homophobic & Proud!!!)
To: dangus
You beat me to it!! No acting needed by Paris. Just through some 20's style outfits on her and she IS Daisy, a self-absorbed socialite with more money than brains.
To: Xenalyte
With that cast, they should call this version "The Grate Gatsby".
24
posted on
09/09/2004 11:01:02 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: presidio9
Ahem... I'd check out her web page before I spoke to her like that. *chuckle*
25
posted on
09/09/2004 11:01:40 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: presidio9
Not that there's anything wrong with that. :)
26
posted on
09/09/2004 11:02:06 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(All of whom I've read, dammit.)
To: Xenalyte
I like Gatsby, and anyway, I'm quite certain it's Dreiser.
27
posted on
09/09/2004 11:02:08 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(With what? Spitballs!?!)
To: presidio9
28
posted on
09/09/2004 11:02:08 AM PDT
by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
To: presidio9
Jay G. is cagey, he lives near the egg
He's got the money, he don' haf to beg!
Paris is Daisy? That talent scout's crazy!
My man Lance, at first he said "No way!"
Then that boy, he found out what it pay.
Those Hollywood guys, they always chase a buck
Too bad they make movies that really do suck
29
posted on
09/09/2004 11:02:46 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(I have two words for John Kerry: "YYYEEEEAAARRGGGHHHH!!!!")
To: Petronski
After considering the snoozefests that were "Sister Carrie" and "An American Tragedy," I might have to concur.
However, "Babbitt" and "Main Street" both stultified as well.
30
posted on
09/09/2004 11:02:50 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(All of whom I've read, dammit.)
To: ClearCase_guy; JustAmy
I nominate this post for poem of the day.
31
posted on
09/09/2004 11:03:48 AM PDT
by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
To: Xenalyte
I'll take that whole genre over Waugh/Woolf et al any day.
32
posted on
09/09/2004 11:03:50 AM PDT
by
PianoMan
(And now back to practicing)
To: Xenalyte
One time while reading Slaugherhouse Five, my head fell completely off of my body.
33
posted on
09/09/2004 11:05:05 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(With what? Spitballs!?!)
To: cyborg
You can check out my other work on the thread "Edwards Raps Bush"
34
posted on
09/09/2004 11:06:29 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(I have two words for John Kerry: "YYYEEEEAAARRGGGHHHH!!!!")
To: Xenalyte
I hate to tell you, but I've never read Dreiser. I kinda bounced around the tracking system in public school like a ping-pong ball. My understanding is that James Joyce is the all-time most boring author in history, and that the literati like to talk about him because he is so incoherent that it makes them seem smart.
OTOH, I've also heard the literati complain that people bought "A Brief History of Time" to make themselves look smart, but that no-one could actually read it. To the contrary, I found it had a most brilliant manner of teaching the abstractions of physics to the hoi palloi. I think the literati might simply not be that smart. I mean how many critics complained they couldn't follow Mission Impossible, a movie based on a Tom-and-Jerry episode, for Pete's sake.
35
posted on
09/09/2004 11:08:48 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: presidio9
The Great Gatsby is one of the few books I never finished. About a third in I realised that I didn't really give a rat's arse about what happened to any of the characters.
To: dangus
I stand corrected. James Joyce is the supreme literary navel-gazer of all time. UGH.
Re lacking Dreiser: you ain't missing much. Life is too short to read sucky books someone used to think were good.
37
posted on
09/09/2004 11:10:20 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(All of whom I've read, dammit.)
To: ClearCase_guy
...Of anything but money, they don't give a um, a
(i'm stuck.)
38
posted on
09/09/2004 11:10:45 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: PianoMan
I must admit to never having read Waugh or Woolf. I do have a well-publicized dislike of the Transcendentalists, though. Bunch of posers.
39
posted on
09/09/2004 11:11:10 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(All of whom I've read, dammit.)
To: presidio9
You'd be surprised the degree to which I am NOT a prude, but am I the only one who thinks that after making a video of herself having sex in a threesome (and I believe eventually negotiating a cut of the profits for its distribution), Paris Hilton has identified herself as a stupid, filthy skank? I'm really disturbed by the media touting her as a cute show biz phenom when she participated in outright hard core pornography.
40
posted on
09/09/2004 11:11:27 AM PDT
by
Williams
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson